Online Content Deletion

[Paslode]

Question.

Why is it, that the online content of every single domestic terrorist is deleted almost immediately scrubbed from the web?

The reason surely cannot be national security.

[Box]

Better put on a seat belt for this one...............




Because ALL of the major tech companies that run social media networks are anti American to begin with and hate the American way of life as "we the people" would normally define "American way of Life"

I've seen and asked this question myself in other venues.

The answer is almost always pure bullshit. Anti-American sympathizers will mindlessly try to tell you that the big social media companies are simply following their policies as they relate to terrorist or extremist content.
...which is pure bullshit.
...shamefully full of shit
...embarrassingly full of shit

If these organizations were "following their policy" as it relates to extremeist content - it would have been pulled loooooong before the circus starts selling tickets to the latest dumpster fire

They sure as fuck didn't wait to pull content during the scamdemic...
...didn't seem to get radical islamofascists from Iran to stop posting "hate speech" but it certainly did get THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED FUCKING STAES pulled
...and didnt seem at all concerned that they were complicit with Biden administration efforts to censor TRUTH during the scamdemic

I could see the claim that it is due to "public pressure" in some cases.
Nobody was reading this shit gobbling cocksuckers social media content before their shenanigans 'went public'
Nobody cared if this asshole was a Level 137 Dragon Master or a basement dwelling pole smoker...
...until they commit a fucking crime that gets NATIONAL attention.

THAT is when they say "oh look, this guy has been sneaking extremist consent under our noses for years - we didnt see it because he had so few followers - he wasn't trending - but we got it now - and he is SOOO banned"
...which is also pure bullshit - because these companies have been using automated protocols to tag content for almost as long as we;ve had to worry about it.

But Gates and the Amazon guy, and Suckerbird, and all the rest of them dont give a shit until riiiiiight up to the point when their legal teams tells them that they might be in a postion that opens them up to somedegree of liability...
...then they pull that mother fucker faster than a three year old boy that just discovered he has a dick.

Deleting it completely probably has some "evidence" implications as well - so I'm sure it isnt really gone - its just hidden.
...unless the governmnet asked them to shit can it
...or hide it
...or block it
...sort of like everyone has long since admitted to doing during the Biden administration
...in the name of "disinformation"




or something along those lines - I'm just spitballin' here

[Paslode]

I concur it must be something along those lines and with some government compliance.

Another caveat to this is the vast majority of these people over the last 10-20 years dispatch themselves at the scene instead of following natures instinct of fight or flight. And I would wager they don't kill themselves out of remorse for the harm they just caused their victims.

I guess you could chalk this up to pre-planned indoctrination as with Kamikaze Pilots, Bonzi Charges and Suicide Bombers. True Believers or people who have been coerced or indoctrinated.

The end result of the media scrubbing and self inflicted elimination allows for someone to control the narrative...........not al that long ago this is all in the realm of Alex Jones and Tin Foil conspiracy.

[Box]

I'm going to go even darker.

I'll bet every time these tech giant assholes "clean" a social profile they grit their teeth in fucking anger. Not becuase a bad thing happened - but because they tacitly support these evil cocksuckers six days a week and twice on Sunday. They espouse and cultivate this spiteful globalist rhetoric until they get called out for it.
Then they clean EVERYTHING - furious that they can't leave it up so they can't speak to the masses through an Army of proxies and sycophants that spout the shit they can't...
...its no different than draping yourself in Kenji cloth and kneeling for the cameras in support of the George Floyd riots.

They WILLINGLY allow biased partisan shit to float around their platforms virtually unchecked. "If I like it - it stays - if its adversarial in any way - **POOF** - extremist content - shadow ban - gone."
...until some asshole embarrasses the movement or betrays the narrative.

Once the fucking Taylor Robinsons of the world pop their miserable heads up - these leftist tyrannical tech giant assholes have no choice but to feign compliance with their own rules. Then sure as Bob's your Uncle, the shit disappears so gosh darned fast is because the REAL public outcry would come from seeing how bad and how old some of these fucking posts really are.
...all the while "Poor old Aunt Hortense" had her fucking corn bread recipe pulled and got locked out of her social media account until she apologized and took down her "extremist content" that said "Christians Love Cornbread, God Loves Donald Trump"

Mark Suckerbird admitted in front of god and everybody - he willingly complied with the Biden administration to censor FakeBroke posts during the scamdemic. It's the same across the entire social media spectrum.

Bow to your fucking overlords - or else.

[Badger52]

^^^ Big 10-4 there Ghostrider.

[JimP]

Dam......Box on fire!!

Well said.

Spot on.

Circular error probable: zero meters.

[glebo]

Haa, yeah someone must have spiked Box's afternoon hotty totty...

[Airbornelawyer]

I am curious about one thing. When they delete a post, does that also delete the "likes" and "retweets" (or whatever is the appropriate terminology on a particular platform)? It would seem that would be useful information for identifying the networks of like-minded individuals, though some might also think it's prejudicial and use that as an excuse for deleting.

[bubba]

Originally Posted by Airbornelawyer

I am curious about one thing. When they delete a post, does that also delete the "likes" and "retweets" (or whatever is the appropriate terminology on a particular platform)? It would seem that would be useful information for identifying the networks of like-minded individuals, though some might also think it's prejudicial and use that as an excuse for deleting.

Nothing is ever deleted, not really anyway…… believe me when I say, NOTHING!

[GratefulCitizen]

Hearts and minds.

Modern media is curated to create sufficient belief in several given narratives such that:

1 -the people are dissuaded from gathering with torches and pitchforks.
-or-
2 -if they do gather, the torch people are set against the pitchfork people.

[Badger52]

Originally Posted by GratefulCitizen

Hearts and minds.

Modern media is curated to create sufficient belief in several given narratives such that:

1 -the people are dissuaded from gathering with torches and pitchforks.
-or-
2 -if they do gather, the torch people are set against the pitchfork people.

Good points. Lenin in the 1920's. Create different classes of kulak and foster jealousy among them.

[glebo]

Originally Posted by Badger52

Good points. Lenin in the 1920's. Create different classes of kulak and foster jealousy among them.

Thus we have the media always (pstly) creating the racial divide in the US.

It's always been, and will always be a wedge in our society.. It won't go away if people keep bringing it up, in a negative way anyhow...

[Paslode]

Does the media actually have any pull or is it just spin?

For example Jimmy K is estimated to have had 6-8 million viewers on his return, whereas Johnny Carson was estimated to have had 50 Million viewers for his last show. Carson averaged 19 million viewers whereas Jimmy K was averaging just over a million.

[Box]

its ALL spin - their "pull" is their ability to spin

gaslighting costs money

[bblhead672]

Originally Posted by Paslode

For example Jimmy K is estimated to have had 6-8 million viewers on his return, whereas Johnny Carson was estimated to have had 50 Million viewers for his last show. Carson averaged 19 million viewers whereas Jimmy K was averaging just over a million.

Kimmel's return viewer spike dropped rapidly after the first night - per a FauxNews report:

Kimmel shed even more viewers in the advertiser-coveted demographic of adults aged 25-54, with Thursday’s episode hemorrhaging 73% of viewers from the critical category.

"Jimmy Kimmel Live!" pulled in 1.7 million viewers among the key demo for Tuesday’s return but plummeted to 465,000 only 48 hours later.

"Jimmy Kimmel Live!" also lost significant viewers in the younger demographic of adults aged 18-49, managing 1.2 million on Tuesday but quickly losing 73% to settle for only 334,000 on Thursday.