08-18-2016, 13:49
|
#1
|
Guerrilla Chief
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 694
|
My question is: Why are they still in Turkey, and why has it taken this bloody long to decide to move them?
|
DJ Urbanovsky is offline
|
|
08-18-2016, 14:20
|
#2
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland
Posts: 24,816
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ Urbanovsky
My question is: Why are they still in Turkey, and why has it taken this bloody long to decide to move them?
|
Where do you think they would be secure, and welcome?
TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910
De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
|
The Reaper is offline
|
|
08-18-2016, 15:17
|
#3
|
Area Commander
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Texas, USA
Posts: 1,653
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Reaper
Where do you think they would be secure, and welcome?
TR
|
Texas?
|
bblhead672 is offline
|
|
08-18-2016, 15:32
|
#4
|
Guerrilla
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 160
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bblhead672
Texas? 
|
Poland? Same buffer as Romania, and next to zero Muslim migration.
Then again, the Pols don't care too much for our Muslim President, so that rules out special favors.
|
Patrin is offline
|
|
08-18-2016, 15:34
|
#5
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Clarksville, TN
Posts: 1,164
|
It is the policy of the United States government to neither confirm nor deny the presence of nuclear weapons at any given facility. So
"Those who speak don't know, and those who know, don't speak."
As for the second question.
Quote:
Where do you think they would be secure, and welcome?
|
I'd answer: "Israel."
|
CSB is offline
|
|
08-18-2016, 15:58
|
#6
|
Area Commander
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Midwest
Posts: 2,842
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSB
It is the policy of the United States government to neither confirm nor deny the presence of nuclear weapons at any given facility. So
"Those who speak don't know, and those who know, don't speak."
|
I am sure that at one time that statement was very true and I wish I could believe that to be the case today however........................
__________________
The only reason some people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory.
|
cbtengr is offline
|
|
08-18-2016, 16:33
|
#7
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,511
|
They could have left them there with timers on.
|
ddoering is offline
|
|
08-18-2016, 16:48
|
#8
|
Area Commander
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Western WI
Posts: 6,988
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddoering
They could have left them there with timers on.
|
Another damn monitor ruined....
__________________
"Civil Wars don't start when a few guys hunt down a specific bastard. Civil Wars start when many guys hunt down the nearest bastards."
The coin paid to enforce words on parchment is blood; tyrants will not be stopped with anything less dear. - QP Peregrino
|
Badger52 is offline
|
|
08-18-2016, 16:52
|
#9
|
Area Commander
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Black Hills of SD
Posts: 5,944
|
I'd take this story with a grain of salt ...
It is Alex Jones and his InfoWars website after all.
__________________
Non Sibi Sed Suis
_____________________________________________
It's Good To Be Da King !!!! Just ask NDD !!!!
|
Sdiver is offline
|
|
08-18-2016, 17:34
|
#10
|
Guerrilla
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 160
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddoering
They could have left them there with timers on.
|
 ...again, the profit is alllllll yours.
|
Patrin is offline
|
|
08-18-2016, 17:58
|
#11
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 20,929
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddoering
They could have left them there with timers on.
|
I like the way you think.........
__________________
"The Spartans do not ask how many are the enemy, but where they are."
|
Team Sergeant is offline
|
|
08-18-2016, 21:34
|
#12
|
Area Commander
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Lone Star
Posts: 2,153
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddoering
They could have left them there with timers on.
|
...and leave breadcrumbs for ISIS/AQ/other variants to find them. You know those things can be finnicky. The old fuses might go off. Leave a stuxnet-type worm just for safe measure AND have Israel fingerprints all over it. They certainly have interest against nuclear-armed Syria or Iraq. Is that infowar-esque enough folks?
__________________
"we also rejoice in our sufferings, because we know that suffering produces perseverance; perseverance, character; and character, hope" Rom. 5:3-4
"So we can suffer, and in suffering we know who we are" David Goggins
"Aide-toi, Dieu t'aidera " Jehanne, la Pucelle
Der, der Geld verliert, verliert einiges;
Der, der einen Freund verliert, verliert viel mehr;
Der, der das Vertrauen verliert, verliert alles.
INDNJC
|
frostfire is offline
|
|
08-18-2016, 19:57
|
#13
|
Guerrilla Chief
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 694
|
That's an excellent question that I am not really qualified to answer. Secure + welcome? That's a tough combination. It is my understanding, based on public records, that the stockpile in Turkey is all B61 bombs, correct?
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Reaper
Where do you think they would be secure, and welcome?
TR
|
|
DJ Urbanovsky is offline
|
|
08-18-2016, 21:48
|
#14
|
Guerrilla
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 124
|
Nuke redeployment
First, I agree with why wait until it is OBE? I think the main consideration is what country would welcome them. Then, if they could be secure from external threat.
The joker in the deck is whoever is to become CINC. Clinton seems aware of the overall military state of readiness, The question is her willingness to accept any recommendations of the Chairman JCS. She has not shown to me an ability to use subordinates and their expertise. She does have a reputation of treating her staff with disdain. If it is Trump, he has clearly stated that the NATO has outlived its usefulness. He seems to have a feeling that our troops should withdraw from Europe. He seems to lean towards the isolationism not seen since the 1920s .He has announced that he distrusts the generals advice. He states he will build up the military to greatness again, but no specificity.
J R sends
DOL
|
bushmaster11 is offline
|
|
08-21-2016, 11:02
|
#15
|
Area Commander
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Northern Neck Virginia
Posts: 1,138
|
Russia moving to Incirlik? A new Timeshare deal?
The Russians are coming, or not? Or, are the Russians just trying to secure its southern flank before moving deeper into Ukraine? Either way the next administration had better be the A-Team. Fat chance of that.
Quote:
http://www.jewishpress.com/news/brea...se/2016/08/21/
Turkish PM Denying Russia Demanding to Use NATO Nuke Base
Turkish Prime Minister Binali Yildirim said Russia is not demanding to land its planes in the İncirlik air base in southern Turkey, as several Russian news services have claimed. “Russia had no demands to use İncirlik air base, those reports are not true,” Yildirim told foreign correspondents in Istanbul on Saturday, according to Hurriyet Daily News. However, the prime minister did agree that should Russia wish to use the base for its operations against ISIS, it would be welcome to do so. Still, Yildirim added, “Russia doesn’t need to use the base. They have bases in Syria.”
Yildirim’s statement concluded an anxiety-filled few days in which Russian news sources were announcing that Russia has been demanding that Turkey give its air force access to the NATO air base in İncirlik, which is where US and coalition air forces take off on their strikes in Syria. Located some 65 miles from the Syrian border, Incirlik is also where an estimated 50 US B-61 nuclear warheads (think 100 Hiroshimas times 50) are kept.
According to Izvestia, a Russian lawmaker named Igor Morozov said it was only a matter of time before Turkish president Erdogan hands over the NATO base at Incirlik to the Russians, to intensify the war against ISIS. “You’ll see, the next base will be İncirlik,” Morozov told Izvestia, shortly after the Kremlin had revealed that Russian bombers have been using an Iranian airbase for their attack on Syria. He predicted İncirlik would be “one more victory for Putin.”
Those statements came against the background of a report by EurActiv, a Belgian foundation focusing on European Union policies, that the US has begun to transfer its nuclear weapons stationed in Turkey to Romania, for fear of the worsening relations between Washington and Ankara.
|
__________________
v/r,
LarryW
"Do not go gentle into that good night..."
|
LarryW is offline
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:51.
|
|
|