06-25-2012, 09:40
|
#1
|
|
Area Commander
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pinehurst,NC
Posts: 1,091
|
Do we need this documentary?
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2120152/
I have not seen this movie. Of course since it's a liberal production, my assumption, Rotten tomatoes gives it a 100%. The premise is that for a woman soldier the odds of being raped are higher then being killed in combat. At first glance, I would imagine in any war these odds are similar.
I hope, this documentary is highlighting the exception not the rule, and that the following quote is overstated:
An investigative documentary about the epidemic of rape of soldiers within the US military.
Maybe others who are on active duty can provide a better insight into this problem.
__________________
Let us conduct ourselves in such a fashion that all nations wish to be our friends and all fear to be our enemies. The Virtues of War - Steven Pressfield
Last edited by dennisw; 06-25-2012 at 10:08.
|
|
dennisw is offline
|
|
06-25-2012, 10:17
|
#2
|
|
BANNED USER
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,751
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dennisw
The premise is that for a woman soldier the odds of being raped are higher then being killed in combat. At first glance, I would imagine in any war these odds will similar.
|
Statistically a pretty accurate statement
Iraq: 0.0239% chance (115 women fatalities/4804 total fatalities)
Afghanistan: 0.0120% chance (37/3062) in Afghanistan.
A sobering web site: http://icasualties.org/
A little on the dramatic side but probably to contrast Rape (a fate worse then) to Death. Rape is a very serious problem with no solution in sight. No matter how many times you watch the SHARP (sexual Harassment and Rape Prevention)training. http://www.sexualassault.army.mil/index.cfm
|
|
Dozer523 is offline
|
|
06-25-2012, 10:19
|
#3
|
|
RIP Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Ozarks
Posts: 10,072
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dennisw
The premise is that for a woman soldier the odds of being raped are higher then being killed in combat.
|
Not for she-Rangers.
__________________
"There you go, again." Ronald Reagan
|
|
Dusty is offline
|
|
06-25-2012, 10:34
|
#4
|
|
Area Commander
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pinehurst,NC
Posts: 1,091
|
Quote:
|
Iraq: 0.0239% chance (115 women fatalities/4804 total fatalities)
|
I believe they are looking at it differently. 115 women killed compared to number of women having been deployed. Then comparing this to the number of women raped while deployed to number having been deployed.
According to the following website, http://www.pbs.org/newshour/extra/fe...men_12-18.html, 155,000 women have been deployed since 2002. That means the percentage of women KIA is 0.0742%. Bottom line, apparently there has been more than 115 rapes for their premise to be true.
Most of us would agree that one rape is too many. However, it seems like just another attempt to tarnish our institutions.
__________________
Let us conduct ourselves in such a fashion that all nations wish to be our friends and all fear to be our enemies. The Virtues of War - Steven Pressfield
|
|
dennisw is offline
|
|
06-25-2012, 12:08
|
#5
|
|
Area Commander
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 4,483
|
FWIW, the DoD's Office of Sexual Assault Prevention and Response has made available its annual reports here. (Note that there's a separate tab for reports on the service academies.)
|
|
Sigaba is offline
|
|
06-25-2012, 12:11
|
#6
|
|
BANNED USER
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,751
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dennisw
. . . 155,000 women have been deployed since 2002. That means the percentage of women KIA is 0.0742%. Bottom line, apparently there has been more than 115 rapes for their premise to be true.
Most of us would agree that one rape is too many. However, it seems like just another attempt to tarnish our institutions.
|
1555,000 is a lot of deployments so is 10 years, a long time.
According to this: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0..._n_176106.html
I cite this from ^: "The Pentagon said it received 2,923 reports of sexual assault across the military in the 12 months ending Sept. 30 2008. That's about a 9 percent increase over the totals reported the year before, but only a fraction of the crimes presumably being committed. . . .
The Pentagon office that collects the data estimates that only 10 percent to 20 percent of sexual assaults among members of the active duty military are reported a figure similar to estimates of reported cases in the civilian sphere.
2923/1,400,000 is 0.00208 so the stat is actually bogus.
Luckily, it's also not the point.
In answer to your initial question: do we need this documentary? I think so, unfortunately. But that's how we get this stuff fixed.
And I'm sorta guilty, was not a big deal to me 25-30 years ago to me but now my daughter is of enlistment age and well, all those female Soldiers kinda look like BCMU if I squint. I'm glad the military is trying to address it.
Last edited by Dozer523; 06-25-2012 at 12:19.
|
|
Dozer523 is offline
|
|
06-25-2012, 12:38
|
#7
|
|
Guest
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dennisw
I believe they are looking at it differently. 115 women killed compared to number of women having been deployed. Then comparing this to the number of women raped while deployed to number having been deployed.
According to the following website, http://www.pbs.org/newshour/extra/fe...men_12-18.html, 155,000 women have been deployed since 2002. That means the percentage of women KIA is 0.0742%. Bottom line, apparently there has been more than 115 rapes for their premise to be true.
Most of us would agree that one rape is too many. However, it seems like just another attempt to tarnish our institutions.
|
The military is doing a pretty good job tarnishing it's own reputation.
|
|
|
|
06-25-2012, 12:48
|
#8
|
|
SF Candidate
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: FT Hood, Tx
Posts: 21
|
IMHO, I think it's a necessary documentary. As a Active Duty Mp I have worked rape cases several times. Rape against females by males, females against males and males against males. Unfortunately, it is a major issue in all branches of service. Having looked into the eyes of victims, I say, whatever video, class, or ppt that comes out is necessary. Just my two cents.
V/R
|
|
We'rewolf is offline
|
|
06-25-2012, 13:17
|
#9
|
|
Area Commander
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Western WI
Posts: 7,053
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dozer523
.... but now my daughter is of enlistment age and well, all those female Soldiers kinda look like BCMU if I squint. I'm glad the military is trying to address it.
|
First Dozer I wish your daughter all the best. My daughter has confided to me that thru 5 full tours in Afghanistan starting Nov '01 she's never made a move without a weapon - something I nodded to & heartily concurred with. Unfortunately during the last two deployments she said she was carrying primarily for the less obvious reason, as was the accompanying 'buddy'.
This will need to get fixed in rather draconian fashion.
|
|
Badger52 is offline
|
|
06-25-2012, 13:24
|
#10
|
|
Area Commander
Join Date: May 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 1,644
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Badger52
First Dozer I wish your daughter all the best. My daughter has confided to me that thru 5 full tours in Afghanistan starting Nov '01 she's never made a move without a weapon - something I nodded to & heartily concurred with. Unfortunately during the last two deployments she said she was carrying primarily for the less obvious reason, as was the accompanying 'buddy'.
This will need to get fixed in rather draconian fashion.
|
When my husband and I first got married, we spent 7 months apart while we were both deployed. He would get on my case about NEVER walking around by myself. Me, being me, took offense to his thinking I couldn't take care of myself. But I honored his wishes, because the last thing I wanted him worried about while he was in harms way, was me.
Now I preach this to all the women that work for me. Hell I was just preaching it to my daughter the other day before she went off to the Jersey Shore with her aunts and cousins.
NEVER go anywhere by yourself, and ALWAYS utilize the buddy system.
It is a simple precautionary measure that could wind up saving you lots of pain and agony. I know from experience.
|
|
afchic is offline
|
|
06-25-2012, 14:05
|
#11
|
|
Quiet Professional (RIP)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Carriere,Ms.
Posts: 6,922
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by afchic
When my husband and I first got married, we spent 7 months apart while we were both deployed. He would get on my case about NEVER walking around by myself. Me, being me, took offense to his thinking I couldn't take care of myself. But I honored his wishes, because the last thing I wanted him worried about while he was in harms way, was me.
Now I preach this to all the women that work for me. Hell I was just preaching it to my daughter the other day before she went off to the Jersey Shore with her aunts and cousins.
NEVER go anywhere by yourself, and ALWAYS utilize the buddy system.
It is a simple precautionary measure that could wind up saving you lots of pain and agony. I know from experience.
|
afchic
I hear you and you bet I think your absolutely right,that's sound advise your giving out.
Big Teddy
__________________
I believe that SF is a 'calling' - not too different from the calling missionaries I know received. I knew instantly that it was for me, and that I would do all I could to achieve it. Most others I know in SF experienced something similar. If, as you say, you HAVE searched and read, and you do not KNOW if this is the path for you --- it is not....
Zonie Diver
SF is a calling and it requires commitment and dedication that the uninitiated will never understand......
Jack Moroney
SFA M-2527, Chapter XXXVII
Last edited by greenberetTFS; 06-25-2012 at 14:23.
|
|
greenberetTFS is offline
|
|
06-25-2012, 16:36
|
#12
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland
Posts: 24,835
|
I suspect that the numbers are no higher in the military than any other segment of the US population in the comparable age brackets. They might even be significantly lower.
You want to see some really scary numbers, look what the Red Army did to the females when they passed through Germany in 1945.
TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910
De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
|
|
The Reaper is offline
|
|
06-26-2012, 09:45
|
#13
|
|
Area Commander
Join Date: May 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 1,644
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Reaper
I suspect that the numbers are no higher in the military than any other segment of the US population in the comparable age brackets. They might even be significantly lower.
You want to see some really scary numbers, look what the Red Army did to the females when they passed through Germany in 1945.
TR
|
You are right that they probably aren't higher. But the difference is that we (the american populace and especially military members) should expect more from those that put on the uniform.
Rape has been used throughout history as a terror tactic, that will not change. Hell, look at what is going on in Syria right now. But regardless of how often it is used, nothing will change until the leadership of these folks condemn the action. That isn't going to happen either, the spoils of war.
|
|
afchic is offline
|
|
06-26-2012, 11:40
|
#14
|
|
Area Commander
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Western WI
Posts: 7,053
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by afchic
You are right that they probably aren't higher. But the difference is that we (the american populace and especially military members) should expect more from those that put on the uniform.
|
I think you hit the difference right there; the primary concern is the danger from within, from someone who is ostensibly a brother/sister at arms. Numbers may jive with a commensurate cross-section of civilian populace but has zero place in a professional military. Some public-square examples may need to be made, but at this point I don't think they have the stones.
|
|
Badger52 is offline
|
|
06-26-2012, 12:30
|
#15
|
|
Area Commander
Join Date: May 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 1,644
|
Take this next rant for what it is worth, just my opinion.
The DoD has gone about addressing this problem all wrong. How many of you men have sat through the mandatory sexual harassment training, and came out feeling as if the military thought you were a piece of shit?
How many of you women out there have sat through the same class and came out feeling like the military cast you as a victim?
We don't need annual sexual harrassment training, in my estimation. What we need to emphasize is that we are brothers and sisters in arms, and anything that jeapordizes that relationship not only brings shame upon the military as a whole, but demoralizes us as a unit.
If we take that route, and talk about how we can work together as a team, vs the us vs them mentality that permeates the current training, maybe we would go a long way to solving the rape problem. And it may have the added benefit of alleviating the number of cases in which women cry wolf.
Maybe I am giving us to much credit. There are a lot of kids in uniform these days. But team cohesion is what we need, and if we can teach them that, just maybe.....
|
|
afchic is offline
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 17:58.
|
|
|