Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > At Ease > The Early Bird

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-18-2011, 18:33   #16
Dusty
RIP Quiet Professional
 
Dusty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Ozarks
Posts: 10,072
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gypsy View Post
Yep.

More babies = more money.
At a minimum, they should be able to identify the father.
__________________
"There you go, again." Ronald Reagan
Dusty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2011, 18:45   #17
grog18b
Guerrilla
 
grog18b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canton, PA
Posts: 230
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dusty View Post
At a minimum, they should be able to identify the father.
You ever watch Maury? It's like a train wreck. You can't turn away. Even after some huge fat chick none of us would do back in the "hoggin" days, drags 8 dudes onto that show for DNA tests... NONE of them the baby's daddy.

Not only is it sick to think of ONE dude sticking those hogs, but more than 8 in a MONTH! Jeebus...

How about substance testing for POLITICIANS AND LAWYERS?
__________________
"...as far as rights go, I look at them this way. I won't tell you what kind of church to go to, you don't tell me what kind of firearm I can own."

Quote:
Finally, I believe that punishing lawful gun owners by creating new, more onerous laws, and restricting Constitutionally guaranteed rights, when we already don't enforce the tens of thousands of gun laws we have on the books, is like beating your dog because the neighbor's dog shit in your yard.
"The Reaper"
grog18b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2011, 18:55   #18
Gypsy
Area Commander
 
Gypsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Midwest
Posts: 7,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dusty View Post
At a minimum, they should be able to identify the father.
You'd like to think the baby mommas could...but it's probably quite a task.
__________________
My Heroes wear camouflage.
Gypsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2011, 00:48   #19
TOMAHAWK9521
Quiet Professional
 
TOMAHAWK9521's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,208
Quote:
Originally Posted by grog18b View Post

How about substance testing for POLITICIANS AND LAWYERS?
Curses! You beat me to it!
__________________
"It is a brave act of valor to condemn death, but where life is more terrible than death, it is then the truest valor to dare to live." -Sir Thomas Browne (1605-1682)
TOMAHAWK9521 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2011, 05:58   #20
Richard
Quiet Professional
 
Richard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 15,370
The presumption of guilt until proven innocent...what a novel idea...certainly our Founding Fathers must not have been aware of such a concept when authoring the Bill of Rights...or were they.

IMO, such myopic thinking, as well meaning as it may appear to some, does not bode well for a Democratic Republican ideal such as America presents itself as being to the world.

Richard
__________________
“Sometimes the Bible in the hand of one man is worse than a whisky bottle in the hand of (another)… There are just some kind of men who – who’re so busy worrying about the next world they’ve never learned to live in this one, and you can look down the street and see the results.” - To Kill A Mockingbird (Atticus Finch)

“Almost any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.” - Robert Heinlein
Richard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2011, 08:25   #21
PedOncoDoc
Area Commander
 
PedOncoDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Northeast Utah
Posts: 1,712
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard View Post
The presumption of guilt until proven innocent...what a novel idea...certainly our Founding Fathers must not have been aware of such a concept when authoring the Bill of Rights...or were they.
I'll have to disagree with you, Richard. I do not think this is implied/presumed guilt any more so than a drug screen prior to employment. Perhaps a discussion on the appropriateness of drug screening programs for anyone other than convicted drug offenders is in order.

I was quite shocked to find out the current hospital at which I work did not perform drug screening prior to employment. Of course, it is in the city that holds the annual "Hash Bash"...
__________________
‎"The dignity of man is not shattered in a single blow, but slowly softened, bent, and eventually neutered. Men are seldom forced to act, but are constantly restrained from acting. Such power does not destroy outright, but prevents genuine existence. It does not tyrannize immediately, but it dampens, weakens, and ultimately suffocates, until the entire population is reduced to nothing better than a flock of timid, uninspired animals, of which the government is shepherd." - Alexis de Tocqueville
PedOncoDoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2011, 08:54   #22
Richard
Quiet Professional
 
Richard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 15,370
Some interesting points:

Substance Use Among Persons in Families Receiving Government Assistance

http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/2k2/GovAid/GovAid.htm

Should Welfare Recipients Get Drug Testing?

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...ryId=125387528

Drug Testing of Public Assistance Recipients as a Condition of Eligibility

http://www.aclu.org/drug-law-reform/...on-eligibility

And so it goes...

Richard
__________________
“Sometimes the Bible in the hand of one man is worse than a whisky bottle in the hand of (another)… There are just some kind of men who – who’re so busy worrying about the next world they’ve never learned to live in this one, and you can look down the street and see the results.” - To Kill A Mockingbird (Atticus Finch)

“Almost any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.” - Robert Heinlein
Richard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2011, 13:30   #23
Dozer523
BANNED USER
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,751
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedOncoDoc View Post
I'll have to disagree with you, Richard. I do not think this is implied/presumed guilt any more so than a drug screen prior to employment. Perhaps a discussion on the appropriateness of drug screening programs for anyone other than convicted drug offenders is in order.

I was quite shocked to find out the current hospital at which I work did not perform drug screening prior to employment. Of course, it is in the city that holds the annual "Hash Bash"...
Now I'm disagreeing with you, Doc. Taking and passing the employment drug test is a blatant presumption of guilt because the applicant is called to prove he is not guilty.
Dozer523 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2011, 15:28   #24
grog18b
Guerrilla
 
grog18b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canton, PA
Posts: 230
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedOncoDoc View Post
I do not think this is implied/presumed guilt any more so than a drug screen prior to employment.
In order to be hired for PSP now, not only is there the drug testing, but a polygraph, and extensive background check.

That is for a job you want.

I see no problem with requiring people that receive OUR tax dollars for support, at least be clean when it comes to drugs, and not be using that money for illegal drug buying purposes. Also, I don't think it should be cash, or a similar form of untracable item like food stamps. It should be a "credit" type card with a photo of the recipient, to insure they are used for proper purchases. Cigarettes and booze are not proper purchases.

Our whole "welfare system" needs revamped badly. VERY badly.
__________________
"...as far as rights go, I look at them this way. I won't tell you what kind of church to go to, you don't tell me what kind of firearm I can own."

Quote:
Finally, I believe that punishing lawful gun owners by creating new, more onerous laws, and restricting Constitutionally guaranteed rights, when we already don't enforce the tens of thousands of gun laws we have on the books, is like beating your dog because the neighbor's dog shit in your yard.
"The Reaper"
grog18b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2011, 15:31   #25
PedOncoDoc
Area Commander
 
PedOncoDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Northeast Utah
Posts: 1,712
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dozer523 View Post
Now I'm disagreeing with you, Doc. Taking and passing the employment drug test is a blatant presumption of guilt because the applicant is called to prove he is not guilty.
Perhaps they are testing basic coordination (con you pee in this cup without making a mess?), and the drug test is just an added bonus.
__________________
‎"The dignity of man is not shattered in a single blow, but slowly softened, bent, and eventually neutered. Men are seldom forced to act, but are constantly restrained from acting. Such power does not destroy outright, but prevents genuine existence. It does not tyrannize immediately, but it dampens, weakens, and ultimately suffocates, until the entire population is reduced to nothing better than a flock of timid, uninspired animals, of which the government is shepherd." - Alexis de Tocqueville
PedOncoDoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2011, 15:53   #26
Dozer523
BANNED USER
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,751
Quote:
Originally Posted by grog18b View Post
I see no problem with requiring people that receive OUR tax dollars for support. . .
Our whole "welfare system" needs revamped badly. VERY badly.
In the olden days that system was called "the Poor Farm". (see the second paragraph. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poorhouse )
Or read the poem here. http://www.poorhousestory.com/over_the_hill.htm Is that really what we want?
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedOncoDoc View Post
Perhaps they are testing basic coordination (con you pee in this cup without making a mess?), and the drug test is just an added bonus.
A two-fer? That's different. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3FnpaWQJO0

Last edited by Dozer523; 01-19-2011 at 16:00.
Dozer523 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2011, 19:12   #27
Jgood
Quiet Professional
 
Jgood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Currently FT. Bragg
Posts: 622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dozer523 View Post
In the olden days that system was called "the Poor Farm". (see the second paragraph. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poorhouse )
Or read the poem here. http://www.poorhousestory.com/over_the_hill.htm Is that really what we want?

Might change some peoples minds about riding the gravy train ....
__________________
There is only one tactical principal which is not subject to change. It is to use the means at hand to inflict the maximum amount of wounds, death and destruction on the enemy in the minimum amount of time.
Gen. George S. Patton, Jr.
Jgood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2011, 21:20   #28
grog18b
Guerrilla
 
grog18b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canton, PA
Posts: 230
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dozer523 View Post
In the olden days that system was called "the Poor Farm". (see the second paragraph. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poorhouse )
Or read the poem here. http://www.poorhousestory.com/over_the_hill.htm Is that really what we want?


A two-fer? That's different. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3FnpaWQJO0
No, not at all. What we SHOULD be doing are programs like the CCC, and put these welfare people to work picking up garbage, and repairing our deteriorating State and National park system. Give them a orange vest and let them pick up garbage along the highway. At least then, they would be providing a service, instead of breeding another generation of welfare feeders.
__________________
"...as far as rights go, I look at them this way. I won't tell you what kind of church to go to, you don't tell me what kind of firearm I can own."

Quote:
Finally, I believe that punishing lawful gun owners by creating new, more onerous laws, and restricting Constitutionally guaranteed rights, when we already don't enforce the tens of thousands of gun laws we have on the books, is like beating your dog because the neighbor's dog shit in your yard.
"The Reaper"
grog18b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2011, 22:31   #29
Dozer523
BANNED USER
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,751
Quote:
Originally Posted by grog18b View Post
No, not at all. What we SHOULD be doing are programs like the CCC, and put these welfare people to work picking up garbage, and repairing our deteriorating State and National park system. Give them a orange vest and let them pick up garbage along the highway. At least then, they would be providing a service, instead of breeding another generation of welfare feeders.
One of the things that made the CCC and WPA successful was the work was meaningful and honorable. They were jobs people were proud of (to this day). Traditionally, roadside work crews wore stripes.
Dozer523 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2011, 22:45   #30
Todd 1
Guerrilla
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast
Posts: 143
Working hard for a wage and providing for your family no matter what the job may be IS honorable.

I would shovel shit forever before I would collect a welfare check.
Todd 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:45.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies