Soldier Sues Micheal Moore

[Sten]

Except in Hollyweird any publicity is good publicity.

[Box]

... would it be slander if someone said that Mr Moore was a fat ugly stupid
self-absorbed self-important funny-looking lying-for-personal-gain activist hidding behind a directors chair taking-advantage-of-those-with-more-human-qualities-than-he-could-buy-with-all-of-his-movie-money-shit-bag shitty-movie making fag?


Just curious...

[Bill Harsey]

Originally Posted by Billy L-bach

... would it be slander if someone said that Mr Moore was a fat ugly stupid
self-absorbed self-important funny-looking lying-for-personal-gain activist hidding behind a directors chair taking-advantage-of-those-with-more-human-qualities-than-he-could-buy-with-all-of-his-movie-money-shit-bag shitty-movie making fag?

no.

[Peregrino]

Originally Posted by Billy L-bach

... would it be slander if someone said that Mr Moore was a fat ugly stupid
self-absorbed self-important funny-looking lying-for-personal-gain activist hidding behind a directors chair taking-advantage-of-those-with-more-human-qualities-than-he-could-buy-with-all-of-his-movie-money-shit-bag shitty-movie making fag?


Just curious...

Probably. Unfortunately, it only takes one error to invalidate your entire statement. FWIW, I doubt he's stupid and while he's probably sympathetic to the homosexual adgenda, he's most likely not a "fag" either. Just look at the money he's made exploiting the stupidity of the unwashed masses. And in order to be a practicing sexual being of whichever persuasion, you have to be capable of consumating the act. His physical attributes lend reasonable doubt to your conjecture. You might lose a few points for style too. The remainder of your diatribe listing his other "sterling" qualities seems to be somewhat understated. Peregrino

[Bill Harsey]

Originally Posted by Peregrino

Probably. Unfortunately, it only takes one error to invalidate your entire statement. FWIW, I doubt he's stupid and while he's probably sympathetic to the homosexual adgenda, he's most likely not a "fag" either. Just look at the money he's made exploiting the stupidity of the unwashed masses. And in order to be a practicing sexual being of whichever persuasion, you have to be capable of consumating the act. His physical attributes lend reasonable doubt to your conjecture. You might lose a few points for style too. The remainder of your diatribe listing his other "sterling" qualities seems to be somewhat understated. Peregrino

Billy L-bach was close enough for me.


Because I'm really sensitive about things like this, I hope this discussion doesn't offend Mr. Moore.