Great article tonyz, thanks for posting.
Quote:
|
Think what Mueller’s precedent of not-not-guilty would do to the American criminal-justice system, as zealous prosecutors might fish for just enough dirt on a suspect to ruin his reputation, but not find enough for an indictment, thereby exonerating their own prosecutorial failure by defaming a “guilty until proven innocent” suspect.
|
I believe this tactic has been used for decades in the criminal-justice system. How many high level people have been
accused of rape (years ago) and lost their position and career? How many low level people in possession of some valuable information in regards to some high level persons indiscretions have been raided by the FBI and found to have hard drives full of child porn?
These two things to my eye seem to be so common and so obviously a variation of what Mueller did. It almost seems that if one is in possession of "evidence", then it must logically follow that they must also be in possession of child porn, as if the two are inextricably linked.
Threaded Mode
