Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > At Ease > General Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-16-2017, 05:33   #1
Pineapples
Asset
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 11
Iraqi forces drive Kurds out of Kirkuk

As the title states, the Iraqi forces and state back militias are fighting the Kurds to take back Kirkuk. Being that a lot of you guys have fought alongside both of these groups (unless I am mistaken), I was wondering what all of your opinions are on the matter.

Link to article:

https://www.apnews.com/0b3b6bf13cce47ada980c2170d7b36ac
Pineapples is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2017, 11:43   #2
Pineapples
Asset
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 11
After further reading and building my own opinion on the matter, while sifting through all of the differing "facts" of what is going on, I don't really disagree with Iraq wanting to reestablish control of the area. It was, after all, always their territory. However, they did hold a vote to secede from Iraq, which was opposed by the US (not sure whom exactly, wasn't specified), that according to various media outlets had a major vote for secession. Although, I did find contradicting facts on this as well, some stating the overall vote was heavily in favor, while others saying that the Kurd population was in the vast majority in favor while giving no specifics on the rest of the population.

There is an obvious, huge financial reasoning behind this as well, but do you think the Kurds have right to the land considering they supposedly won the vast majority of the vote to secede, or does Iraq deserves to maintain the land that they abandoned (albeit before they had an adequately trained military)?

Last edited by Pineapples; 10-16-2017 at 14:50.
Pineapples is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2017, 12:10   #3
Pete
Quiet Professional
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fayetteville
Posts: 13,080
Further Reading

Do some further reading on the ethnic populations in Iraq, Turkey and Iran. Then find where the majority of each ethnic population live in each country. Match that to a map that shows the three countries.

Report back with your updated opinion.
Pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2017, 13:09   #4
Pineapples
Asset
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 11
Based on that further reading, my opinion is that although it is and has been a contested area (several maps showing Kirkuk in the Kurdish autonomous region, several not), I fully believe Iraq has a right to the land. The Kurds may have their own region where they have their own parliament and can draft their own laws and what not, but it seems that it's basically on borrowed land from Iraq. Also, given the displacement of the Kurds throughout the surrounding countries, and the overall instability of the whole area due to, well, everything.. it just isn't a wise time to be attempting something like this. They have an argument to be able to regain the territory and create their own official nation, but the tensions are too high for people to be okay with just giving away land, especially as profitable as that area may be. Also, I didn't read about Turkey's stance on the issue until I did what you said, but it makes sense considering the vast majority of Kurds they have in the southeastern part of their own country, and how they're probably worried about a secession themselves. It gives to reason that if they allow Kirkuk to go, others will follow suit, which in turn would cause a great amount of increased instability in the region where they should be coming together to fight the common enemy at hand.

Last edited by Pineapples; 10-16-2017 at 14:52.
Pineapples is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2017, 15:18   #5
scooter
Quiet Professional
 
scooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Tennesse
Posts: 766
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brush Okie View Post
When and how did the country of Iraq come into existance?
This, x 2.

Look up Sykes Picot and the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire, and all the shit that has come from that. The lines on the map are just lines on the map. If the people living there don't agree with them, why are they legitimate?
scooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2017, 15:22   #6
Pineapples
Asset
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 11
Through the unification of the three regions of the Ottoman empire that previously made up the area of Iraq, by the UK right after WW1. Purely for oil. Which were already divided by their religions, so I'm assuming that there has always been disputes for land. Correct me if I'm wrong, I actually haven't seen any info on previous conflicts before the first world war, but the wording kind of suggested it.

I really should have learned this in school growing up.. I apologise for my lack of knowledge.

If you go back in time it was in the Kurdish province, but that's so old and the land has been divvied up several times. I need to read up more, but it seems that as a whole they have not been successfully integrated as the unified country of Iraq ever. Now it's just continuing after they're getting a break from IS.

I appreciate you guys not berating me and pointing me in the proper direction to learn more, thank you.
Pineapples is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2017, 15:24   #7
Pineapples
Asset
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 11
Scooter, I read very briefly on that, I'll check it out soon. Need to go for a run. I'll check back in later today or tomorrow when I get a chance to delve more into the subject
Pineapples is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2017, 15:37   #8
bblhead672
Area Commander
 
bblhead672's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Texas, USA
Posts: 1,647
Short answer is most, if not all, of the countries in the Middle East did not exist in their present form prior to Europeans deciding how to carve up the region. The occupants of the region mostly haven't been happy about that from the beginning, except those who established power and great wealth.
bblhead672 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2017, 04:55   #9
Ret10Echo
Quiet Professional
 
Ret10Echo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Occupied America....
Posts: 4,740
Quote:
Originally Posted by bblhead672 View Post
Short answer is most, if not all, of the countries in the Middle East did not exist in their present form prior to Europeans deciding how to carve up the region. The occupants of the region mostly haven't been happy about that from the beginning, except those who established power and great wealth.
Exactly.

I always point people to read "A Peace to End all Peace" The Fall of the Ottoman Empire and the Creation of the Modern Middle East (0884476569922): by David Fromkin

History does not repeat itself but it often rhymes.
__________________
"There are more instances of the abridgment of freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations"

James Madison
Ret10Echo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2017, 05:26   #10
Pineapples
Asset
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 11
So after some more reading last night and this morning, it seems that Kurdistan had several opportunities to actually become an independent nation, but due to a constant disagreement and lack of trust amongst their own leaders they were never able to get it done. Talks failed during the Paris peace conference around 1920, and now they're still failing to reach agreement on forming an independent Kurdistan due to internal quarrels between the three leaders of the autonomous region who believe the others are more interested in power for themselves rather than a forming a unified Kurdistan

Best article I've found on this so far:

http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/f...er-sykes-picot

Ret10Echo, I'll check out that book

Last edited by Pineapples; 10-17-2017 at 05:32. Reason: Didn't see a recent comment
Pineapples is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2017, 06:09   #11
Pete
Quiet Professional
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fayetteville
Posts: 13,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pineapples View Post
So after some more reading last night and this morning, it seems that Kurdistan had several opportunities to actually become an independent nation, but due to a constant disagreement and lack of trust amongst their own leaders they were never able to get it done. Talks failed during the Paris peace conference around 1920, and now they're still failing to reach agreement on forming an independent Kurdistan due to internal quarrels between the three leaders of the autonomous region who believe the others are more interested in power for themselves rather than a forming a unified Kurdistan.....
So do you blame all this on the Kurds - or the three counties that the Kurds think are occupying their land?

A Kurdish nation would have been land locked and surrounded by hostile nations.
Pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2017, 09:56   #12
Pineapples
Asset
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 11
It's hard for me to say that I blame them entirely, but from what I have gathered every opportunity that they have had to gain independence has been thwarted by a lack of cohesion within the Kurds themselves. Granted, from the most recent article I have been able to find, the three Kurdish governmental parties seem to be working together to pass this referendum. Which it did, but it's not being recognized by any of the surrounding countries.

I'd have to say it used to be the Kurds fault that they didn't become an independent nation, but now they are putting forth the proper effort to work together and form the borders of their country. Unfortunately, due to the opposition of all the surrounding countries they are not being allowed to do so.
Pineapples is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2017, 10:09   #13
Pete
Quiet Professional
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fayetteville
Posts: 13,080
Life is not as easy as it first seems, is it Pineapples?

Now transfer your attention to Spain and Catalonia. How is that different from what we're discussing here?
Pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2017, 10:42   #14
Mustang Man
Guerrilla
 
Mustang Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 286
For those who wish to see a Kurdish nation, keep in mind many of them such as the PKK and YPG factions are staunch marxist-communists.
__________________
"Thanking Obama for killing Bin Laden is like going into McDonalds and thanking Ronald McDonald for the hamburger. It's the guy cooking the burger that should get the credit, not the clown."

BMT
Mustang Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2017, 04:58   #15
Pineapples
Asset
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 11
It's actually the exact same thing that's going on with Catalonia, I didn't even know about that until you mentioned it. Never thought it was easy, but I did not know it was so complicated haha
Pineapples is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 18:30.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies