Oh, I see what you are saying. If you go back and read the article though, they are not saying that there definatley WAS a terrorist with a $10 Million bounty captured (thus giving credibility to the first report). They are saying that a second newsource claimed that "Zarqawi, who had a $10 Million dollar bounty", was captured. Both articles say the same thing I think.
__________________
"If any pale student glued to his desk here seek an apology for a way of life whose natural fruit is that pallid and emasculate scholarship, of which New England has had too many examples, it will be far better that this sketch had not been written. For the student there is, in its season, no better place than the saddle, and no better companion than the rifle or the oar." - Francis Parkman
|