One of the big issues with public perception and policing, anywhere these days, is expectation management regarding use of force and availability/suitability of non-lethal options.
The Chicago mayor is implementing a policy for 100% of patrol officers to carry tasers. I suspect there is already a policy in place where a non-lethal option is carried (OC, ASP, or taser), but due to cost of equipment or training the tasers may be in limited use.
Even on a military installation we have similar challenges. About 2/3 of my Defenders are certified to carry a taser. Having a certified trainer on station is now putting a dent in the other 1/3 that isn't yet qualified. Similarly, lawyers at the Pentagon think body cameras on our cops may be an intel collection issue in the homeland, so they're slow rolling approval. We've procured cameras already at this installation, and I'm bucking the lawyers and directing use as the cameras and gear arrive. Bureacracy cotinues to interfere with prudent evolution of how we do business.
As we roll these changes out, we're engaging our community and educating them on what is changing and why...so far we've had 100% support.
On the big city side, though, how should they effectively prep the battlefield? The public in Chicago will now expect tasers to be the default weapon of choice when a cop shows up to admonish their little angels who are doing wrong. The next cop who drops a criminal with a firearm rather than a taser is going to get tarred and feathered, even if the tactical choice was the right one. Can Chicago, or other big PDs, get ahead of this? From a QP perspective, how should they attempt to educate and sway the public? Start by educating the local journalists?
|