Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > At Ease > The Early Bird

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-26-2015, 07:58   #1
SittingElf
Auxiliary
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Palm Bay, FL
Posts: 66
DefAuthAct - 20yr retirement gone, 1.3% raise, On-Base carry...more

Obama signed the Defense Authorization Act...without a Veto.

Highlights:

New retirement system in force as of 2018. AD with >12 years grandfathered in top-3. <12 years will have choice between two systems. New recruits will be in a hybrid 401K/Thrift Savings system.

Guantanimo to remain open

1.3% Pay raise in January. General and Flag Officers pay freeze

No BRAC actions allowed for two years.

SECDEF required to come up with plan by end of year for base commanders to allow on-base carry.

Retired Military Dog Adoptions to be allowed in CONUS

No Paid Patriotism for Sporting Events.

Develop gender-neutral standards for military jobs.

Sigh........
__________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." -Thomas Jefferson
"Certainly one of the chief guarantees of freedom under any government, no matter how popular and respected, is the right of citizens to keep and bear arms." -Hubert H. Humphrey
"The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom is courage.” – Thucydides.
SittingElf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2015, 08:41   #2
blacksmoke
Like My Mankini?
 
blacksmoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: OH for now
Posts: 437
My non-retirement benefit from 5 years of AD is the GI bill. I am glad that troops already in will have the option of the old plan, I only have about 7 years left. Don't see how this 401k nonsense is going to anything but "save money" for the gov't. Well....
blacksmoke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2015, 08:53   #3
blacksmoke
Like My Mankini?
 
blacksmoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: OH for now
Posts: 437
From Militarytimes:

"In addition to the automatic 1 percent government contribution, the government would provide matching contributions of up to 5 percent of military pay if troops make personal contributions to their accounts.

That means troops could see up to 11 percent of their annual pay flow into their retirement savings every year."

"However, money in these savings plan would not be available without tax penalties before age 59 and a half, a significant departure from the current system that begins payouts immediately upon retirement to troops as young as age 38.

Further, lawmakers will reduce the traditional payouts for individuals who serve 20 years by 20 percent to account for the investment contributions."



Does this mean that regardless, troops retiring after 20+ have to wait until 59 to get their pension?

Last edited by blacksmoke; 11-26-2015 at 08:55. Reason: colors
blacksmoke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2015, 09:05   #4
JJ_BPK
Quiet Professional
 
JJ_BPK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: 18 yrs upstate NY, 30 yrs South Florida, 20 yrs Conch Republic, now chasing G-Kids in NOVA & UK
Posts: 11,901
IRA's can be very productive. I only had 6 yrs contribution when I retired. I retired at 47YO with 30yrs. Our plan was similar, with 12% + matching. I pushed the max into the plan contributions.

I put the money in 1/2 doz mutuals and reorganized yearly. Dropping the worst, keeping the best performers. After I retired I pushed the IRA into a Schwab account. With a little help from their on-line ed system,, it now is a self replenishing pile of money.

YMMV
__________________
Go raibh tú leathuair ar Neamh sula mbeadh a fhios ag an diabhal go bhfuil tú marbh

"May you be a half hour in heaven before the devil knows you’re dead"
JJ_BPK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2015, 09:13   #5
lindy
Guerrilla Chief
 
lindy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ft Benning
Posts: 707
Quote:
Originally Posted by blacksmoke View Post
Does this mean that regardless, troops retiring after 20+ have to wait until 59 to get their pension?
Sounds like Reserve retirement will be the norm now.
__________________
"I see that you notice that I wear glasses. Well, it was to be. I've not only grown old and gray, I've become almost blind in the service of my country." - General George Washington

"There are times in your life you'll be required to perform an exceedingly difficult task to the best of your ability, regardless of your perceived capability. Mental toughness is what will carry the day during these times. In other words, you suck it up and do what you have to do." - Razor
lindy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2015, 10:57   #6
Tree Potato
Guerrilla
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: NoVA
Posts: 171
Authorizing Concealed Carry...well, not really

Prediction: few, if any, installation commanders will authorized concealed carry.

The two reasons installation commanders will be allowed to authorize concealed carry are if they determine it is necessary for personal- or force-protection measures.

How often will an installation commander admit their police or security forces are not able to provide adequate installation security? It's not going to happen, so the force-protection measure option is nearly meaningless for the average CCW permit holder.

The personal-protection option is a little broader, but will likely be constrained similar to how some states issue CCW permits based on state determination of "need". Someone who has a civil restraining order or a military no-contact order with another person who has continuing valid access requirements to a base might be able to convince the installation commander to approve CCW. The average CCW permit holder, though, will likely face steep resistance convincing an installation commander that they "need" to carry on base for personal protection.

Until DoD is told that it will allow concealed carry with possibly only a very narrow option of times when a commander could prohibit carry, it's just not going to happen. People should be allowed to carry on base for the same reasons they carry off base: because the *might* need a weapon for self defense, not because they can demonstrate there's obvious necessity.

Quote:
5 (a) PROCESS REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense,
6 taking into consideration the views of senior leadership of
7 military installations in the United States, shall establish
8 a process by which the commander of a military installa-
9 tion in the United States may authorize a member of the
10 Armed Forces who is assigned to duty at the installation
11 to carry a concealed personal firearm on the installation
12 if the commander determines it to be necessary as a
13 personal- or force-protection measure.
http://amendments-rules.house.gov/am...1237413741.pdf
Tree Potato is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:01.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies