Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > Special Forces Weapons > Weapons Discussion Area

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-13-2013, 08:41   #1
Javadrinker
Guerrilla
 
Javadrinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 293
"Possible" new ATF rules

For those with interest in FFLs, and new illegal rules from ATF...

"For FFLs who maintain a sizeable inventory of any sort of firearms so as to provide customers with a selection, there has long been a concern that ATF may attempt to impose obligations to conduct periodic physical inventories in addition to the paper (or computerized) records of the Acquisition and Disposition (“A&D”) Books. Most FFLs conduct such inventories simply as a matter of good business practice. And when ATF conducts a periodic inspection it is routine to check serial numbers of all firearms in the inventory against the A&D record. The concern of FFLs is not so much with doing an inventory as with (1) the frequency of such an obligation as a physical inventory often means having to close the business for one or more days and (2) having yet more micro-regulation of the business that results in yet more traps to be sprung by over-zealous enforcement authorities.

Sensitive to such concerns, since 2004, Congress has included a provision in ATF’s annual appropriations prohibiting the expenditure of funds on the formulation or implementation of a regulation imposing any such obligation. Because the Government has been operating by continuing resolution after continuing resolution, it requires a bit of cross-reference to illustrate that the limitation remains effective. You can trust me or delve into this footnote.[1]

In light of that prohibition, it was rather surprising to see that the latest semi-annual regulatory agenda (RIN 1140-AA41) indicates that ATF plans to publish a proposed rule on that subject this very month, December 2013. Often entries in the regulatory agenda are little but wishful thinking so that entry alone might not be cause for concern but there is reason to believe the entry is more than fantasy."

http://blog.princelaw.com/2013/12/11...er-rulemaking/
Javadrinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:38.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies