Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > At Ease > The Soapbox

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-23-2013, 12:24   #1
Dusty
RIP Quiet Professional
 
Dusty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Ozarks
Posts: 10,072
Cruz: America Needs a Spiritual Revival

http://blogs.cbn.com/thebrodyfile/ar...spiritual.aspx

Nails it.

In an interview you’ll only see on The Brody File, Sen. Ted Cruz says spiritual revival is needed in America saying, “I think we’re at the edge of a precipice. If we keep going down this path we’re risking losing our nation. We’re risking losing the incredible oasis of liberty.”

The Brody File team spoke to Cruz on Friday in Iowa after he spoken at the Pastors and Pews events in Des Moines. A partial transcription is below along with the video.

David Brody: Do you believe that spiritual revival is needed in this country?

Sen. Ted Cruz: Without a doubt.

I think we’re at the edge of a precipice. If we keep going down this path we’re risking losing our nation. We’re risking losing the incredible oasis of liberty.

Snip
__________________
"There you go, again." Ronald Reagan
Dusty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2013, 12:59   #2
Sdiver
Area Commander
 
Sdiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Black Hills of SD
Posts: 5,944
Not only do we need a spiritual revival, to put it in the vernacular of the time(s), we need to CTRL-ALT-DEL then re-boot.
__________________
Non Sibi Sed Suis
_____________________________________________
It's Good To Be Da King !!!! Just ask NDD !!!!
Sdiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2013, 13:02   #3
tonyz
Area Commander
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 4,792
Seems to fit here as well as any number of places - food for thought...

INEPTOCRACY - (in-ep-toc'-ra-cy) "A system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers."

http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...rm=ineptocracy


AUGUST 1, 2013 12:00 AM

The Death of Populism
Plenty of pleaders for rich and poor, but no politician speaks for the common man.

By Victor Davis Hanson

Occupy Wall Streeters claimed that they were populists. Their ideological opposites, the Tea Partiers, said they were, too. Both became polarizing. And so far populism, whether on the right or left, does not seem to have made inroads with the traditional Republican and Democrat establishments.

Gas has gone up about $2 a gallon since Barack Obama took office. Given average yearly rates of national consumption, that increase alone translates into an extra $1 trillion that American drivers have collectively paid in higher fuel costs over the last 54 months.

Such a crushing burden on the cash-strapped commuter class is rarely cited in the liberal fixation on cap-and-trade, wind and solar subsidies, and the supposed dangers of fracking.

When the president scaled back the number of new gas and oil leases on federal lands over time, or warned that “under my plan of a cap-and-trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket,” he was appealing to his boutique base — not to those who can scarcely meet their monthly heating and cooling bills.

Should there not be an opening for a conservative populist response?

Unfortunately, pro-drilling conservatives sound more like spokesmen for oil companies than grassroots champions for strapped motorists.

Total student debt is approaching $1 trillion. That is an unsustainable burden for recent graduates under 25 facing an adjusted youth unemployment rate of over 20 percent.

Yet the well-off are more interested in ensuring that their children get into tony, name-brand colleges than in fretting about how to pay for it — a fact well known to our price-gouging universities.

On the other end, need- and ethnicity-based scholarships and waivers have made college more affordable for the poor than it is for the middle classes. The parents of the latter make enough to be disqualified from most government help, but not enough to afford soaring tuition.

Top-heavy universities assume that there will always be more income from the subsidized poor and the rich. Again, middle-class students are caught up a creek without the paddles of wealthy parents or a generous government.

There is also a populist argument to be made against the farm bill.

There are more than 48 million Americans on food stamps, an increase of about 12 million since the beginning of the Obama presidency.

At a time of record-high crop prices, the U.S. government still helps well-off farmers with some $20 billion in annual crop payouts and indirect subsidies.

The Left mythicizes food-stamp recipients almost as if they all must be the Cratchits of Dickensian England.

The Right romanticizes corporate agriculture as if the growers all were hardscrabble family farmers in need of a little boost to get through another tough harvest.

Those in between, who pay federal income taxes and are not on food stamps, lack the empathy of the poor and the clout of the rich. Can’t a politician say that?

Illegal immigration is likewise not a Left vs. Right or Republican vs. Democrat issue, but instead mostly one of class.

The influx of millions of illegal immigrants has ensured corporate America access to cheap labor while offering a growing constituency for political and academic elites.

Yet the earning power of poorer American workers — especially African Americans and Hispanic Americans — has stagnated.

The common bond between the agendas of La Raza activists and the corporate world is apparently a relative lack of concern for the welfare of entry-level laborers, many of them in American inner cities, who are competing against millions of illegal workers.

Given the slow-growth, high-unemployment economy, and the policies of the Federal Reserve, interest on simple passbook accounts has all but vanished.

The poor are not so affected. They are more often borrowers than lenders, and they are sometime beneficiaries of federally subsidized debt relief.

The rich have the capital and connections to find more profitable investments in real estate or the stock market that make them immune from pedestrian, underperforming savings accounts.

In other words, this administration’s loose money policy has been good for the indebted and even better for the stock-invested rich. But it is absolutely lousy for the middle class and for strapped retirees with a few dollars in conservative passbook accounts.

The aftermath of the 2008 financial meltdown followed the same script. The crisis arose from a strange connivance between loans to the unqualified and huge profits for Wall Street. Its remedy was to have the lowly taxpayer pick up the walk-away debt of the former while offering bailouts for the latter.

Polls show the president’s approval numbers are tanking. Congress can hardly become any more unpopular. Maybe one reason is that neither seems to care much about those who are not rich and not poor.

America has plenty of community organizers and agitators, and even more smooth corporate lobbyists, but populist politicians disappeared long ago.

— NRO contributor Victor Davis Hanson is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution.

http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...r-davis-hanson
__________________
The function of wisdom is to discriminate between good and evil.

Marcus Tullius Cicero
tonyz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2013, 14:01   #4
SF_BHT
Quiet Professional
 
SF_BHT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sneaking back and forth across the Border
Posts: 6,679
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dusty View Post
http://blogs.cbn.com/thebrodyfile/ar...spiritual.aspx

Nails it.

In an interview you’ll only see on The Brody File, Sen. Ted Cruz says spiritual revival is needed in America saying, “I think we’re at the edge of a precipice. If we keep going down this path we’re risking losing our nation. We’re risking losing the incredible oasis of liberty.”

The Brody File team spoke to Cruz on Friday in Iowa after he spoken at the Pastors and Pews events in Des Moines. A partial transcription is below along with the video.

David Brody: Do you believe that spiritual revival is needed in this country?

Sen. Ted Cruz: Without a doubt.

I think we’re at the edge of a precipice. If we keep going down this path we’re risking losing our nation. We’re risking losing the incredible oasis of liberty.

Snip
His is spot on Dusty....
SF_BHT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2013, 08:39   #5
tonyz
Area Commander
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 4,792
Ted Cruz delivers stemwinder at Iowa’s Reagan Dinner
Politico
By MAGGIE HABERMAN | 10/25/13 11:51 PM EDT

DES MOINES, Iowa – Sen. Ted Cruz exhorted the party faithful at Iowa’s Reagan Dinner Friday to join a grassroots insurgency against the Washington establishment, in a speech at an event that was part fundraiser and part tea party rally.

Cruz (R-Texas), who has achieved newfound fame since the government shutdown, delivered a stemwinder in which he blamed Senate Republicans for not holding the line against Democrats over defunding Obamacare, bashed the Washington consulting class, Obamacare and the media, and called on attendees to join the movement by signing up for his email list.

“I’m convinced we’re facing a new paradigm in politics,” Cruz, who spoke for 45 minutes without notes or a teleprompter, told the crowd of about 600 people at the Iowa Events Center. “It is the rise of the grass roots … it has official Washington absolutely terrified.”

“This new paradigm has been beta-tested, unlike the Obamacare website,” Cruz said to applause. “It was beta-tested in 1980 with the Reagan Revolution and it pulled this country back form the brink.”

The senator and potential 2016 contender defended his futile battle to defund Obamacare — which led to the two-week-plus government shutdown and damaged the GOP’s already suffering national image — that some in his party’s congressional leadership have since called a tactical blunder.

“One of the things we accomplished in the fight over Obamacare is we elevated the national debate over what a disaster, what a train wreck, how much Obamacare is hurting millions of Americans across this country,” Cruz insisted to the crowd.

House Republicans were “a profile in courage [who] stood strong and listened to the American people,” Cruz said, adding that Democrats who voted to give themselves what he called a special exemption on Obamacare would see that move come back to haunt them in ads in the 2014 midterm.

“We didn’t accomplish our ultimate policy goal in this battle and we didn’t because unfortunately a significant number of senate Republicans chose not to unite and stand side by side with House Republicans,” he said. “Had we stood together I’m.convinced the outcome of this fight could have been be very” different.

Cruz insisted he was undeterred, although he didn’t offer a specific alternative to reporters who pressed him after the speech.

“We all understood it was going to be an ongoing effort,” he told the crowd. “In time the [United States] Senate will listen as well to the American people.”

In a reference to the NSA spying scandal, Cruz said, “For anyone who has your cell phones here please them on – I want to make sure President Obama hears everything we say.”

And he saved some of his toughest criticism for the New York Times. “They will tell you this battle accomplished nothing,” Cruz said of the newspaper. “Collectively, we accomplished a great deal. “

In speech after speech, Republican party officials as well as Cruz’s colleague, Sen. Chuck Grassley, rattled sabers and urged the grass roots to stand strong. One official, Christian conservative activist and national committeeman Steve Scheffler, delivered the prayer before the dinner was served, saying Republicans need more officials willing to “basically be crucified” for their beliefs and to take “arrows [to the back] of the head.”

It stood in stark contrast to a speech just before Cruz, delivered by Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad, who called for party unity and invoked Ronald Reagan’s 11th commandment, that Republicans should not criticize one another.

Indeed, this single event – it was the annual fall Reagan Dinner, which the party uses as a showcase of top talent in order to sell tickets – felt very much like a series of different rallies.

Cruz, wearing a body mic, walked back and forth across the dais like a pastor delivering a sermon, similar to how he addressed the crowd at the Value Voters Summit in Washington a few weeks ago. Cruz received a good response from the crowd, but he wasn’t cheered wildly. And his speech, lengthy and meandering, began to lose some of the people in the audience as it went on.

“If you took every Washington strategist and dumped them in the ocean, you know what you’d call it?” he asked, recasting an old joke about lawyers. “A good start.”

He laced into President Barack Obama, saying he had violated almost every amendment that exists in the Constitution.

“Soon they may start ordering soldiers in people’s houses,” he said to a few laughs.

He asked the crowd if they’d watched comedian Jon Stewart interview Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius – “He ripped her apart!” Cruz said of the “liberal comedian,” which the senator said was clear evidence of how awful Obamacare is. And he cited other examples in which the conservative base had helped force the hand of Washington leaders.

They included the vote on a gun-control package after the Newtown shootings last year, the change in approach Obama took toward military action in Syria, and immigration reform.

“When it came time for a vote [on gun control] every single proposal of the president’s that would have undermined the Second Amendment was voted down,” he said. “That was the power of the grass roots.”

The raw anger at Obama among the GOP base, which has raged since the fight over Obamacare, remained palpable.

In his own remarks, Grassley struck a similar theme, saying Obama had used the possibility of a debt default as a “scapegoat” for his own refusal to negotiate.

“We’re not going to let the president of the United States destroy that concept of America,” Grassley said. “America is an idea and you and I have to keep that idea alive.”

Branstad, who’s dealing with a fractured Iowa GOP as he heads into his own reelection effort in 2014, sounded a more soothing note.

“We as conservatives know that it’s going to take all of us working together and fighting the liberal Democrats who control the national’s capital … and the D.C. media that’s attempting to divide us,” Branstad said to polite applause. “I want to do all I can to bring all Republicans together.”

He cited Reagan’s rule of speaking “no ill of other Republicans. We need to be united as a party.” Branstad ticked off a list of governors who he felt have been effective on the Republican side — in contrast to Democratic governors who are now “in prison” — praising John Kasich, Rick Snyder, Rick Perry and Scott Walker. He noticeably omitted the governor coming up for reelection in 11 days, Chris Christie, which he later said was simply because he’d spoken at length and couldn’t name everyone.

Branstad also insisted after the dinner that he didn’t feel Cruz had violated Reagan’s 11th Commandment. Cruz argued the same thing, saying he was not speaking ill of anyone in his comments.

It remains to be seen whether Cruz will run for president, or if he will be able to sustain the enthusiasm he’s generated among the base. Some political operatives have cautioned privately that Cruz can’t be “Palinized” as easily as Sarah Palin herself was, given his position in the Senate and his Ivy League background.

Cruz left the dinner soon after he spoke with reporters, posing for pictures and shaking hands. He was heading north, to a pheasant hunt with conservative Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa). King hosted Perry at the hunt in 2011.

But Cruz declined to get into the issue that was on the minds of reporters and attendees about why he was in Iowa for his third visit that year.

“Are you planting the seeds for a presidential run?” a reporter called out.

<snip>

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/1...#ixzz2ivg0fdUH
__________________
The function of wisdom is to discriminate between good and evil.

Marcus Tullius Cicero
tonyz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:58.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies