04-05-2013, 07:27
|
#1
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Location, Location
Posts: 4,082
|
The Architect of Destruction
March 1, 2013
The Architect of Destruction
By Maureen Scott
"Obama comes from a community organizer background where it's us against them. But that's not who we are. And that's not the position the leader of our Nation should take." – Dr. Benjamin Carson
Obama appears to be a tormented man who is filled with resentment, anger, and disdain for anyone of an opinion or view other than his. He acts in the most hateful, spiteful, malevolent, vindictive ways in order to manipulate and maintain power and control over others. Perhaps because, as a child, he grew up around family members and mentors who instilled him with an abiding bitterness toward the U.S. That bitterness seems not to have left him.
It is not the color of his skin that is a problem – for anyone in America. Rather it is the blackness that fills his soul and the hollowness in his heart where there should be abiding pride and love for this country.
Think: Have we ever heard Obama speak lovingly of the U.S. or its people, with deep appreciation and genuine respect for our history, our customs, our sufferings and our blessings? Has he ever revealed that, like most patriotic Americans, he gets "goose bumps" when a band plays "The Star Spangled Banner," or sheds a tear when he hears a beautiful rendition of "America the Beautiful?" Does his heart burst with pride when millions of American flags wave on a National holiday – or is he moved to sadness and reflection when someone plays "taps" on a trumpet? Has he ever felt the depth of our admiration of the military, as lovers of those who keep America free feel when soldiers march by? It is doubtful – because Obama did not grow up sharing our experiences or our values. He did not sit at the knee of a grandfather or uncle who showed his medals and told of the bravery of his fellow troops as they fought and tramped through foreign lands sacrificing for a cause greater than their own lives. He didn't have grandparents who told stories of suffering and then coming to America, penniless, and the opportunities they had for building a business and life for their children.
Away from this country as a young child, Obama didn't delight in being part of America and its greatness. He wasn't singing our patriotic songs in kindergarten, or standing on the roadside for a holiday parade and eating a hot dog, or lighting sparklers around a campfire on July 4th as fireworks exploded over head, or placing flags on the gravesites of fallen and beloved American heroes.
Rather Obama was separated from all of these experiences. He doesn't really understand us and what it means to be an American. He is void of the basic emotions that most feel regarding this country and is insensitive to the instinctive pride we have in our national heritage. His opinions were formed by those who either envied us or wanted him to devalue the United States and the traditions and patriotism that unite us.
Obama has never given a speech that is filled with calm, reassuring, complimentary, heartfelt statements about all the people in the U.S. Or one that inspires us to be better, grateful, and proud that, in a short time, our country became a leader, and a protector of so many. Quite the contrary, his speeches always degenerate into mocking, ridiculing tirades as he faults our achievements ,along with any of his critics, all for the sake of a laugh, or to bolster his ego. He uses his Office to threaten and create fear while demeaning and degrading anyone who opposes his policies and actions. Unlike a secure leader, who has noble self-esteem and not false confidence, Obama displays a cocky, haughty attitude and a dread of being critiqued.
Mostly, his time seems to be spent causing dissention, unrest, and anxiety among the people rather than uniting us (even though he was presented to us as the "Great Uniter"). He creates chaos for the sake of keeping citizens separated, envious, aggrieved and ready to argue. Under his leadership Americans have been kept on edge, rather than in a state of comfort and security. He incites people to be aggressive toward, disrespectful of, and retaliate against those of differing backgrounds and views. Through such behavior, Obama has lowered the standards for self-control and mature restraint to the level of rowdy, street-fighting gangs. When, instead, he should be raising the bar for people to strive toward becoming more considerate, tolerant, self-disciplined, self-sustaining, and self-assured.
Not a day goes by that he is not attempting to defy our laws, remove our rights, over-ride established procedures, install controversial appointees, enact divisive mandates, and assert a dictatorial form of power.
Never has there been a leader of this great land who used such tactics to harm and hurt the people and this country.
Never have we had a President who spoke with a caustic, evil tongue against the citizenry rather than present himself as a soothing, calming, and trustworthy force.
Never, in this country, have we experienced how much stress one man can cause a nation of people – on a daily basis!
Obama has promoted the degeneration of peace, civility, and quality of cooperation between us. He thrives on tearing us down, rather than building us up. He is the Architect of the decline of America, and the epitome of a Demagogue.
© Maureen Scott
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/scott/130301
A little over the top IMO. Also never say never.
__________________
The two most powerful warriors are patience and time - Leo Tolstoy
It's Never Crowded Along the Extra Mile - Wayne Dyer
WOKE = Willfully Overlooking Known Evil
Last edited by MR2; 04-05-2013 at 07:32.
Reason: Emphisis added
|
|
MR2 is offline
|
|
04-05-2013, 09:32
|
#2
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fayetteville NC
Posts: 3,533
|
Not over the top, hit right on the nose. the most divisive President I have ever seen and that includes all the so called "meanies" of the 70s.
While Carter was an incompetent baffon, this President is malevolent.
__________________
Hold Hard guys
Rick B.
Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit.
Wisdom is knowing it is great on a hamburger but not so great sticking one up your ass.
Author - Richard.
Experience is what you get right after you need it.
Author unknown.
|
|
longrange1947 is offline
|
|
04-05-2013, 13:50
|
#3
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Hope Mills, NC
Posts: 2,819
|
I'm with LR on this one. That's what makes us who we are, woven into our fiber/souls. If it's not woven in, it will unravel. You just can't put it on like a cloak and get the same effect...know what I mean??
__________________
Out of all the places I've been, this is one of'em....
You haven't lived...until you've almost died...
|
|
glebo is offline
|
|
04-05-2013, 14:09
|
#4
|
|
Guerrilla
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Superior's Lakeside.
Posts: 125
|
He seems to be merely a leader as opposed to one who leads. The former is only a title and a position and the latter is someone who establishes an environment that fosters opportunities that allow the whole team / administration succeed.
Maybe im a bit off base but to this young 20 something sees a mere leader in our WH today.
I concur with this author's piece, nailed it.
__________________
...a leader should strive to be an individual of flawless character, technical competence, and moral courage….You start with a cornerstone—honesty—and from there you build character. If you have character, that means the guy you are dealing with can trust you….Character provides a leader with a moral compass that focuses his efforts on the values we cherish: courage, honesty, selflessness, and respect for our fellow man…
SAMUEL W. FLOCA JR.
Colonel, USA, Retired
Courtesy of QP Snaquebite
|
|
theis223 is offline
|
|
04-05-2013, 15:38
|
#5
|
|
Area Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,952
|
Yup, pretty dead on. I see this guy as presiding over a post-American era. His election to office is seen as a reward, not a responsibility for anything. Has there been a core change in the direction of our Nation? Is this what the people in this country really want? I believe the MSM is very happy with things just now.
RF 1
|
|
Red Flag 1 is offline
|
|
04-05-2013, 16:05
|
#6
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 554
|
Well...they voted for him a second time. WTF!
Now I'm gonna cause a bit of a stink to some, but what did you expect from a "African American" of his age. He does not see America the way "White America" sees it. Everything was not hunky dory, from his eyes. Many minorities are taught that they must always prove themselves. And when someone does not agree with you, it makes them think "is it the color of my skin, or is it really my ideals?", "What are they saying behind my back?". It was not so long ago that this country had "colored" benches, bathrooms, etc.
Another thing in my opinion, is the need for some to feel guilt about the fricking past, Its no different than Germans still paying Jews for the holocaust. I know after this guy, there will not be another of any color. How many other Presidents have we had that were controversial i.e. Thomas Jefferson (3rd President) — Jefferson was an opponent of slavery. The problem was, the majority of the country favored slavery. He believed that slavery “presented the greatest threat to the survival of the new American nation.
Everyone keeps pointing out how bad this President is, but no one does anything but write articles. We will sit, and wait, until his time is done. As we do with so many others. Do all these articles and rantings do anything. It causes even more diversity in my opinion. My father taught me pride for my country, my family and my neighborhood, and to do my part to protect this country, from all enemies foreign and domestic.
Young American have a serious issue to go left or right of center. I know its not all color, but it's the basis of his frickin anger issues...my opinion. GO 2016!
__________________
DB
|
|
Dragbag036 is offline
|
|
04-05-2013, 16:41
|
#7
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Hope Mills, NC
Posts: 2,819
|
DB, I don't think young Americans really understand...they sort of "roll with the tide" in most cases. It's the "cool" thing to do. I personally didn't give a crap about politics until I grew up...around 30-35 or so (and that's debateable). Although, I grew up in puritanical New England...(well, it was then) and my grandparents made it through the depression, we saved, re-used, skimped on everything...not wasted or squandered. Which is what most young'uns are used to these days...
__________________
Out of all the places I've been, this is one of'em....
You haven't lived...until you've almost died...
|
|
glebo is offline
|
|
04-05-2013, 17:09
|
#8
|
|
RIP Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Ozarks
Posts: 10,072
|
Bit off more than he can chew with gun control and this:
http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-mone...t-wealthy-iras
President Obama’s budget, to be released next week, will limit how much wealthy individuals – like Mitt Romney – can keep in IRAs and other retirement accounts.
The proposal would save around $9 billion over a decade, a senior administration official said, while also bringing more fairness to the tax code.
The senior administration official said that wealthy taxpayers can currently “accumulate many millions of dollars in these accounts, substantially more than is needed to fund reasonable levels of retirement saving.”
Under the plan, a taxpayer’s tax-preferred retirement account, like an IRA, could not finance more than $205,000 per year of retirement – or right around $3 million this year.
Romney, Obama’s 2012 opponent, had an IRA several to many times that amount, leading to questions about how the former Massachusetts governor was able to squirrel away so much money in that sort of retirement account.
The president’s budget, expected Wednesday, has several revenue-raising proposals that come as Democrats and Republicans continue to spar over whether more tax increases are needed to reduce deficits.
Obama’s framework also includes higher taxes on cigarettes, as a way to pay for expanded access to pre-kindergarten. Congressional tax writers in both parties and both chambers are currently examining the code in hopes of a broad tax-reform package.
Snip
__________________
"There you go, again." Ronald Reagan
|
|
Dusty is offline
|
|
04-05-2013, 17:32
|
#9
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 554
|
Which is what most young'uns are used to these days...
I here ya G. But was that suppose to be in pink?
I guess growing up in Texas, and the lessons learned from my parents, made me think of politics sooner (20-25). Now that could also be because of the decade. I came in the army when we had Panama, Desert Storm, Bosnia/Macedonia, etc... And my parents didn't have much, or grow up with much. They were "American of color" but never taught us to rely on anyone, for anything, nor wait for a frickin handout "Arbeit macht frie"
__________________
DB
|
|
Dragbag036 is offline
|
|
04-05-2013, 17:57
|
#10
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,511
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dusty
http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-mone...t-wealthy-iras
President Obama’s budget, to be released next week, will limit how much wealthy individuals – like Mitt Romney – can keep in IRAs and other retirement accounts.
The proposal would save around $9 billion over a decade, a senior administration official said, while also bringing more fairness to the tax code.
The senior administration official said that wealthy taxpayers can currently “accumulate many millions of dollars in these accounts, substantially more than is needed to fund reasonable levels of retirement saving.”
Under the plan, a taxpayer’s tax-preferred retirement account, like an IRA, could not finance more than $205,000 per year of retirement – or right around $3 million this year.
Romney, Obama’s 2012 opponent, had an IRA several to many times that amount, leading to questions about how the former Massachusetts governor was able to squirrel away so much money in that sort of retirement account.
The president’s budget, expected Wednesday, has several revenue-raising proposals that come as Democrats and Republicans continue to spar over whether more tax increases are needed to reduce deficits.
Obama’s framework also includes higher taxes on cigarettes, as a way to pay for expanded access to pre-kindergarten. Congressional tax writers in both parties and both chambers are currently examining the code in hopes of a broad tax-reform package.
Snip
|
"Fair and reasonable," the mantra of losers.
|
|
ddoering is offline
|
|
04-05-2013, 18:06
|
#11
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,989
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dusty
The senior administration official said that wealthy taxpayers can currently “accumulate many millions of dollars in these accounts, substantially more than is needed to fund reasonable levels of retirement saving.”
|
Who the f--- are they, or anyone, to tell anyone else what is "needed to fund reasonable levels of retirement savings."
That has to be one of the most communist things I have heard come from their mouths.
Arrogant f---s
__________________
"Were you born a fat, slimy, scumbag, puke, piece 'o shit, Private Pyle, or did you have to work at it?" - GySgt Hartman
|
|
sinjefe is offline
|
|
04-05-2013, 18:13
|
#12
|
|
Area Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,952
|
My big worry is that the very fabric of our nation is changing. My take today, is that the very fabric, the voters, of our nation has alrready changed. We are so far away from the, " Great Generation", that we will never again see that kind of national pride, ever again. We are being divided by economic means, racial issues, gender issues, right to life issues , second Amendment threats, etc., and we may never see our way back to a patriotic nation.
My second big worry is yet another term of this administration. Wanna bet when that starts to be pushed for? With the present backing of every media outlet, save Fox, the press would love to beat that drum. His best support during the last election, came from th MSM. Another four to eight years of obama, what a story. Convince me that the current admiinistration is not working that very issue today. Convince me tthat it would never happen.
RF 1
|
|
Red Flag 1 is offline
|
|
04-05-2013, 19:58
|
#13
|
|
Guerrilla
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Behind Enemy Lines
Posts: 370
|
This quote is taken from a speech Nikita Khrushchev made before the U.N. in the early years of the Cold War. "America will fall without a shot being fired. It will fall from within."
__________________
It is those who believe that written constitutions can protect the individual from the exercise of state power who
hold to a baseless idealism, particularly when it is the state’s judicial powers of interpretation that define the range of such authority.
J. Albert Nock
Don’t let facts interfere with your insanity
|
|
Stiletto11 is offline
|
|
04-05-2013, 20:08
|
#14
|
|
Area Commander
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Occupied Wokeville
Posts: 4,653
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dusty
http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-mone...t-wealthy-iras
President Obama’s budget, to be released next week, will limit how much wealthy individuals – like Mitt Romney – can keep in IRAs and other retirement accounts.
The proposal would save around $9 billion over a decade, a senior administration official said, while also bringing more fairness to the tax code.
The senior administration official said that wealthy taxpayers can currently “accumulate many millions of dollars in these accounts, substantially more than is needed to fund reasonable levels of retirement saving.”
Under the plan, a taxpayer’s tax-preferred retirement account, like an IRA, could not finance more than $205,000 per year of retirement – or right around $3 million this year.
Romney, Obama’s 2012 opponent, had an IRA several to many times that amount, leading to questions about how the former Massachusetts governor was able to squirrel away so much money in that sort of retirement account.
The president’s budget, expected Wednesday, has several revenue-raising proposals that come as Democrats and Republicans continue to spar over whether more tax increases are needed to reduce deficits.
Obama’s framework also includes higher taxes on cigarettes, as a way to pay for expanded access to pre-kindergarten. Congressional tax writers in both parties and both chambers are currently examining the code in hopes of a broad tax-reform package.
Snip
|
That is just the beginning, there will be more to come and it will come out of the middle class.
They gotta pay for underfunded liabilities like this
Quote:
|
The unfunded liability of the federal government’s pension systems exploded in fiscal 2011 to $761.5 billion dollars — an increase of $139 billion from its fiscal 2010 deficit.
|
http://www.federaltimes.com/article/...ties-skyrocket
__________________
Quote:
|
When a man dies, if nothing is written, he is soon forgotten.
|
|
|
Paslode is offline
|
|
04-06-2013, 07:37
|
#15
|
|
RIP Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Ozarks
Posts: 10,072
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sinjefe
Who the f--- are they, or anyone, to tell anyone else what is "needed to fund reasonable levels of retirement savings."
That has to be one of the most communist things I have heard come from their mouths.
Arrogant f---s
|
Parallels Cyprus.
__________________
"There you go, again." Ronald Reagan
|
|
Dusty is offline
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:34.
|
|
|