Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > At Ease > The Soapbox

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-03-2004, 12:44   #1
shootandloot
Asset
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Baghdad
Posts: 41
Fate of POTUSs Future Judicial Nominees

What do you guys think of the future round of judicial nominees (Fed District, Supreme Court, etc.)? With a 55-44-1 advantage to the Republicans, it would seem to be no problem, but Arlen Specter from my home state of Pennsylvania is to become to Chairman of the Judiciary Committee and he has a reputation for blocking conservative judges such as Robert Bork. What, if any, bearing will this have over the next four years?
__________________
Casey J.
______________________________

"America is the land of the free because it is the home of the brave." ~Ronald Reagan
shootandloot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 17:52   #2
Roguish Lawyer
Consigliere
 
Roguish Lawyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland (at last)
Posts: 8,845
It will be a tough fight pretty much no matter what. The question is whether he's going to make it a priority or be a puss like he was for much of his first term.
Roguish Lawyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 18:15   #3
The Reaper
Quiet Professional
 
The Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland
Posts: 24,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roguish Lawyer
It will be a tough fight pretty much no matter what. The question is whether he's going to make it a priority or be a puss like he was for much of his first term.
I agree.

If they don't want to play ball, shove the bat up their asses.

Start appointing them during breaks as soon as they filibuster the first one and refuse to let the vote come to the floor.

Can you appoint SCOTUS Justices during Congressional recesses as well?

TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910

De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
The Reaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 18:16   #4
Roguish Lawyer
Consigliere
 
Roguish Lawyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland (at last)
Posts: 8,845
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Reaper
I agree.

If they don't want to play ball, shove the bat up their asses.

Start appointing them during breaks as soon as they filibuster the first one and refuse to let the vote come to the floor.

Can you appoint SCOTUS Justices during Congressional recesses as well?

TR
You can do recess appointments, but I think what is necessary is holding their bills hostage until they allow confirmation. No projects in their districts, that sort of thing. Better yet, punitive stuff like closing facilities in their districts if they don't confirm.
Roguish Lawyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2004, 18:35   #5
rubberneck
Area Commander
 
rubberneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Buckingham, Pa.
Posts: 1,746
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roguish Lawyer
You can do recess appointments, but I think what is necessary is holding their bills hostage until they allow confirmation. No projects in their districts, that sort of thing. Better yet, punitive stuff like closing facilities in their districts if they don't confirm.
I think you'll see them try to cherry pick those 5-10 Southern (or otherwise red state) US Senators running for re-election in '06. If the past election shows us anything its that Bush owns the south and he should use that pressure into getting moderate/conservative Senators to play ball or else.
rubberneck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2004, 10:03   #6
shootandloot
Asset
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Baghdad
Posts: 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roguish Lawyer
You can do recess appointments, but I think what is necessary is holding their bills hostage until they allow confirmation. No projects in their districts, that sort of thing. Better yet, punitive stuff like closing facilities in their districts if they don't confirm.
What's a recess appointment? Does that mean they can appoint a Federal Judge during a congressional recess without it coming to a vote on the floor? Or is it a appointment made right before a recess so there isn't a long floor debate on it (i.e., making a appointment right before Christmas break)? Thank you for the responses.
__________________
Casey J.
______________________________

"America is the land of the free because it is the home of the brave." ~Ronald Reagan
shootandloot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2004, 16:24   #7
1026
Asset
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by shootandloot
What's a recess appointment? Does that mean they can appoint a Federal Judge during a congressional recess without it coming to a vote on the floor?
Article II, Section 2, Clause 3, U. S. Constitution: The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.
1026 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2004, 10:02   #8
shootandloot
Asset
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Baghdad
Posts: 41
Thanks 1026
__________________
Casey J.
______________________________

"America is the land of the free because it is the home of the brave." ~Ronald Reagan
shootandloot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2004, 11:50   #9
Roguish Lawyer
Consigliere
 
Roguish Lawyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland (at last)
Posts: 8,845
LMAO:

XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX SUN NOV 07, 2004 19:02:37 ET XXXXX

BUSH CONSIDERS CLARENCE THOMAS FOR CHIEF JUSTICE

**Exclusive**

President Bush has launched an internal review of the pros and cons of nominating Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas as the chief justice if ailing William Rehnquist retires, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.

A top White House source familiar with Bush's thinking explains the review of Thomas as chief justice is one of several options currently under serious consideration. But Thomas is Bush's personal favorite to take the position, the source claims.

"It would not only be historic, to nominate a minority as chief justice, symbolizing the president's strong belief in hope and optimism, but it would be a sound judicial move.... Justice Thomas simply has an extraordinary record."

One concern is the amount of political capital Bush would have to spend in congress to make the move.

A chief justice must be separately nominated by Bush and confirmed by the Senate, even if the person is already sitting on the court.

The need to replace Rehnquist could arise by year's end, Bush aides now believe.

Officially, Bush advisers call any Supreme Court vacancy talk premature.

Developing...
Roguish Lawyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2004, 15:01   #10
Roguish Lawyer
Consigliere
 
Roguish Lawyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland (at last)
Posts: 8,845
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/....ap/index.html

Frist: Judicial filibusters must stop
Senate majority leader may press again for rules changes
Friday, November 12, 2004 Posted: 9:55 AM EST (1455 GMT)

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist on Thursday urged Democrats to stop blocking President Bush's federal court nominees and hinted that he may try to change Senate rules to thwart their delaying tactics.

"One way or another, the filibuster of judicial nominees must end," Frist, R-Tennessee, said in a speech to the Federalist Society, a conservative legal group.

The Democrats' ability to stall White House picks for the federal bench was one of the most contentious issues of Bush's first term. Despite the GOP majority in the Senate, Democrats used the threat of a filibuster to block 10 of Bush's nominees to federal appeals courts. The Senate confirmed more than 200 of the president's choices.

Republicans hope their gain of four seats on Election Day will discourage Democrats from using filibusters again. But in a Senate next year with 55 Republicans, 44 Democrats and a Democrat-leaning independent, Democrats still will have the 40 votes necessary to uphold a filibuster.

Frist said filibustering judicial nominees is "radical. It is dangerous and it must be overcome. The Senate must be allowed to confirm judges who fairly, justly and independently interpret the law."

"The Senate cannot allow the filibuster of circuit court nominees to continue." Frist said. "Nor can we allow the filibuster to extend to potential Supreme Court nominees."

Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, 80, is seriously ill with thyroid cancer, and three other justices have had cancer. The average age of the nine court members is 70. Speculation on a Supreme Court retirement has grown in part because there has been no vacancy in more than 10 years.

The Bush's administration's former chief lawyer at the high court told the organization earlier Thursday that "any attempted new appointment to the court, especially that of a chief justice, will set off a political firestorm."

Theodore Olson added, "The presidential election was merely about the next four years. A Supreme Court justice is for life. It will not be pretty." Olson, who represented Bush before the Supreme Court in Bush v. Gore four years ago and then became solicitor general after Bush took office, predicted that the president would get to name as many as three justices during his second term.

Frist previously has advocated changing Senate rules to make it more difficult to continue a filibuster. While the idea went nowhere in the current Congress, Frist raised it again in his speech, saying that judicial filibusters were "nothing less than a formula for tyranny by the minority."

"The Senate now faces a choice: Either we accept a new and destructive practice or we act to restore constitutional balance," he said.

To block some of Bush's nominees, Democrats have used procedures that required Republicans to come up with 60 votes to advance the president's choices. It takes 60 votes in the 100-member Senate to break a filibuster, meaning some Democrats would have to side with Republicans.

Olson reminded the group of what he called malicious attacks on previous conservative nominees Clarence Thomas and Robert Bork. Thomas, named by Bush's father, was narrowly approved. Bork, a Reagan choice, was rejected.

"It could easily be worse next time around," Olson said.

Olson has been mentioned as a possible high court pick, but his confirmation for solicitor general was rocky.
Roguish Lawyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:07.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies