Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > At Ease > The Soapbox

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-28-2013, 21:44   #1
Paslode
Area Commander
 
Paslode's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Occupied Wokeville
Posts: 4,644
"Made in Kansas"

The next few years are going to be interesting.

Quote:
A personal firearm, a firearm accessory or ammunition that
is owned or manufactured commercially or privately in Kansas and that
remains within the borders of Kansas is not subject to any federal law,
treaty, federal regulation, or federal executive action, including any federal
firearm or ammunition registration program, under the authority of
congress to regulate interstate commerce. It is declared by the legislature
that those items have not traveled in interstate commerce. This section
applies to a firearm, a firearm accessory or ammunition that is owned or
manufactured in the state of Kansas.
If I read it correctly and if it passes, a Kansas resident will be able to purchase a 'Made in Kansas' SBR, SBS or Suppressor without going through NFA.


http://www.kslegislature.org/li/b201...asures/hb2199/
__________________
Quote:
When a man dies, if nothing is written, he is soon forgotten.
Paslode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2013, 03:13   #2
JJ_BPK
Quiet Professional
 
JJ_BPK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: 18 yrs upstate NY, 30 yrs South Florida, 20 yrs Conch Republic, now chasing G-Kids in NOVA & UK
Posts: 11,901
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paslode View Post
If I read it correctly and if it passes, a Kansas resident will be able to purchase a 'Made in Kansas' SBR, SBS or Suppressor without going through NFA.
If I remember correctly, something similar was tried when the last Black Weapon Ban was enacted.. not sure it every made prime time??

Sure would be nice..
__________________
Go raibh tú leathuair ar Neamh sula mbeadh a fhios ag an diabhal go bhfuil tú marbh

"May you be a half hour in heaven before the devil knows you’re dead"
JJ_BPK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2013, 04:11   #3
PedOncoDoc
Area Commander
 
PedOncoDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Northeast Utah
Posts: 1,712
Cross this thread with the 3D printing thread and you have an interesting small business (or personal force multiplication) concept.
__________________
‎"The dignity of man is not shattered in a single blow, but slowly softened, bent, and eventually neutered. Men are seldom forced to act, but are constantly restrained from acting. Such power does not destroy outright, but prevents genuine existence. It does not tyrannize immediately, but it dampens, weakens, and ultimately suffocates, until the entire population is reduced to nothing better than a flock of timid, uninspired animals, of which the government is shepherd." - Alexis de Tocqueville
PedOncoDoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2013, 09:59   #4
dfirsty
Asset
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 47
I believe Montana also did this a few years ago. I like that in the bill it lists just about every part that Frankenstien's bill would ban and makes it legal in Kansas. As long as you had a lower when a federal ban took effect, you could have a class 7 FFL assemble your rifle and it would be legal. It seems odd that Sec. 9 of the bill was scratched. That section stated that no doctors, other than psychiatrists, could ask about firearms in the home prior to providing treatment.

Derek
dfirsty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2013, 12:22   #5
Aknazer
Asset
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Beale AFB
Posts: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by dfirsty View Post
I believe Montana also did this a few years ago. I like that in the bill it lists just about every part that Frankenstien's bill would ban and makes it legal in Kansas. As long as you had a lower when a federal ban took effect, you could have a class 7 FFL assemble your rifle and it would be legal. It seems odd that Sec. 9 of the bill was scratched. That section stated that no doctors, other than psychiatrists, could ask about firearms in the home prior to providing treatment.

Derek
It probably has to do with the first amendment. While doctors shouldn't be forced to ask such questions, preventing them from asking such things could be viewed as unconstitutional.
Aknazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:11.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies