02-10-2012, 21:01
|
#1
|
|
Asset
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Eglin FL
Posts: 1
|
socom as a indapendant branch of service
Gents,
While at the team room a conversation came up which I was told that there may be a possibility that USSOCOM may one day become a branch of service. This of course sparked my interest so after conducting a search on open sources (which turnedup nothing) I decided to open a post to see if anyone has heard anything of the sort, and possibly clarify that the thusfar rumor is in fact a real possibility.
Thanks,
duce400
|
|
duce400 is offline
|
|
02-10-2012, 21:23
|
#2
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fayetteville NC
Posts: 3,533
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by duce400
Gents,
While at the team room a conversation came up which I was told that there may be a possibility that USSOCOM may one day become a branch of service. This of course sparked my interest so after conducting a search on open sources (which turnedup nothing) I decided to open a post to see if anyone has heard anything of the sort, and possibly clarify that the thusfar rumor is in fact a real possibility.
Thanks,
duce400
|
That is why USSOCOM exists, as an answer to the desire of some to have a separate but equal branch. It has been proposed for over a decade. I doubt seriously if it ever goes very far. The branches like the money they get for Spec Opns Forces.
__________________
Hold Hard guys
Rick B.
Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit.
Wisdom is knowing it is great on a hamburger but not so great sticking one up your ass.
Author - Richard.
Experience is what you get right after you need it.
Author unknown.
|
|
longrange1947 is offline
|
|
02-10-2012, 21:34
|
#3
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 15,370
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by duce400
...possibility that USSOCOM may one day become a branch of service...
|
I have mixed feelings on that one - in a Praetorian Guard sense, that is.
And so it goes...
Richard
__________________
“Sometimes the Bible in the hand of one man is worse than a whisky bottle in the hand of (another)… There are just some kind of men who – who’re so busy worrying about the next world they’ve never learned to live in this one, and you can look down the street and see the results.” - To Kill A Mockingbird (Atticus Finch)
“Almost any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.” - Robert Heinlein
|
|
Richard is offline
|
|
02-11-2012, 02:29
|
#4
|
|
Like My Mankini?
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: OH for now
Posts: 437
|
I wonder what basic would be like.
|
|
blacksmoke is offline
|
|
02-11-2012, 06:27
|
#5
|
|
BANNED USER
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,751
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by duce400
Gents,
I decided to open a post to see if anyone has heard anything of the sort, and possibly clarify that the thusfar rumor is in fact a real possibility.
Thanks,
duce400
|
And with your very first post. No, Thank you.
Firers, Watch your lanes.
|
|
Dozer523 is offline
|
|
02-11-2012, 08:00
|
#6
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Atlantas
Posts: 138
|
Duce,
Intro,
fast eddie sends
|
|
fasteddie565 is offline
|
|
02-11-2012, 08:23
|
#7
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fayetteville NC
Posts: 3,533
|
Thank you Dozer, I had not even noticed.
Duce400, read welcome packet, post intro.
Thank you.
__________________
Hold Hard guys
Rick B.
Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit.
Wisdom is knowing it is great on a hamburger but not so great sticking one up your ass.
Author - Richard.
Experience is what you get right after you need it.
Author unknown.
|
|
longrange1947 is offline
|
|
02-11-2012, 08:33
|
#8
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 15,370
|
Guys,
Thanks for the help but we've already sent him a PM w/link to the intro instructions - let's leave the available space for commenting on the topic of the thread. 
Appreciatively,
Richard
__________________
“Sometimes the Bible in the hand of one man is worse than a whisky bottle in the hand of (another)… There are just some kind of men who – who’re so busy worrying about the next world they’ve never learned to live in this one, and you can look down the street and see the results.” - To Kill A Mockingbird (Atticus Finch)
“Almost any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.” - Robert Heinlein
|
|
Richard is offline
|
|
02-11-2012, 13:05
|
#9
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,952
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by longrange1947
Quote:
Originally Posted by duce400
Gents,
While at the team room a conversation came up which I was told that there may be a possibility that USSOCOM may one day become a branch of service. This of course sparked my interest so after conducting a search on open sources (which turnedup nothing) I decided to open a post to see if anyone has heard anything of the sort, and possibly clarify that the thusfar rumor is in fact a real possibility.
Thanks,
duce400
|
That is why USSOCOM exists, as an answer to the desire of some to have a separate but equal branch. It has been proposed for over a decade. I doubt seriously if it ever goes very far. The branches like the money they get for Spec Opns Forces.
|
I think it goes back further than that. It was debated in 1986 when Goldwater-Nichols was still working its way through Congress. USSOCOM was a compromise - a combatant command like the others created under the Act, but not quite like the the others. If you look at Chapter 6 of Title 10 of the US Code, you see that when the combatant commands were created, SOCOM was given its own special role and authority (Title 10, Section 167) beyond the other commands. In acquisition matters, for example, the commander of SOCOM has the same authority as the Secretaries of the Army, Navy and Air Force.
But it was a compromise, and tensions continue to exist, so every few years the debate comes up again. For example, SOCOM has the authority to develop special operations doctrine and to train assigned forces, and to "monitor" the professional development of special operations officers, so there is inevitable tension between SOCOM and TRADOC over various issues and between SOCOM and HRC/PERSCOM over others.
I think in recent years the debate, such that it is, has been more about the role JSOC than SOCOM as a whole.
By the way, duce400, as a somewhat nitpicky aside, while your original post is a fairly well-written and logical query, your topic title has so many grammatical errors it makes baby Jesus cry. I know there are probably almost as many grammar Nazis as bad grammarians on the Internet, and nobody's perfect, but you need to show more attention to detail, especially if you want to be taken seriously on a professional forum, rather than a Facebook wall.
|
|
Airbornelawyer is offline
|
|
02-12-2012, 10:38
|
#10
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: 11 miles from Dove Creek, Colorady
Posts: 3,924
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard
I have mixed feelings on that one - in a Praetorian Guard sense, that is.
And so it goes...
Richard 
|
Ditto...and a few others in history.
__________________
"...But if it be a sin to covet honour,
I am the most offending soul alive."
Shakespeare - Henry V
Lazy Bob Ranch
|
|
Utah Bob is offline
|
|
02-12-2012, 11:31
|
#11
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fayetteville
Posts: 13,080
|
Too Many SOCs...
.................................Not enough shoes.
If SOF becomes it's own branch then what?
Does that Branch recruit from the other branches or recruit off the street? As a branch it will still need a lot of non-SOF slots/jobs.
As all SOF troops go to SOF you don't think each branch will try and form SOF "light" like units?
Think it would lead to more or less Generals, CSMs, staffs and HQs?
|
|
Pete is offline
|
|
02-13-2012, 13:47
|
#12
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orange, Ca.
Posts: 4,950
|
Adm McRaven was asking for more autonomy over SOF Missions, being able to pick and choose who, where and what SOF does. I don't think that is a good idea. Regional commanders not being consulted about ops in their AO? That could be dangerous for civilians, conventional troops and SOF doing the mission...
Last edited by mark46th; 02-13-2012 at 14:15.
|
|
mark46th is offline
|
|
02-13-2012, 14:06
|
#13
|
|
Asset
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Covington, Georgia
Posts: 15
|
Report: Top Spec Ops Officer Seeks New Powers
|
|
Renegade is offline
|
|
02-13-2012, 15:21
|
#14
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fayetteville NC
Posts: 3,533
|
__________________
Hold Hard guys
Rick B.
Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit.
Wisdom is knowing it is great on a hamburger but not so great sticking one up your ass.
Author - Richard.
Experience is what you get right after you need it.
Author unknown.
|
|
longrange1947 is offline
|
|
02-15-2012, 19:56
|
#15
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 120
|
Seriously?
I've always considered myself quite "indapendent," maybe they will have a spot for me. I'm guessing you were going for "deuce" as a screen name and weren't trying to pay homage to Mussolini. If that's the case you can use this mix up as a chance to have a fresh start here. Read a bit to get a feel for how stuff goes around here first. Good luck!
|
|
turboprop is offline
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:51.
|
|
|