01-04-2011, 14:01
|
#1
|
Asset
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Iowa
Posts: 0
|
Question about SF pipeline in late 1970s
There is great information here and elsewhere about the current Army SF training pipeline. However I am having trouble finding information about a specific historical period.
I am interested in the time from 1977 to 1980.
What were the options for a high school graduate in 1977 who wanted to enlist and to join army sf?
Was there something like the 18x enlistment option in this period?
|
TBinIowa is offline
|
|
01-04-2011, 14:15
|
#2
|
RIP Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Ozarks
Posts: 10,072
|
I joined in '78 on a Ranger option that routed me through BCT to 11B AIT to Jump School to RIP, but I broke an ankle during AIT and got sent to the 101st.
I think you could do the same thing for SF at that time (VOLAR).
__________________
"There you go, again." Ronald Reagan
|
Dusty is offline
|
|
01-04-2011, 14:17
|
#3
|
Guest
|
There have always been "SF babies" to some level.
|
|
|
01-04-2011, 14:38
|
#4
|
Asset
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Iowa
Posts: 0
|
Thanks for the quick reply gentlemen.
A follow-up question for clarification: A 1977 high school graduate could have enlisted in 1977, separated from the service in 1980 and earned the right to wear the green beret in between?
Thanks again for taking the time.
|
TBinIowa is offline
|
|
01-04-2011, 14:49
|
#5
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,987
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wet dog
There have always been "SF babies" to some level.
|
Around, yes. Allowed to come straight in, no. From about 1985 until Dec 2001, you had to be at least an E-5 in the Regular Army, though they would waiver that to an E-4 (P) for Medics and Commo guys. In Dec 2001, they opened it up to 18Xs
http://www.training.sfahq.com/qualifications.htm
__________________
"Were you born a fat, slimy, scumbag, puke, piece 'o shit, Private Pyle, or did you have to work at it?" - GySgt Hartman
|
sinjefe is offline
|
|
01-04-2011, 14:58
|
#6
|
Guest
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sinjefe
Around, yes. Allowed to come straight in, no. From about 1985 until Dec 2001, you had to be at least an E-5 in the Regular Army, though they would waiver that to an E-4 (P) for Medics and Commo guys. In Dec 2001, they opened it up to 18Xs
http://www.training.sfahq.com/qualifications.htm
|
Exactly my point.
|
|
|
01-04-2011, 15:29
|
#7
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 15,370
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TBinIowa
A follow-up question for clarification: A 1977 high school graduate could have enlisted in 1977, separated from the service in 1980 and earned the right to wear the green beret in between?
|
Yep. Why the question?
Richard
__________________
“Sometimes the Bible in the hand of one man is worse than a whisky bottle in the hand of (another)… There are just some kind of men who – who’re so busy worrying about the next world they’ve never learned to live in this one, and you can look down the street and see the results.” - To Kill A Mockingbird (Atticus Finch)
“Almost any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.” - Robert Heinlein
|
Richard is offline
|
|
01-04-2011, 19:26
|
#8
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: St. Pauls, NC
Posts: 2,668
|
1n September of 1977 I enlisted in the Regular Army and went straight from Basic to Ait to Airborne and right into SF training. Two days after arriving at selection my group was sent straight to Phase I. From there on it was pretty much back to back Phase II and Phase III.
At the end of the graduation ceremony someone stood up in the back of the auditorium and asked who wanted to go to DLI for language school. Those of us who volunteered were sent to DLI to study various languages, mine happened to be Spanish and 7 months later I was assigned to 5th GP where as a PFC I held the E7 Heavy Weapons slot which was in March of 1979.
Definitely not the way to do it but at least I learned from the best (quite a few Vietnam Vets in that time frame).
So the answer to your question is "YES".
Last edited by alelks; 01-04-2011 at 19:47.
|
alelks is offline
|
|
01-04-2011, 19:37
|
#9
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orange, Ca.
Posts: 4,941
|
I was one of those SF Babies. I was drafted in July of 1970, Enlisted after talking to an SF recruiter while waiting for Basic Training to start. Went through Basic and AIT at Fort Ord July- December '71, went to Jump School in January 71, Phase I at CMK, Phase II(Commo)and Phase III, graduating in May 1971. Assigned to 5thSFG(A) at Fort Bragg.
|
mark46th is offline
|
|
01-04-2011, 19:46
|
#10
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Occupied Pineland
Posts: 4,701
|
Yes. Where does everybody think the term SF Baby originated? It's not new.
My experience in 78 included a number of classmates who were "SF Babies"; straight off the street. A few of them went on to become storied CSMs; others did their duty, quietly rising to positions of trust/responsibility. Some did their time and left after one tour and some were spectacular failures - whether they left early or late. They measured up just like the current generation will 20+ years from now when somebody looks back to "see how it went".
__________________
A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.
~ Marcus Tullius Cicero (42B.C)
|
Peregrino is offline
|
|
01-05-2011, 07:56
|
#11
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Ft. Bragg
Posts: 2,908
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peregrino
Yes. Where does everybody think the term SF Baby originated?
|
I thought it was because they whined about how much harder it was during their time.
Seriously though they were still around when I went through in '89...they were just called Rep 63s.
__________________
"Somebody should put that quote on a T-shirt:
Muslim phrase: "Aloha Snackbar!"
English translation: "Draw, Mother-F*cker!""
-TOMAHAWK9521
|
1stindoor is offline
|
|
01-05-2011, 08:54
|
#12
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,987
|
Rep 63 was a NG thing.
__________________
"Were you born a fat, slimy, scumbag, puke, piece 'o shit, Private Pyle, or did you have to work at it?" - GySgt Hartman
|
sinjefe is offline
|
|
01-05-2011, 09:37
|
#13
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Ft. Bragg
Posts: 2,908
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sinjefe
Rep 63 was a NG thing.
|
Roger, and as soon as the guy graduated and went from the NG to active duty...you had the exact same thing.
__________________
"Somebody should put that quote on a T-shirt:
Muslim phrase: "Aloha Snackbar!"
English translation: "Draw, Mother-F*cker!""
-TOMAHAWK9521
|
1stindoor is offline
|
|
01-05-2011, 11:04
|
#14
|
RIP Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Ozarks
Posts: 10,072
|
Regardless, nobody had it easier than we did back in '83 with Bad Bob at Mackall.
No ruck runs, flashlights allowed during night land nav, and the Runnin' Chef in the compound every night.
__________________
"There you go, again." Ronald Reagan
|
Dusty is offline
|
|
01-06-2011, 16:25
|
#15
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 4,510
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard
Yep. Why the question?
|
Exactly. Information this specific would be interesting to someone trying to sniff out a poser, or perhaps beef up a poser's resume.
|
Razor is offline
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:27.
|
|
|