10-31-2010, 00:05
|
#2
|
Asset
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SW side of Illinois, Chicago.
Posts: 12
|
"Karzai says, 'Not so fast my friend.'"
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-11659814
Afghan President Hamid Karzai has criticised the first joint operation by Russian and US agents to destroy drug laboratories in his country. Mr Karzai said he had not been informed of Russia's participation - a sensitive issue in Afghanistan ever since the Soviet occupation ended 21 years ago. He called it a violation of Afghan sovereignty and international law. Russia said more than a tonne of heroin and opium, with a street value of $250m (£157m), was destroyed in the raid. Officials in Moscow have in the past accused coalition forces in Afghanistan of doing little to tackle drugs, and thereby helping to sustain the estimated 2.5 million heroin addicts in Russia.
'No authorisation'
Viktor Ivanov said that along with 932kg (2,055lb) of high-grade heroin and 156kg (345lb) of opium, a large amount of technical equipment was destroyed. But in a strongly worded statement on Saturday, President Karzai's office alleged that Russian military personnel had taken part in the "illegal" raid.
"While Afghanistan remains committed to its joint efforts with the international community against narcotics, it also makes it clear that no organisation or institution shall have the right to carry out such a military operation without prior authorisation and consent of the government of Afghanistan," it said. "Such unilateral operations are a clear violation of Afghan sovereignty as well as international law, and any repetition will be met by the required reaction from our side," the statement added. Mr Karzai said Afghanistan wanted friendly ties with Moscow, but that the relationship had to be based on mutual consent.
A senior source in the delegation of Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, who is currently on a visit to Vietnam, told the AFP news agency on Sunday that Kabul's reaction to the anti-drug operation was "simply surprising and incomprehensible" because "the Afghan interior ministry participated in this operation".
The BBC's Quentin Sommerville in Kabul says Afghanistan's elite counter narcotics force did participate in the operation but it appears that the president's office was not informed of who would accompany them. Afghanistan's interior ministry said it thought that only Russian observers rather than Russian troops were to take part, our correspondent adds. The president's national security adviser, Rangin Dadfar Spanta, said Nato officials had apologised in private but that he wanted a public declaration.
On Friday, the head of Russia's drug control agency said its agents had taken part in an operation on Thursday to destroy a "major hub" of drug production about 5km (three miles) from the Pakistani border, near the city of Jalalabad.
|
ProdigalSon is offline
|
|
10-31-2010, 07:31
|
#3
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NC for now
Posts: 2,418
|
Of course he is upset. Those are his laboratories. It would be funny if I was joking.
__________________
Sounds like a s#*t sandwhich, but I'll fight anyone, I'm in.
|
kgoerz is offline
|
|
10-31-2010, 16:07
|
#4
|
Guerrilla
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 153
|
From the RIA Novosti article:
Quote:
' Ivanov said approximately 65% of Afghanistan's opium crops are grown in the Helmand Province, one of the most volatile regions in the country, adding that farmers make "around $70 a year by cultivating opium, much more than for growing wheat." '
|
I knew the farmers made very little, of course, but it is amazing to see how little.
Quote:
"An estimated 90 percent of heroin consumed in Russia is trafficked from Afghanistan via Tajikistan and Uzbekistan."
|
I understand why Russia wants to be involved, but it seems like a very sharp two edged sword for ISAF/NATO/DEA efforts. An example of the strategic shift of the war, and the US efforts to mend relations with Russia.
__________________
"I will find a way, or make one."
Last edited by aegisnavy; 10-31-2010 at 16:11.
|
aegisnavy is offline
|
|
10-31-2010, 16:14
|
#5
|
Quiet Professional (RIP)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Carriere,Ms.
Posts: 6,922
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kgoerz
Of course he is upset. Those are his laboratories. It would be funny if I was joking.
|
Dead right,that's exactly why he wasn't informed!................
Big Teddy
__________________
I believe that SF is a 'calling' - not too different from the calling missionaries I know received. I knew instantly that it was for me, and that I would do all I could to achieve it. Most others I know in SF experienced something similar. If, as you say, you HAVE searched and read, and you do not KNOW if this is the path for you --- it is not....
Zonie Diver
SF is a calling and it requires commitment and dedication that the uninitiated will never understand......
Jack Moroney
SFA M-2527, Chapter XXXVII
|
greenberetTFS is offline
|
|
10-31-2010, 19:15
|
#6
|
Guerrilla
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Ft. Drum
Posts: 180
|
Why not grow more wheat to feed the people instead of growing opium to feed junkies? I know thats how alot of the farmers make their living but damn...think I already know the answer to that question anyway.
__________________
The general who advances without coveting fame and retreats without fearing disgrace, whose only thought is to protect his country and do good service for his sovereign, is the jewel of the kingdom - Sun Tzu
Last edited by DevilSide; 10-31-2010 at 19:19.
|
DevilSide is offline
|
|
10-31-2010, 19:35
|
#7
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland
Posts: 24,806
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevilSide
Why not grow more wheat to feed the people instead of growing opium to feed junkies? I know thats how alot of the farmers make their living but damn...think I already know the answer to that question anyway.
|
Tell you what, do a quick calculation of crop yield per acre times market price for wheat vs. opium and tell me why people there do not do as you suggest.
TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910
De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
|
The Reaper is offline
|
|
11-01-2010, 10:54
|
#8
|
Area Commander
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA-Germany
Posts: 1,574
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brush Okie
Im not an expert here but isn't working with Russia in Afganistan a bit counterproductive to our goal of winning the trust of the Afgan people? I have no problems with the raid per say but come on folks we helped kick the Russians out of there in 1989 is our memory that short or does the pentagon and other people in the puzzle palace just that damn stupid?
|
A reasonable question, while there is likely latent sensitivity to Russian involvement, is it possible before we can win the hearts and minds of the Afghan people we need to curtail the power of the Taliban, and the poppy fields are their capital base?
If it is true 90% of the heroin consumed in Russian comes from this area their security and police forces are likely well informed and motivated allies against a common enemy. I wonder what percent of the financing and guerilla personnel for the Chechens and other breakaway republics Moscow is conflict with come from Afghanistan?
The world has also obviously changed since 1980, the Soviet Union is gone, along with the current threat for opportunistic Soviet expansion. In contrast Russia is struggling to retain population and congruency instead of sharing the fate of the Soviet Union. If republics in the Russian Federation continue to break away, or oil prices drop Russia is in deep kim chee.
__________________
"Men Wanted: for Hazardous Journey. Small wages, bitter cold, long months of complete darkness, constant danger, safe return doubtful. Honour and recognition in case of success.” -Sir Ernest Shackleton
“A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in.” –Greek proverb
|
akv is offline
|
|
11-01-2010, 12:56
|
#9
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orange, Ca.
Posts: 4,950
|
Maybe they can be persuaded to not grow opium. There are soil sterilants available for those that don't feel like cooperating.
If I had my way, I would load up every C130 in the inventory with Roundup then fly 'em in formation wing tip to wing tip down the Andes over any area the Coca plant is grown. Then, when they start complaining, I would tell them if we see one more coca plant growing, the next pass will have a 3 year soil sterilant. Screw the potato crop, too bad if you get hungry, do what we tell you or we will return....
|
mark46th is offline
|
|
11-01-2010, 13:22
|
#10
|
Guerrilla
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 153
|
A quick Google search of TR's direction found that in 2008 wheat prices were increasing enough, due to drought and other factors, to cause some of the farmers to stop cultivating poppies and start growing wheat.
So, at least the economic factor for the farmer on the ground is within reason for the difference between dope and wheaties. On the other hand, when you make 50 bucks a year a 40% pay increase to 70 bucks is a huge motivator. In addition, there are obviously other motivating factors such as a tango's AK in your back.
Brings new meaning to the cliche "It's a rough row to hoe."
__________________
"I will find a way, or make one."
Last edited by aegisnavy; 11-01-2010 at 17:14.
|
aegisnavy is offline
|
|
11-01-2010, 15:45
|
#11
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland
Posts: 24,806
|
IMHO, wheat production is only really viable for large tracts and with mechanization.
It can be viable (barely) on smaller farms with extremely low labor costs, especially when there are penalties for growing poppies. A certain percentage of these farms will fail in any given year.
What does the farmer and his employees do when he fails?
TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910
De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
|
The Reaper is offline
|
|
11-01-2010, 16:37
|
#12
|
Guerrilla
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern California by way of Houston, TX
Posts: 164
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Reaper
Tell you what, do a quick calculation of crop yield per acre times market price for wheat vs. opium and tell me why people there do not do as you suggest.
TR
|
Sir,
May we compare? The going rate for a pound of weed here in my town this season is roughly $2000 (outdoor) and $2300 -2400(indoor). Since the DA Merith Lintott (up for reelection) agreed not to prosecute cases involving 99 punds or less you can have that much-
99 lbs at $2K/lb=$198,000
99lbs at $2.4K=$237.6K
Many folks have suggested that pot growers switch to grapes. The math does not work for them.
If you grow indoors you can reasonably get up to 3 crops per year.
Here is something more realistic-
23 plants (indoor) this is the city ordinance limit
yield 1 lb per plan (conservative)
23 lbs at $55,200 x 3 crops = $165,600
The grower has chemical and soil expenses and he has to pay trimmers to trim the pot. Costs are probably about $10,000 per year.
What is not factored here, is the B Grade stuff, Buds too small to use or left over timmings and the stms and such that are used to make concentrate (Hash) that stuff can go for $500-$1000 per pound.
Of course where there is pot, there is cash, weapons and meth. We have problems with addiction, crime and violence.
Same problem, different part of the world. We need help.
Such is the People's Republik of kalifornia.
__________________
zuluzerosix
Last edited by zuluzerosix; 11-01-2010 at 18:30.
|
zuluzerosix is offline
|
|
11-01-2010, 18:21
|
#13
|
Guerrilla Chief
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ft Benning
Posts: 707
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zuluzerosix
99 lbs at $2K/lb=$198,000
99lbs at $2.4K=$237.6K
Many folks have suggested that pot growers switch to grapes. The math does not work for them.
|
Man...sorry...Dude, that looks pretty good!
I would suggest that the "farmers" who are reluctant to switch to growing grapes watch a few episodes of the "old" HBO series "Oz". Scared Straight works!
__________________
"I see that you notice that I wear glasses. Well, it was to be. I've not only grown old and gray, I've become almost blind in the service of my country." - General George Washington
"There are times in your life you'll be required to perform an exceedingly difficult task to the best of your ability, regardless of your perceived capability. Mental toughness is what will carry the day during these times. In other words, you suck it up and do what you have to do." - Razor
|
lindy is offline
|
|
11-01-2010, 18:28
|
#14
|
Guerrilla
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern California by way of Houston, TX
Posts: 164
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lindy
Man...sorry...Dude, that looks pretty good!
I would suggest that the "farmers" who are reluctant to switch to growing grapes watch a few episodes of the "old" HBO series "Oz". Scared Straight works!
|
You don't quite understand the drug trade here. In my post, I stated that the DA will not prosecute cases involving less than 99 pounds. The growers are not afraid of the cops. Yes, there are seizures for the production of marijuanna
for sale, but you don't think these folks get hard time do you?
The wife of our public defender was caught for transporting a helluva lot of pot processed for retail sale. All she got was probation.
Many of the growers have better weapons, night vision and commo than the local LEO's. They pay police insiders for intelligence (and they pay well). They hire former soldiers to keep watch on their grow sites and for protection (and they pay well).
__________________
zuluzerosix
|
zuluzerosix is offline
|
|
11-01-2010, 22:10
|
#15
|
Guerrilla
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Ft. Drum
Posts: 180
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Reaper
Tell you what, do a quick calculation of crop yield per acre times market price for wheat vs. opium and tell me why people there do not do as you suggest.
TR
|
I cant find anything on market price, but here is what I did find out.
Last year Afghanistan suffered a drought, and the wheat production fell about 55%. But this season was expected to rise in productions by 127% at 3.4 billion tons. But the crop yield for cannabis was 145Kg per hectare and the farmers get paid $40-95 million USD, and thats only 15% of whats paid for opium *$438 million
I'm not sure if the above is true, but to me it looks like the drug producers are doing better than the wheat farmers. Never doubted that at all, just think if they are making all this money on something that does the world harm, should'nt they atleast buy more food if they cant grow it as well as opium and cannabis?
Sources:
http://www.pecad.fas.usda.gov/highli...6/Afghanistan/
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/LD20Df02.html
__________________
The general who advances without coveting fame and retreats without fearing disgrace, whose only thought is to protect his country and do good service for his sovereign, is the jewel of the kingdom - Sun Tzu
|
DevilSide is offline
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 23:26.
|
|
|