Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > At Ease > General Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-07-2010, 09:34   #1
LibraryLady
Guerrilla
 
LibraryLady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pacific North Wet
Posts: 402
Losing your First Amendment rights and NOT to the govt

Franken does an excellent job of laying it out. I've read about this in other places but his op-ed is the clearest, most succinct piece I've read.

LL

Quote:
Net neutrality is foremost free speech issue of our time
By Al Franken, Special to CNN
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
Al Franken: Trend of media consolidation will mean end of free and open internet
Mergers such as Comcast-NBC/Universal would control information flow, senator warns
Far from "neutral," gatekeepers could discriminate on political views, who pays more, he says
Franken: This is a bipartisan issue; all have a stake in preserving First Amendment
Editor's note: Sen. Al Franken was elected to the Senate as a member of the DFL (Democratic-Farmer-Labor) Party from Minnesota. He was sworn in July 2009 after a statewide hand recount. Before he joined the Senate, he spent 37 years as a comedy writer, author and radio talk show host.

(CNN) -- If we learned that the government was planning to limit our First Amendment rights, we'd be outraged. After all, our right to be heard is fundamental to our democracy.

Well, our free speech rights are under assault -- not from the government but from corporations seeking to control the flow of information in America.

If that scares you as much as it scares me, then you need to care about net neutrality.

"Net neutrality" sounds arcane, but it's fundamental to free speech. The internet today is an open marketplace. If you have a product, you can sell it. If you have an opinion, you can blog about it. If you have an idea, you can share it with the world.

And no matter who you are -- a corporation selling a new widget, a senator making a political argument or just a Minnesotan sharing a funny cat video -- you have equal access to that marketplace.

An e-mail from your mom comes in just as fast as a bill notification from your bank. You're reading this op-ed online; it'll load just as fast as a blog post criticizing it. That's what we mean by net neutrality.

But telecommunications companies want to be able to set up a special high-speed lane just for the corporations that can pay for it. You won't know why the internet retail behemoth loads faster than the mom-and-pop shop, but after a while you may get frustrated and do all of your shopping at the faster site. Maybe the gatekeepers will discriminate based on who pays them more. Maybe they will discriminate based on whose political point of view conforms to their bottom line.

We don't have to speculate. We can look to the history of the media gatekeepers for examples.

Back in the 1990s, Congress rescinded rules that prevented television networks from owning their own programming. Network executives swore in congressional hearings that they wouldn't give their own programming preferred access to the airwaves. They vowed access to the airwaves would be determined only by the quality of the shows.

I was working at NBC back then, and I didn't buy that line one bit. Sure enough, within a couple of years, NBC was the largest supplier of its own prime-time programming. To take advantage of this new paradigm, Disney bought ABC, Viacom (the parent company of Paramount) bought CBS and NBC merged with Universal.

And since these conglomerates owned both the pipes through which Americans received information (in this case, TV networks) and the information itself (in this case, TV shows), they developed a monopoly over what you could watch.

Today, if you're an independent producer, it's nearly impossible to get a show on the air unless the network owns at least a piece of it.

Now Comcast, the nation's largest cable provider, and NBC/Universal want to merge. This new behemoth would be able to charge other cable carriers more for NBC, MSNBC, CNBC, Bravo and the 35 other cable networks it will own in whole or in part. This means that other carriers won't be able to afford as many choices -- and it means that your cable bill will go up.

Comcast is also the nation's largest home internet service provider. And as more and more of our television is provided through the internet, other internet giants such as Verizon and AT&T will have to look toward merging with CBS/Viacom or ABC/Disney.

We'll end up with a few megacorporations in control of the flow of information -- not just on TV, but now online as well.

From my seat on the Judiciary Committee, I plan to do everything I can to stop these mergers or at least put rigorous restrictions on them. But if this trend toward media consolidation continues, the free and open internet will be a thing of the past unless we write the principle of net neutrality into law right now.

This isn't a liberal or conservative issue. Everyone has a stake in protecting the First Amendment.

And it isn't even strictly a political issue. The internet's freedom and openness has made it a hotbed for innovations that change our lives. It's been an incredible engine of job creation.

The internet was developed at taxpayer expense to benefit the public interest. If we let corporations prioritize some content over others, we'll lose what makes it so valuable to our economy, our democracy and our daily lives.

Net neutrality may sound like a technical issue, but it's the key to preserving the internet as we know it -- and it's the most important First Amendment issue of our time.

The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Sen. Al Franken.
http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/08/0...ity/index.html
__________________
Only librarians like to search, everyone else likes to find. Roy Tenant
LibraryLady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2010, 10:49   #2
Green Light
Quiet Professional
 
Green Light's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Eastern Panhandle, WV
Posts: 719
Net neutrality is a trojan horse. It would allow the government to decide net content using the same old saw of "fairness." If people have more of one opinion than another, then government will "balance" the discussion.

Currently, this is what the government is trying to do to radio:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has announced a new “Chief Diversity Officer,” communications attorney Mark Lloyd.

(Here's what he wants to do):

* Restore local and national caps on the ownership of commercial radio stations.
* Ensure greater local accountability over radio licensing.
* Require commercial owners who fail to abide by enforceable public interest obligations to pay a fee to support public broadcasting.
.
This will cause radio stations to play opinion shows that no one will listen to. This will bring down revenues and cause radio stations to close. This is what the net neutrality will do to the internet. It is a solution looking for a problem. I believe that sites like this one (we're veterans - we're dangerous according to DHS Secretary Napolitano) and we will be silenced.

It is a back door assault on the freedom of individuals.
__________________
"If we lose freedom here, there's no place to escape to. This is the last stand on earth."
RWR

"If it neither breaks my leg nor picks my pocket, what difference does it make to me?"
TJ
Green Light is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2010, 13:21   #3
The Reaper
Quiet Professional
 
The Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland
Posts: 24,822
Franken stole the election, or his people did.

He is in office after the counting of thousands of felons' votes along with other shady practices.

Net neutrality is doublespeak for government censorship and propaganda. Herr Goebbels would be proud. What the people listen to stays on the air. What they do not, loses its' advertisers and its' slots.

Wasn't Franken one of the stars of Air America, before it folded due to lack of interest?

TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910

De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
The Reaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2010, 13:34   #4
Green Light
Quiet Professional
 
Green Light's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Eastern Panhandle, WV
Posts: 719
100% correct. It was well documented. His opponent either got tired of trying to fight it or ran out of money. BTW, does buffoon have one "F" or two?
__________________
"If we lose freedom here, there's no place to escape to. This is the last stand on earth."
RWR

"If it neither breaks my leg nor picks my pocket, what difference does it make to me?"
TJ
Green Light is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2010, 16:49   #5
Sigaba
Area Commander
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 4,482
Al Franken has returned to his roots as a comedy writer.
Sigaba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2010, 17:50   #6
tonyz
Area Commander
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 4,792
Thus far, the Internet has become an excellent source for information, communication, entertainment and commerce - and - the federal government has remained largely on the sidelines. IMHO, the last thing the Internet needs now is some sort of government intervention. Franken’s piece is reminiscent of at least two of Aesop's Fables -- The Boy Who Cried Wolf and The Wolf in Sheep's Clothing.
tonyz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2010, 18:06   #7
ZonieDiver
Quiet Professional
 
ZonieDiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Georgetown, SC
Posts: 4,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sigaba View Post
Al Franken has returned to his roots as a comedy writer.

I've missed 'Columbo'!

McConnel put Franken in his 'place' the other day!
__________________
"I took a different route from most and came into Special Forces..." - Col. Nick Rowe
ZonieDiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 07:57   #8
wet dog
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Reaper View Post
Net neutrality is doublespeak for government censorship and propaganda. Herr Goebbels would be proud. TR
I've read the thread, but came back to TR's post to begin my line of thinking.

When asked by another, for what purposes I have in searching the internet for news sources, my answer was that of comparison.

There are already too many controls in my life that limits my soul to feel free. When you start controling what I say, followed by what I should think, then we have other problems.

For the most part, I consider the Govt. is looking out for my best interests. I represent the general public, I'm a consumer of goods and services, I buy products that add to the bottom line of the manufactures, I enjoy this society.

When controlling tactics are deployed to knock out serves in a foreign country used by enemies of America, then I'm in favor of doing that, just do not knock out PS.com, or my ability rant from to time to time.

Corporations do not have my best interests in mind, they have only theirs and will use whatever means necessary in influence me with trendy shopping gimics.

I'm in however, the market for a new "tin foiled hat", size 7, taking suggestions.

When I can't get a hold of friends here, consider me in movement to pre-determined Rally Points.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 09:34   #9
tonyz
Area Commander
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 4,792
Internet communication more important than ever

Not sure where to post this report - but it may be of some interest given the original topic of this thread - the article above discussing the "kill switch" and the recent events unfolding in Egypt.

Suffice to say the discussion seems timely.

Freedom on the Net: A Global Assessment of Internet and Digital Media

March 30, 2009

As internet and mobile phone use explodes worldwide, governments are adopting new and multiple means for controlling these technologies that go far beyond technical filtering. Freedom on the Net provides a comprehensive look at these emerging tactics, raising concern over trends such as the "outsourcing of censorship" to private companies, the use of surveillance and the manipulation of online conversations by undercover agents.

Discussion on Egypt begins on page 51 of this report.

http://www.freedomhouse.org/uploads/...FullReport.pdf

Excerpt from report:

"As the internet and other new media come to
dominate the flow of news and information
around the world, governments have responded
with measures to control, regulate, and censor
the content of blogs, websites, and text
messages. Indeed, the recent case of an Iranian
blogger who died in police custody is a
disturbing reminder that expressions of political
dissent or even independent thought circulated
through the internet carry as much risk as those
circulated via underground journals in an earlier
era. And just as authoritarian regimes once
devoted massive resources to controlling the
print media and the airwaves, so today China
employs a small army of functionaries tasked
with monitoring and censoring the content of
websites and blogs."


President Obama's take on the matter in a 2009 BBC article below:

to paraphrase:

"freedoms of expression, and worship, of access to information and political participation – we believe they are universal rights. They should be available to all people, including ethnic and religious minorities, whether they are in the United States, China or any nation."

Obama presses China over rights

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8361471.stm

Excerpt:

"Freedom of expression

In his speech at the Shanghai Science and Technology Museum, the US president praised China's efforts in lifting millions of people out of poverty, saying it was "unparalleled" in human history.

But the BBC's Michael Bristow in Beijing says Mr Obama also made comments that his hosts would have been less pleased to hear.

"We do not seek to impose any system of government on any other nation, but we also don't believe that the principles we stand for are unique to our nation," he said.

"These freedoms of expression and worship, of access to information and political participation - we believe are universal rights."

China is an authoritarian country in which there are no elections for the country's national leaders.

Media outlets and the internet are heavily censored, and those who speak out against the government are often imprisoned.

Mr Obama added: "They should be available to all people, including ethnic and religious minorities, whether they are in the United States, China or any nation."

After his main speech, he addressed the issue again in a question and answer session with Chinese students - many of whom spoke English.

Mr Obama said freedom of information - including open access to the internet - was important.

"That makes our democracy stronger because it forces me to hear opinions that I don't want to hear - it forces me to examine what I'm doing," he said.
He said the internet was a powerful tool to mobilise people and had helped him win the presidency last year. "
tonyz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 13:15.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies