Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > At Ease > General Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-07-2010, 20:46   #1
JJ_BPK
Quiet Professional
 
JJ_BPK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: 18 yrs upstate NY, 30 yrs South Florida, 20 yrs Conch Republic, now chasing G-Kids in NOVA & UK
Posts: 11,901
LSAT is back,,

They are still talking a 5.56,, but with good weight savings.
I would rather they look at a .270 to .280 cal version, 120-130 gr..

Quote:
Lightweight Small Arms Technologies May 2010
Contact :Mrs. KP
US Army ARDEC
KP_lips@us.army.mil

http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2010armamen...riPhillips.pdf

Program Goals:
  • Fill critical operational needs
  • Revolutionize weapons and ammunition
  • Mature technologies for transition
  • Maintain affordability of current systems
  • Alleviate logistics burdens

Approach:
  • “Clean Slate” design
  • Trade studies -reduced weight is priority
  • Extensive modeling & simulation
  • Incorporate User feedback
__________________
Go raibh tú leathuair ar Neamh sula mbeadh a fhios ag an diabhal go bhfuil tú marbh

"May you be a half hour in heaven before the devil knows you’re dead"
JJ_BPK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2010, 06:55   #2
nmap
Area Commander
 
nmap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 2,760
Any thoughts about the reliability of the caseless ammo?
__________________
Carpe diem quam minimum credula postero

Acronym Key:

MOO: My Opinion Only
YMMV: Your Mileage May Vary
ETF: Exchange Traded Fund


Oil Chart

30 year Treasury Bond
nmap is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:57.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies