Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > At Ease > The Early Bird

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-22-2010, 00:26   #1
incarcerated
Area Commander
 
incarcerated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,557
US lifts sanctions against Russians linked to Iran

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...052103437.html

US lifts sanctions against Russians linked to Iran

By ROBERT BURNSThe Associated Press
Friday, May 21, 2010; 6:14 PM
WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration on Friday removed sanctions against three Russian organizations the U.S. had previously accused of assisting Iran's effort to develop nuclear weapons.
Penalties against a fourth Russian entity previously accused of illicit arms sales to Syria also were lifted.
The timing of the decisions, published in Friday's Federal Register but not otherwise announced by the State Department, suggested the possibility of a link to U.S. efforts to win Russian support for a proposed new U.N. Security Council resolution expanding sanctions against Iran over its nuclear program.
State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley denied that the decision to lift the sanctions was meant to win Russian support for additional Iran sanctions. He said, however, that it reflected the fact that "Russia has over time adapted its approach to Iran" and has shown restraint in certain arms deals with Tehran.
"So we felt that as Russia shared our concern about Iran and was willing to support the kinds of arms restrictions that are in the draft (U.N.) resolution, we felt confident that we could remove these penalties while protecting our non-proliferation interests," Crowley said.
While the U.S. did not lift the sanctions in exchange for Moscow's support in the U.N., the two actions "are connected in the sense that clearly the actions Russia has taken over time have demonstrated that they take the situation with Iran seriously," he added.
When Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton visited Moscow in March, Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin publicly complained to her about a range of U.S. government sanctions against Russian companies. In private, Putin and other Russian officials raised with Clinton the specific issue of removing U.S. sanctions on Russian entities accused of supporting Iran's nuclear and missile programs.
Two of the Russian entities - Dmitri Mendeleyev University of Chemical Technology and the Moscow Aviation Institute - had been sanctioned in January 1999 under a 1994 executive order authorizing such action. The order was aimed at organizations determined to have contributed to a foreign country's development or production of weapons of mass destruction or missiles capable of launching such weapons.
When the administration of former President Bill Clinton announced those sanctions, then-Energy Secretary Bill Richardson said the two institutions "directly support Iranian efforts to develop nuclear weapons."
At the time, the Russian government denied such support for Iran.
U.S. sanctions imposed in October 2008 against Russian state arms trader Rosoboronexport for alleged illicit assistance to Iran's nuclear program also were lifted by the State Department on Friday.
Rosoboronexport said at the time that it had sold only defensive weaponry to Iran.
Earlier this year, Anatoly Isaikin, head of Rosoboronexport, said Russia still considers Iran a valuable arms customer. That was a reassuring message to Tehran despite recent indications of Moscow's support for tougher Western sanctions.
Isaikin told a news conference in late January that no international agreements bar Russia from selling weapons to Tehran.
Russia signed a 2007 contract to sell the powerful S-300 air defense missiles to Tehran but so far has not delivered any. No reason has been given for the delay, but Israel and the United States strongly objected to Iran obtaining the long-range missiles, which would significantly boost the country's air defense capability.
The State Department on Friday also lifted sanctions against Tula Instrument Design Bureau in April 1999 for providing anti-tank guided missiles to Syria.
__________________
“This kind of war, however necessary, is dirty business, first to last.” —T.R. Fehrenbach

“We can trust our doctors to be professional, to minister equally to their patients without regard to their political or religious beliefs. But we can no longer trust our professors to do the same." --David Horowitz
incarcerated is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2010, 02:44   #2
sf11b_p
Guerrilla
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 428
Yes and the new agreement or resolution would allow Iran the S-300 surface to air missiles.

Quote:
Ever since Moscow and Tehran cut a deal for the sale of S-300 surface-to-air system, Israel and the United States have worried about the deployment of the hi-tech weapon in Iran, where it could be used to guard its nuclear program from air strikes. Russia has so far held off from shipping the weapon to Iran, but concerns are mounting that the latest Security Council sanctions resolution under negotiation leaves open the possibility of Iran getting hold of the missile system that was originally to be delivered in March 2009.

A key element in the resolution introduced into the Security Council on Tuesday by U.S Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice calls upon countries to block sales and transfer of tanks, combat aircraft, warships and "missiles or missile systems as defined for the purpose of the United Nations Register of Conventional arms."

Fox News checked the U.N Register and discovered that the section pertaining to missiles “does not include ground-to-air missiles.” This means that Iran would be allowed to complete its purchase of Russia’s S-300. The truck-mounted S-300 ground-to-air system has a 90-mile range and can shoot down U.S. made cruise missiles and fighter jets.

According to former U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. John Bolton, “once this system is deployed and operational in Iran it will effectively preclude an Israeli military option against Iran’s nuclear weapons program, and that’s something that could affect the United States, too. If we at some point were threatened and we needed to attack Iranian air bases, those systems would be there to defend against us.”

The Russian Mission to the U.N. confirmed the resolution does not prohibit the sale of the S-300. A Western U.N. diplomat says that loopholes such as this one in the draft resolution was likely required to prevent a Russian or Chinese veto when the text comes up for a Security Council vote. - http://liveshots.blogs.foxnews.com/2...est=latestnews
sf11b_p is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 16:21.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies