Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > At Ease > The Soapbox

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-09-2009, 09:49   #1
Warrior-Mentor
Quiet Professional
 
Warrior-Mentor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: America, the Beautiful
Posts: 3,193
Exclamation Obama's risky-sex czar

Wednesday, December 9, 2009
EDITORIAL:
Obama's risky-sex czar
THE WASHINGTON TIMES

WARNING: This editorial includes discussion of topics that are sexually graphic. Under usual circumstances, we would never entertain these subjects or the rancid language involved. In this case, however, a very unusual exception must be made because the issues are central to the background of a senior presidential appointee at the U.S. Department of Education who is in a position to influence how and what our children are taught in our nation's schools. Thus far, out of fear or squeamishness, there has been public hesitance to examine closely the beliefs of this individual because many are afraid even to touch the risky content. Our scruples cannot be used against us when traditional moral precepts need to be defended. Simply, the deep level of depravity involved in this subject cannot be portrayed without providing a couple of examples to illustrate the inappropriate content. Please do not read any further if you will be offended by sexually graphic language.

The Obama administration is stonewalling serious inquiries about sexual filth propagated by a senior presidential appointee who is responsible for promoting and implementing federal education policy.

Democrats clearly are terrified of ruffling the feathers of their activist homosexual supporters, who are an influential part of the Democratic party's base. This scandal, however, is not merely about homosexual behavior; it is about promoting sex between children and adults - and it's time for President Obama to make clear that abetting such illegal perversion has no place in his administration.

It is curious why White House officials and Education Secretary Arne Duncan believe it's worth it politically to continue taking arrows for defending Kevin Jennings, who is Mr. Obama's controversial "safe schools czar."

The evidence suggesting he is unfit to serve as a senior presidential appointee is startling and plentiful. It was revealed this week that Mr. Jennings was involved in promoting a reading list for children 13 years old or older that made the most explicit sex between children and adults seem normal and acceptable. This brought up anew Mr. Jennings' past controversies, such as his seeming encouragement of sex between one of his high school students and a much older man as well as his praise for Harry Hay, a notorious supporter of the North American Man Boy Love Association.

But there is more. There are shocking new revelations this week of tape recordings from a youth conference involving 14-year-old students. The conference, billed as a forum to encourage tolerance of homosexuality, was sponsored by Mr. Jennings' organization and was held at Tufts University in March 2000. Mr. Jennings was executive director of the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) from its founding in 1995 until August 2008. The conference sessions appear to have had less to do with promoting tolerance and more to do with teaching children how to engage in sex.

Andrew Breitbart's Biggovernment.com provides tapes of some of the sessions. Describing the subject matter as smut would be putting it lightly. The conference discussions were very graphic and cannot be relayed in full detail in a family newspaper. A few examples are sufficient to describe the depravity of the subject matter. During one session about oral sex, a presenter asked the 14-year-old students: "Spit or swallow? Is it rude?" In another session, the 14-year-olds are taught about a gross practice called "fisting," in which "the man leading the discussion position[ed] his hand and show[ed] 14-year-olds how to insert their entire hand into the rectum of their sex partner."

Teaching children sexual techniques is simply not appropriate. Unfortunately, it is part of a consistent pattern by some homosexual activists to promote underage homosexuality while pretending that their mission is simply to promote tolerance for so-called alternative lifestyles.

It is outrageous that someone involved in this scandal is being paid by the taxpayers to serve in a high-powered position at the Education Department, of all places. At some point, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Jennings, Obama administration spokesmen and the president himself are going to have to start answering questions about all this. Refusing to do so won't make the issue go away.

SOURCE:
http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009...isky-sex-czar/
Warrior-Mentor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2009, 16:28   #2
Paslode
Area Commander
 
Paslode's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Occupied Wokeville
Posts: 4,658
The FISTING Czar...A new low on the 'O' Scale.

I was leery of posting this last night, Thanks for posting!

The 'Fisting' Czar........Another fine, fine example of the Obama Adminstration vetting and decision making skills. I wonder if 'O' would approve of Jennings tutoring his daughters????

And remember during the 2008 Presidential campaign Barack Obama told audiences, 'Judge me by the people with whom I surround myself'.


Audio of one of the lessons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jD2x...layer_embedded





It more insane by the day.
__________________
Quote:
When a man dies, if nothing is written, he is soon forgotten.

Last edited by Paslode; 12-09-2009 at 16:34.
Paslode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2009, 16:45   #3
Warrior-Mentor
Quiet Professional
 
Warrior-Mentor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: America, the Beautiful
Posts: 3,193
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paslode View Post
I was leery of posting this last night, Thanks for posting!

The 'Fisting' Czar........Another fine, fine example of the Obama Adminstration vetting and decision making skills. I wonder if 'O' would approve of Jennings tutoring his daughters????

And remember during the 2008 Presidential campaign Barack Obama told audiences, 'Judge me by the people with whom I surround myself'.


Audio of one of the lessons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jD2x...layer_embedded

It more insane by the day.

He that walks with wise men shall be wise:
but a companion of fools shall be destroyed.
- Proverbs 13:20
Warrior-Mentor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2009, 17:37   #4
Box
Quiet Professional
 
Box's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: State of Confusion
Posts: 5,910
Quote:
And remember during the 2008 Presidential campaign Barack Obama told audiences, 'Judge me by the people with whom I surround myself'.
He WAS judged according to the people he surrounded himself with...
...and it netted him over 350 electoral votes.
__________________
Opinions stated in this post are solely those of the author, and in no way reflect the opinions or policies of The Department of Defense, The United States Army, The Royal Canadian Mounted Police, The Screen Actors Guild, The Boy Scouts, The Good, The Bad, or The Ugly. These opinions are provided purely as overly sarcastic social commentary and are not meant to be used for mission planning or navigation.

"Make sure your own mask is secure before assisting others"
-Airplane Safety Briefing
Box is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2009, 17:55   #5
Paslode
Area Commander
 
Paslode's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Occupied Wokeville
Posts: 4,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy L-bach View Post
He WAS judged according to the people he surrounded himself with...
...and it netted him over 350 electoral votes.

Tidbits were out there, but the MSM turned a blind eye and the sheep bought the American Idol routine.....I think he got judged not by whom he surrounded himself but rather the Rock Star image.
__________________
Quote:
When a man dies, if nothing is written, he is soon forgotten.
Paslode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2009, 20:18   #6
Warrior-Mentor
Quiet Professional
 
Warrior-Mentor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: America, the Beautiful
Posts: 3,193
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paslode View Post
Tidbits were out there, but the MSM turned a blind eye and the sheep bought the American Idol routine.....I think he got judged not by whom he surrounded himself but rather the Rock Star image.
Had we judged him by who he walked with, we'd be in much better shape right now...

- Jeremiah Wright,
- Father Michael Pfleger,
- William Ayers and
- Antoin Rezko

Just a start...now look at all the Muslim Brotherhood associates he's put in his administration...

How did he get into Harvard?

And who is Khalid al-Mansour?
Warrior-Mentor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2009, 21:21   #7
Paslode
Area Commander
 
Paslode's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Occupied Wokeville
Posts: 4,658
I find the variety of radicals he associates himself with interesting. The common bond appears to be they all despise the United States, but beyond that it would seem that many would have conflicting interests. And because of the conflicts I don't see them all getting a piece of the pie.

Not many people even Obama would want their kids tutored by a freak like Jennings. So why are all these divisive people hanging around? Are they each just another stick to throw in the spokes of US that will be discarded when no longer useful?
__________________
Quote:
When a man dies, if nothing is written, he is soon forgotten.
Paslode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2009, 21:40   #8
BigJimCalhoun
Guerrilla
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 401
We home-school our son for a number of reasons, the first post is one of them.
BigJimCalhoun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2009, 23:28   #9
incarcerated
Area Commander
 
incarcerated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,557
I am SHOCKED that Woody Allen was passed over for this position.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Warrior-Mentor View Post
Kevin Jennings
Mentioned earlier here:
http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/...ennings&page=3
__________________
“This kind of war, however necessary, is dirty business, first to last.” —T.R. Fehrenbach

“We can trust our doctors to be professional, to minister equally to their patients without regard to their political or religious beliefs. But we can no longer trust our professors to do the same." --David Horowitz
incarcerated is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2009, 01:20   #10
armymom1228
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
This all just goes back to another thread on parents being involved with thier children's education and school. At every age level.

AM
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2009, 07:25   #11
Dozer523
BANNED USER
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,751
WM,
You keep up with all these blindingly colorful posts and we might start to wonder. . .
Dozer523 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2009, 07:33   #12
Warrior-Mentor
Quiet Professional
 
Warrior-Mentor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: America, the Beautiful
Posts: 3,193
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dozer523 View Post
WM,
You keep up with all these blindingly colorful posts and we might start to wonder. . .
It is the CHRISTMAS SEASON.

Besides, I wouldn't want someone to accuse me of not being a person of COLOR!
Warrior-Mentor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2009, 07:36   #13
Dozer523
BANNED USER
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,751
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warrior-Mentor View Post
It is the CHRISTMAS SEASON.

Besides, I wouldn't want someone to accuse me of not being a person of COLOR!
That's great!!. Take the rest of the day off!
Dozer523 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 14:06   #14
Dusty
RIP Quiet Professional
 
Dusty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Ozarks
Posts: 10,072
Obama Vetting?

Hannity to show this tape tonight:

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Governm...its-obama-tape
__________________
"There you go, again." Ronald Reagan
Dusty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 14:23   #15
Pete
Quiet Professional
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fayetteville
Posts: 13,080
Hannity

Hannity is talking about it - without revealing much detail right now - other than it was known to some in the MSM but withheld because they wanted their guy to win.
Pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 19:15.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies