11-17-2009, 01:22
|
#1
|
Guerrilla Chief
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ft Campbell
Posts: 555
|
Can this be true?
Federal Judge Carter sets Trial Date for Obama's Eligibility!
The expedited trial has been set for Jan. 26, 2010!
Many concerned veterans and citizens attended the hearing in Federal Court in Santa Ana in the lawsuit against Barack Obama to determine his eligibility to be President and Commander in Chief. About 150 people showed up, almost all in support of the lawsuit to demand that Obama release his birth certificate and other records that he has hidden from the American people.
Judge David Carter refused to hear Obama's request for dismissal. He indicated there was almost no chance that this case would be dismissed. Obama is arguing this lawsuit was filed in the wrong court if you can believe that. Obama would prefer a "kangaroo court" instead of a Federal court! Assuming Judge Carter denies Obama's motion for dismissal, he will likely then order expedited discovery which will force Obama to release his birth certificate in a timely manner (if he has one).
The judge, WHO IS A FORMER U.S. MARINE, repeated several times that this is A VERY SERIOUS CASE which must be resolved quickly so that the troops know that their Commander in Chief is eligible to hold that position and issue lawful orders to our military in this time of war. He basically said OBAMA MUST PROVE HIS ELIGIBILITY to the court! He said Americans deserve to know the truth about their President!
The two U.S. Attorneys representing Barack Obama tried everything they could to sway the judge that this case was frivolous, but Carter would have none of it and cut them off several times. Obama's attorneys left the courtroom after about the 90 minute hearing looking defeated and nervous.
Great day in America for the U.S. Constitution! The truth about Barack Obama's eligibility will be known fairly soon - Judge Carter practically guaranteed it!
Video from the press conference after the hearing coming soon. Congratulations to plaintiffs attorney Dr. Orly Taitz! She did a great job and won some huge victories. She was fearless!
__________________
" Being a sheepdog has never been about getting better bones."
Destrier
|
chance is offline
|
|
11-17-2009, 01:38
|
#2
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 15,370
|
Not true.
The referenced case has already been dismissed by Judge Carter, who concluded his 29 October 2009 order granting the defendants' Motion to Dismiss with the following statement:
Plaintiffs have encouraged the Court to ignore mandates of the Constitution; to disregard the limits on its power put in place by the Constitution; and to effectively overthrow a sitting president who was popularly elected by "We the People" — over sixty-nine million of the people. Plaintiffs have attacked the judiciary, including every prior court that has dismissed their claim, as unpatriotic and even treasonous for refusing to grant their requests and for adhering to the terms of the Constitution which set forth its jurisdiction. Respecting the constitutional role and jurisdiction of this Court is not unpatriotic. Quite the contrary, this Court considers commitment to that constitutional role to be the ultimate reflection of patriotism.
And so it goes...
Richard's $.02
__________________
“Sometimes the Bible in the hand of one man is worse than a whisky bottle in the hand of (another)… There are just some kind of men who – who’re so busy worrying about the next world they’ve never learned to live in this one, and you can look down the street and see the results.” - To Kill A Mockingbird (Atticus Finch)
“Almost any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.” - Robert Heinlein
|
Richard is offline
|
|
11-17-2009, 01:52
|
#3
|
Guerrilla Chief
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ft Campbell
Posts: 555
|
Richard,
You really know how to kill a guys buzz.
__________________
" Being a sheepdog has never been about getting better bones."
Destrier
|
chance is offline
|
|
11-17-2009, 15:20
|
#4
|
Quiet Professional (RIP)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Carriere,Ms.
Posts: 6,922
|
__________________
I believe that SF is a 'calling' - not too different from the calling missionaries I know received. I knew instantly that it was for me, and that I would do all I could to achieve it. Most others I know in SF experienced something similar. If, as you say, you HAVE searched and read, and you do not KNOW if this is the path for you --- it is not....
Zonie Diver
SF is a calling and it requires commitment and dedication that the uninitiated will never understand......
Jack Moroney
SFA M-2527, Chapter XXXVII
|
greenberetTFS is offline
|
|
11-17-2009, 15:50
|
#5
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 15,370
|
Quote:
...he's a disgrace to the the Marine Corps...
|
For upholding the law?
Richard
__________________
“Sometimes the Bible in the hand of one man is worse than a whisky bottle in the hand of (another)… There are just some kind of men who – who’re so busy worrying about the next world they’ve never learned to live in this one, and you can look down the street and see the results.” - To Kill A Mockingbird (Atticus Finch)
“Almost any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.” - Robert Heinlein
|
Richard is offline
|
|
11-17-2009, 16:00
|
#6
|
Quiet Professional (RIP)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Carriere,Ms.
Posts: 6,922
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard
For upholding the law?
Richard
|
Is that what you call it? I read your post and I couldn't agree with the judges response........
Big Teddy
__________________
I believe that SF is a 'calling' - not too different from the calling missionaries I know received. I knew instantly that it was for me, and that I would do all I could to achieve it. Most others I know in SF experienced something similar. If, as you say, you HAVE searched and read, and you do not KNOW if this is the path for you --- it is not....
Zonie Diver
SF is a calling and it requires commitment and dedication that the uninitiated will never understand......
Jack Moroney
SFA M-2527, Chapter XXXVII
|
greenberetTFS is offline
|
|
11-17-2009, 16:09
|
#7
|
BANNED USER
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,751
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chance
Richard,
You really know how to kill a guys buzz. 
|
Yeah what a spoil sport. :boo Richard, boo boo.
All he had to do was Google 'Judge Carter" and "Obama" and get about 10 quick links (any of which revealed about 2,010,500 -- who counts? -- links) The third one was along the lines of your "STOP THE PRESSES" discovery dated September 9, -- only two months ago! A tiny bit more searching found the news of October 29, 2009. And with that catty comment from the bench too.
It's only news if its new. . . and accurate.
Let it go, Teddy.
|
Dozer523 is offline
|
|
11-17-2009, 16:34
|
#8
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 15,370
|
Quote:
Is that what you call it?
|
You should go here and read the entire ruling by the Judge.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/21808122/J...-Ruling-on-MTD
And..."Yep!"
Richard's $.02
__________________
“Sometimes the Bible in the hand of one man is worse than a whisky bottle in the hand of (another)… There are just some kind of men who – who’re so busy worrying about the next world they’ve never learned to live in this one, and you can look down the street and see the results.” - To Kill A Mockingbird (Atticus Finch)
“Almost any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.” - Robert Heinlein
|
Richard is offline
|
|
11-18-2009, 06:39
|
#9
|
FTFSI
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: State of mind
Posts: 79
|
"The Law?"
If it's the law, it's called "legal plunder". SO many "laws" created to protect the "innocent". Very, very sad state of affairs IMO.
__________________
"Faith sees the invisible, Believes the incredible, and Receives the impossible."
|
Knight is offline
|
|
11-18-2009, 08:39
|
#10
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 407
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knight
If it's the law, it's called "legal plunder". SO many "laws" created to protect the "innocent". Very, very sad state of affairs IMO. 
|
And yet, we don't want judges attempting to legislate from the bench. No one likes when the other side tries it, so why should we do it?
SCOTUS is the closest thing to an exception, but there are plenty of laws that are constitutional, yet still bad. Bad laws should be fixed by the legislature. So the right way to set things straight is to try to elect people who will fix or eliminate bad laws.
__________________
..-. .. -. .- .-.. .-.. -.-- | .- -. | . -.-. .... --- | .-.-.
|
Slantwire is offline
|
|
03-17-2010, 12:11
|
#11
|
Guerrilla
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Murrieta, Ca
Posts: 316
|
and so it goes?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_obama_birth_certificate
(note to QPs do not read the yahoo user comments, unless you want to be annoyed)
__________________
“Try not to become a man of success but rather try to become a man of value.”
–Albert Einstein
|
spherojon is offline
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:37.
|
|
|