Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > At Ease > General Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-04-2004, 17:35   #1
BMT (RIP)
Quiet Professional
 
BMT (RIP)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Red State
Posts: 3,774
Tenets Replacement

Tenet is just about history. Who do you think will get his job?

BMT
Jr. FOG
__________________
Don't mess with old farts...age and treachery will always overcome youth and skill! Bullshit and brilliance only come with age and experience.
BMT (RIP) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2004, 17:39   #2
Roguish Lawyer
Consigliere
 
Roguish Lawyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland (at last)
Posts: 8,767
The question is who will, not who should, right?

I'd say Giuliani.
Roguish Lawyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2004, 19:58   #3
Airbornelawyer
Moderator
 
Airbornelawyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,938
Quote:
Originally posted by Roguish Lawyer
The question is who will, not who should, right?

I'd say Giuliani.
The Administration does not appear to have the stomach for a contentious confirmation battle before the election. Senate Democrats will also try to use the hearings to revisit the message they tried with the 9/11 Commission (which seems to be "damned if you do, damned if you don't" regarding everything from profiling to preemption). I expect a non-controversial low-key professional intelligence type promoted from within. Someone like John McLaughlin (the one that doesn't yell at Mort Kondracke and Freddie "the Beetle" Barnes). I also expect that "damned if you do, damned if you don't" will apply and no matter how "non-controversial", SenDems will try to turn it ugly. The alternative is to appoint an interim director and wait until after the election to send someone for confirmation.
Airbornelawyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2004, 20:01   #4
Roguish Lawyer
Consigliere
 
Roguish Lawyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland (at last)
Posts: 8,767
Quote:
Originally posted by Airbornelawyer
The Administration does not appear to have the stomach for a contentious confirmation battle before the election.
This is why I think Giuliani has to be the favorite if he'll take the job. He still is riding the wave of his 9-11 glory. He'd be tough to oppose.
Roguish Lawyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2004, 05:07   #5
Radar Rider
Guerrilla Chief
 
Radar Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fayetteville
Posts: 796
I should get the job. I'd do it correctly, without worrying about politics.
Radar Rider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2004, 13:34   #6
DanUCSB
Guerrilla
 
DanUCSB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ryndon, NV
Posts: 339
Forgive me if I'm a bit uninformed on the subject, but what qualifications would Giuliani bring with him, other than public esteem for his 9/11 activities? IIRC, isn't his background as crusader-type public prosecutor (Eliot Spitzer-type) before he took elected office? Is there some intelligence-type work in there that I'm missing? Or are you mentioning him solely because of current public opinion/popularity?

(Unrelated: ha! 100 posts)
__________________
"I have seen much war in my lifetime and I hate it profoundly. But there are things worse than war; and all of them come with defeat." -- Hemingway
DanUCSB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2004, 16:08   #7
rubberneck
Area Commander
 
rubberneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Buckingham, Pa.
Posts: 1,746
Quote:
Forgive me if I'm a bit uninformed on the subject, but what qualifications would Giuliani bring with him, other than public esteem for his 9/11 activities? IIRC, isn't his background as crusader-type public prosecutor (Eliot Spitzer-type) before he took elected office?
The comparrison of Rudy to that attention whore Spitzer are grossly unfair. Spitzer has made his public name going after corporate fraud while Rudy on the other hand made his chops by kicking the legs out from under organized crime. Rudy had to deal with the very real threat of some wise guy putting a bullet behind his ear but it never seemed to slow him down.

I don't think the next DCI has to have ties to the Intelligence community, after all, the first President Bush was a former DCI with no intelligence background. Rudy has proven that he is able to turn around a bloody mess that was the NYC government after four years of David Dinkins.

The man has the brains and the star power to stand up to some of the more outspoken members of Congress. His demanding but fair management style will do wonders in Langley. Some of the career civil severants will hate his guts because he will force them to perform when no one else has but in the end ,much like NYC, the CIA will be much better off after his tenure than before.
rubberneck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2004, 21:02   #8
Jimbo
Guerrilla
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: East Coast
Posts: 438
The people who should be at the bottom of the list for DCI are anyone with a background in Law Enforcement or the District Attorney's office.
Jimbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2004, 09:14   #9
NousDefionsDoc
Quiet Professional
 
NousDefionsDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 1,653
Porter Gross - after the election
__________________
Somewhere a True Believer is training to kill you. He is training with minimal food or water, in austere conditions, training day and night. The only thing clean on him is his weapon and he made his web gear. He doesn't worry about what workout to do - his ruck weighs what it weighs, his runs end when the enemy stops chasing him. This True Believer is not concerned about 'how hard it is;' he knows either he wins or dies. He doesn't go home at 17:00, he is home.
He knows only The Cause.

Still want to quit?
NousDefionsDoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2004, 09:20   #10
NousDefionsDoc
Quiet Professional
 
NousDefionsDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 1,653
Quote:
Originally posted by Jimbo
The people who should be at the bottom of the list for DCI are anyone with a background in Law Enforcement or the District Attorney's office.
Cop hater!
__________________
Somewhere a True Believer is training to kill you. He is training with minimal food or water, in austere conditions, training day and night. The only thing clean on him is his weapon and he made his web gear. He doesn't worry about what workout to do - his ruck weighs what it weighs, his runs end when the enemy stops chasing him. This True Believer is not concerned about 'how hard it is;' he knows either he wins or dies. He doesn't go home at 17:00, he is home.
He knows only The Cause.

Still want to quit?
NousDefionsDoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2004, 11:20   #11
Jimbo
Guerrilla
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: East Coast
Posts: 438
Quote:
Originally posted by NousDefionsDoc
Cop hater!
Not true. I just spent the morning learning some neat tricks from the DC ERT team.

But Law Enforcement and lawyers have the wrong mindset for running intel collection and analysis.
Jimbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2004, 11:23   #12
Jimbo
Guerrilla
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: East Coast
Posts: 438
Quote:
Originally posted by NousDefionsDoc
Porter Gross - after the election
Fuck yeah. A fellow Bearcat.
Jimbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2004, 17:28   #13
Airbornelawyer
Moderator
 
Airbornelawyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,938
Goss

A fellow Floridian (albeit not a native).

Goss might be a good choice, but he has little chance. George H.W. Bush is the only former Congressman to serve as DCI, and he only served two terms and had other jobs in between. As chairman of the Permanent Select Committee, Goss has been in a position to make a lot of enemies in the IC. He is also a conservative - his lifetime ACU and ADA ratings are 87 and 9, respectively. Abortion may have nothing to do with intelligence collection and analysis, but it is another reason for Democrats to try to use a confirmation battle as a way of rallying the base for the election.

McLaughlin will serve as interim director until after the election. The only significant change of course might be to form a blue ribbon panel on reforming the intelligence community. Building on the 9/11 Commission report (due in July I think) and other reports and reviews, this would present whomever is inaugurated next January with an opportunity to not just appoint a new director, but find a new direction.

In the long run, who is DCI might not matter as much if he is no longer dual-hatted as chairman of the IC and director of one of the agencies within that community.
Airbornelawyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2004, 17:50   #14
NousDefionsDoc
Quiet Professional
 
NousDefionsDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 1,653
You think he's too old or too political?
__________________
Somewhere a True Believer is training to kill you. He is training with minimal food or water, in austere conditions, training day and night. The only thing clean on him is his weapon and he made his web gear. He doesn't worry about what workout to do - his ruck weighs what it weighs, his runs end when the enemy stops chasing him. This True Believer is not concerned about 'how hard it is;' he knows either he wins or dies. He doesn't go home at 17:00, he is home.
He knows only The Cause.

Still want to quit?
NousDefionsDoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2004, 17:55   #15
NousDefionsDoc
Quiet Professional
 
NousDefionsDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 1,653
Quote:
Originally posted by Jimbo
But Law Enforcement and lawyers have the wrong mindset for running intel collection and analysis.
Mmmm

"was a member of the New York City "Establishment," a powerful Wall Street lawyer and a Columbia Law classmate (1907) of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, although they were not close at the time."


"After the war, he was the US Attorney for the Western District of New York, famous for his energetic enforcement of Prohibition, and he ran unsuccessfully for public office. President Calvin Coolidge named him to the Justice Department's Antitrust Division."
__________________
Somewhere a True Believer is training to kill you. He is training with minimal food or water, in austere conditions, training day and night. The only thing clean on him is his weapon and he made his web gear. He doesn't worry about what workout to do - his ruck weighs what it weighs, his runs end when the enemy stops chasing him. This True Believer is not concerned about 'how hard it is;' he knows either he wins or dies. He doesn't go home at 17:00, he is home.
He knows only The Cause.

Still want to quit?
NousDefionsDoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:08.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies