Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > At Ease > General Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-22-2008, 14:00   #1
Counsel
Guerrilla
 
Counsel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 187
Interesting Piece

Middle East Imperative
by: James Cash, Brigadier General, USAF, Retired

I wrote recently about the war in Iraq and the larger war against radical Islam, eliciting a number of responses. Let me try and put this conflict in proper perspective.

Understand; the current battle we are engaged in is much bigger than just Iraq. What happens in the next year will affect this country and how our kids and grand kids live throughout their lifetime, and beyond. Radical Islam has been attacking the West since the seventh century. They have been defeated in the past and decimated to the point of taking hundreds of years to recover. But they can never be totally defeated. Their birth rates are so far beyond civilized world rates, that in time they recover and attempt to dominate again.

There are eight terror-sponsoring countries that make up the grand threat to the West. Two, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan just need firm pressure from the West to make major reforms. They need to decide who they are really going to support and commit to that support.

That answer is simple. They both will support who they think will hang in there until the end, and win.

We are not sending very good signals in that direction right now, thanks to the Democrats.

The other six, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Syria, North Korea and Libya will require regime change or a major policy shift. Now, let's look more closely.
Afghanistan and Iraq have both had regime changes, but are being fueled by outsiders from Syria and Iran. We have scared Gaddafi's pants off, and he has given up his quest for nuclear weapons, so I don't think Libya is now a threat.

North Korea (the non-Islamic threat) can be handled diplomatically by buying them off. They are starving. That leaves Syria and Iran. Syria is like a frightened puppy. Without the support of Iran they will join the stronger side. So where does that leave us? Sooner, or later, we are going to be forced to confront Iran, and it better be before they gain nuclear capability.

In 1989 I served as a Command Director inside the Cheyenne Mountain complex located in Colorado Springs, Colorado for almost three years. My job there was to observe (through classified means) every missile shot anywhere in the world and assess if it was a threat to the US or Canada. If any shot was threatening to either nation I had only minutes to advise the President, as he had only minutes to respond.

I watched Iran and Iraq shoot missiles at each other every day, and all day long, for months. They killed hundreds of thousands of their people. Know why? They were fighting for control of the Middle East and that enormous oil supply.

At that time, they were preoccupied with their internal problems and could care less about toppling the west. Oil prices were fairly stable and we could not see an immediate threat.

Well, the worst part of what we have done as a nation in Iraq is to do away with the military capability of one of those nations. Now, Iran has a clear field to dominate the Middle East, since Iraq is no longer a threat to them.

They have turned their attention to the only other threat to their dominance, they are convinced they will win, because the US is so divided, and the Democrats (who now control Congress and may control the Presidency in 2008) have openly said we are pulling out.

Do you have any idea what will happen if the entire Middle East turns their support to Iran, which they will obviously do if we pull out? It is not the price of oil we will have to worry about. Oil WILL NOT BE AVAILABLE to this country at any price. I personally would vote for any presidential candidate who did what JFK did with the space program---declare a goal to bring this country to total energy independence in a decade.

Yes, it is about oil. The economy in this country will totally die if that Middle East supply is cut off right now. It will not be a recession. It will be a depression that will make 1929 look like the "good-old-days". The bottom line here is simple. If Iran is forced to fall in line, the fighting in Iraq will end over night, and the nightmare will be over.

One way or another, Iran must be forced to join modern times and the global community. It may mean a real war---if so, now is the time, before we face a nuclear Iran with the capacity to destroy Israel and begin a new ice age.

I urge you to read the book "END GAME" by two of our best Middle East experts, true American patriots and retired military generals, Paul Vallely and Tom McInerney. They are our finest, and totally honest in their assessment of why victory in the Middle East is so important, and how it can be won. Proceeds for the book go directly to memorial fund for our fallen soldiers who served the country during the war on terror. You can find that book by going to the Internet through Stand-up America at http://www.ospreyradio.us/! , http://www.ospreyradio.us/ or http://www.rightalk.com/, < SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: 13.5pt; COLOR: #6600cc">http://www.rightalk.com/.

On the other hand, we have several very angry retired generals today, who evidently have not achieved their lofty goals, and insist on ranting and raving about the war. They are wrong, and doing the country great harm by giving a certain political party reason to use them as experts to back their anti-war claims.

You may be one of those who believe nothing could ever be terrible enough to support our going to war. If that is the case I should stop here, as that level of thinking approaches mental disability in this day and age. It is right up there with alien abductions and high altitude seeding through government aircraft contrails. I helped produced those contrails for almost 30 years, and I can assure you we were not seeding the atmosphere. The human race is a war-like population, and if a country is not willing to protect itself, it deserves the consequences.

'Enough - said!'

Now, my last comments will get to the nerve. They will be on politics.

I am not a Republican. And, George Bush has made enough mistakes as President to insure my feelings about that for the rest of my life. However, the Democratic Party has moved so far left, they have made me support those farther to the right.

I am a conservative who totally supports the Constitution of this country. The only difference between the United States and the South American, third world, dictator infested and ever-changing South American governments, is our US Constitution.

This Republic (note I did not say Democracy) is the longest standing the world has ever known, but it is vulnerable. It would take so little to change it through economic upheaval. There was a time when politicians could disagree, but still work together. We are past that time, and that is the initial step toward the downfall of our form of government.

I think that many view Bush-hating as payback time. The Republicans hated the Clinton 's and now the Democrats hate Bush.

So, both parties are putting their hate toward willingness to do anything for political dominance to include lying and always taking the opposite stand just for the sake of being opposed. JUST HOW GOOD IS THAT FOR OUR COUNTRY?

In my lifetime, after serving in uniform for President's Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan , and Bush I have a pretty good feel for which party supported our military, and what military life was like under each of their terms. And, let me assure you that times were best under the Republicans.

Service under Jimmy Carter was devastating for all branches of the military. And, Ronald Regan was truly a salvation.

You can choose to listen to enriched newscasters, and foolish people like John Murtha (he is no war hero), Nancy Pelosi, John Kerry, Michael Moore, Jane Fonda, Harry Reid, Russ Feingold, Hillary Clinton, Ted Kennedy, and on-and-on to include the true fools in Hollywood if you like. If you do, your conclusions will be totally wrong.

The reason that I write, appear on radio talk shows, and do everything I can to denounce those people is simple. THEY ARE PUTTING THEIR THIRST FOR POLITICAL POWER AND QUEST FOR VICTORY IN 2008 ABOVE WHAT IS BEST FOR THIS COUNTRY. I cannot abide that.

Pelosi clearly defied the Logan Act by going to Syria, which should have lead to imprisonment of three years and a heavy fine.

Jane Fonda did more to prolong the Vietnam War than any other human being (as acknowledged by Ho Chi Minh in his writing before he died). She truly should have been indicted for treason, along with her radical husband, Tom Hayden, and forced to pay the consequences.

This country has started to soften by not enforcing its laws, which is another indication of a Republic about to fall.

All Democrats, along with the Hollywood elite, are sending us headlong into a total defeat in the Middle East, which will finally give Iran total dominance in the region. A lack of oil in the near future will be the final straw that dooms this Republic.

However, if we refuse to let this happen and really get serious about an energy self-sufficiency program, this can be avoided. I am afraid, however, that we are going in the opposite direction.
__________________
"Sure, we want to go home. We want this war over with. The quickest way to get it over with is to go get the bastards who started it. The quicker they are whipped, the quicker we can go home. The shortest way home is through Berlin and Tokyo. And when we get to Berlin, I am personally going to shoot that paper hanging son-of-a-bitch Hitler. Just like I'd shoot a snake!"

Gen. George S. Patton, Jr.
Counsel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2008, 14:01   #2
Counsel
Guerrilla
 
Counsel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 187
Part II

If we elect Hillary Clinton and a Democrat controlled congress, and they carry through with allowing Iran to take control of the Middle East, continue to refuse development of nuclear energy, refuse to allow drilling for new oil, and continue to do nothing but oppose everything Bush, it will be over in terms of what we view as the good life in the USA.

Now, do I think that all who do not support the war are un-American--- of course not. They just do not understand the importance of total victory in that region.

Another failure of George Bush is his inability to explain to the American people why we are there, and why we MUST win.

By the way, it is not a war. The war was won four years ago. It is martial law that is under attack by Iranian and Syrian outside influences, and there is a difference.

So, what do I believe? What is the bottom line? I will simply say that the Democratic Party has fielded the foulest, power hungry, anti-country, self absorbed group of individuals that I have observed in my lifetime. Our educational system is partially to blame for allowing the mass of America to be taken in by this group. George Bush has done the best he can with the disabilities that he possesses.

A President must communicate with the people. And, I would tell you that Desert Storm spoiled the people. Bush Senior's 100-hour war convinced the people that technology has progressed to the point that wars could be fought with no casualties and won in very short periods of time.

I remember feeling at the time, that this was a tragedy for the US military. To win wars, you must put boots on the ground. When you put boots on the ground, soldiers are going to die. A President must make the war decision wisely, and insure that the cause is right before using his last political option.

HOWEVER, CONTROLLING IRAN AND DEMOCRATIZING THE MIDDLE EAST IS THE ONLY CHOICE IF WE ARE HELL BENT ON DEPENDING ON THEM FOR OUR FUTURE ENERGY NEEDS.

Jimmy L. Cash, Brigadier General, USAF, Retired
Lakeside, Montana 59922

"I'll tell you what war is all about; you've got to kill people, and when you've killed enough they stop fighting."
-- General Curtis LeMay
__________________
"Sure, we want to go home. We want this war over with. The quickest way to get it over with is to go get the bastards who started it. The quicker they are whipped, the quicker we can go home. The shortest way home is through Berlin and Tokyo. And when we get to Berlin, I am personally going to shoot that paper hanging son-of-a-bitch Hitler. Just like I'd shoot a snake!"

Gen. George S. Patton, Jr.
Counsel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2008, 15:11   #3
Dad
Guerrilla
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 365
Vallely and McInerny

How are these two viewed by those who served with them? Also, it was just yesterday that Gates criticized the Air Force for not being engaged enough in Iraq and Afghanistan. I always thought the purpose of the Air Force is to support the Army.
Dad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2008, 15:31   #4
The Reaper
Quiet Professional
 
The Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland
Posts: 24,816
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dad View Post
I always thought the purpose of the Air Force is to support the Army.
The Air Force decided many years ago that the reverse is true.

If we can secure their bases, they can win any war with shock and awe from 30,000' and be back at the club in time for Happy Hour.

I don't think Al Qaeda and the Taliban got the memo.

TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910

De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
The Reaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2008, 18:53   #5
x-factor
Guerrilla
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 462
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dad View Post
How are these two viewed by those who served with them? Also, it was just yesterday that Gates criticized the Air Force for not being engaged enough in Iraq and Afghanistan. I always thought the purpose of the Air Force is to support the Army.
The age of nuclear weapons and prospect of intercontinental war means that isn't always the case. The USAF takes a lot of flak (bad pun, I know) for its relationship (supporting vs independent vs whatever) with ground forces. In my opinion, some of that is warranted and some of it isn't.

There are alot of big scenarios (Taiwan Straits most obviously, but there are others too) where the USAF has a potentially huge role and the Army a very minimal one. The country and the leadership expect them to be prepared for those. The USAF doesn't have the option of saying "no, our job is to support the Army."

That said, there are times when the USAF does quite blatantly try to fit a square "air power" peg into a round hole just to try and prove they can. Thats just ego, sometimes to the point of being borderline unethical.
__________________
The strength of a nation is its knowledge. -Welsh Proverb

X
x-factor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2008, 19:39   #6
Paste Eater
SF Candidate
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 37
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dad View Post
How are these two viewed by those who served with them? Also, it was just yesterday that Gates criticized the Air Force for not being engaged enough in Iraq and Afghanistan. I always thought the purpose of the Air Force is to support the Army.


An interesting read on thwe subject, "Danger Close" by Steven Call

It's mainly about TACPS in Afghanistan and Iraq, but it also goes into detail the turfwars so to say that the Air Force and Army struggled through prior to these conflicts. It gives a good insight as to how certain members of each respective branch have tried to merge the powers of these two branches to bring about "jointness" if you will, in combat and other capabilities.

Basically, quit pissing and moaning about who has the power and authority to do what and put your heads together and figure it the hell out.
__________________


The last song you'll hear as you head up the creek without a paddle.


Currently Reading: "Danger Close" -Steven Call
Paste Eater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2008, 19:45   #7
nmap
Area Commander
 
nmap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 2,760
Quote:
Originally Posted by Counsel View Post
Yes, it is about oil. The economy in this country will totally die if that Middle East supply is cut off right now. It will not be a recession. It will be a depression that will make 1929 look like the "good-old-days". The bottom line here is simple. If Iran is forced to fall in line, the fighting in Iraq will end over night, and the nightmare will be over.
Good point.

There are those who contend the wars are about oil as if that were somehow odious and wrong. But the truth is, we've built our civilization around cheap and abundant crude oil. Perhaps we can transform ourselves, given time, to be less dependent - but the change would be neither quick nor cheap. Oil is, quite literally, our life blood. A cutoff of oil would be analogous to strangling a person.

But the problem is - do we have the national will to fight Iran? I suspect such a war would be hard to win and costly in terms of lives - but I am ignorant of such things. I hope one of the many who know more about the subject will comment.
__________________
Carpe diem quam minimum credula postero

Acronym Key:

MOO: My Opinion Only
YMMV: Your Mileage May Vary
ETF: Exchange Traded Fund


Oil Chart

30 year Treasury Bond
nmap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2008, 22:09   #8
Razor
Quiet Professional
 
Razor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 4,531
If the war was primarily about oil, wouldn't it have been easier and more beneficial to invade Venezuela?
Razor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2008, 22:33   #9
nmap
Area Commander
 
nmap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 2,760
Quote:
Originally Posted by Razor View Post
If the war was primarily about oil, wouldn't it have been easier and more beneficial to invade Venezuela?
Sir, my understanding is that Venezuela's oil is of poor quality - both heavy and sour. So the refineries have a much more challenging (hence expensive) job than with light sweet crude.

And then there's the neighborhood. Saudi Arabia produces about 10 million barrels per day, whereas Venezuela had 2.2 million barrels. In 2006, Iraq produced 2 million barrels per day. (The reports are available at EIA Link

So, supposing that one wanted to stabilize the entire area, Iraq might make an ideal spot to control.

But, as I've said, I don't claim to know anything about military operations. I would be most interested in any thoughts you might care to mention.
__________________
Carpe diem quam minimum credula postero

Acronym Key:

MOO: My Opinion Only
YMMV: Your Mileage May Vary
ETF: Exchange Traded Fund


Oil Chart

30 year Treasury Bond
nmap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2008, 07:23   #10
Guy
Quiet Professional
 
Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: OCONUS...again
Posts: 4,702
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by nmap View Post
Sir, my understanding is that Venezuela's oil is of poor quality - both heavy and sour. So the refineries have a much more challenging (hence expensive) job than with light sweet crude.
Look into the number of oil refineries we had in the past and compare them to the #s we have today....

Stay safe.
__________________
“It is better to have sheep led by a lion than lions led by a sheep.”

-DE OPPRESSO LIBER-
Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2008, 07:26   #11
SF_BHT
Quiet Professional
 
SF_BHT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sneaking back and forth across the Border
Posts: 6,681
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guy View Post
Look into the number of oil refineries we had in the past and compare them to the #s we have today....

Stay safe.
Oh Now you want us to do Math? 1+1-2+3-9= oh shit we do not have enough.
SF_BHT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2008, 08:33   #12
Counsel
Guerrilla
 
Counsel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Puerto Rico, USA
Posts: 187
Oil?

Do you guys believe that our dependence of Middle Eastern oil alone was just cause for OIF?
__________________
"Sure, we want to go home. We want this war over with. The quickest way to get it over with is to go get the bastards who started it. The quicker they are whipped, the quicker we can go home. The shortest way home is through Berlin and Tokyo. And when we get to Berlin, I am personally going to shoot that paper hanging son-of-a-bitch Hitler. Just like I'd shoot a snake!"

Gen. George S. Patton, Jr.
Counsel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2008, 08:47   #13
Guy
Quiet Professional
 
Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: OCONUS...again
Posts: 4,702
Quote:
Originally Posted by Counsel View Post
Do you guys believe that our dependence of Middle Eastern oil alone was just cause for OIF?
Way above my.......

Stay safe.
__________________
“It is better to have sheep led by a lion than lions led by a sheep.”

-DE OPPRESSO LIBER-
Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2008, 09:03   #14
SF_BHT
Quiet Professional
 
SF_BHT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sneaking back and forth across the Border
Posts: 6,681
Quote:
Originally Posted by Counsel View Post
Do you guys believe that our dependence of Middle Eastern oil alone was just cause for OIF?
In my humble Opinion No!

But no one in DC cares what I think, much less those in my house.
SF_BHT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2008, 09:43   #15
Guy
Quiet Professional
 
Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: OCONUS...again
Posts: 4,702
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by SF_BHT View Post
In my humble Opinion No!

But no one in DC cares what I think, much less those in my house.
Ain't that the truth!

Stay safe.
__________________
“It is better to have sheep led by a lion than lions led by a sheep.”

-DE OPPRESSO LIBER-
Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:29.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies