He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton

BMT (RIP) · 10-08-2007, 06:49

http://www.examiner.com/a-977346~He_...y_Clinton.html

BMT

Snaquebite · 10-08-2007, 07:17

Quote:

even though his security clearance has been suspended until September 2008.

WTF??? Not only is he not doing time...He's getting a clearance back?

8944 · 10-08-2007, 07:44

Is it true that all future meetings involving Sandy Berger & Hilary will be "standing only" because Sandy can't sit with all the documents shoved down his pants??????

jatx · 10-08-2007, 07:59

This is great, the GOP couldn't have scripted it better!

x-factor · 10-08-2007, 08:25

I don't understand why politicians do stuff like this. How thin is the Democrat bench at the national security expert position that you have to go back to this guy?

82ndtrooper · 10-08-2007, 08:52

Just when I thought the Democrats couldn't be anymore stupid. Then there's this clown back on the circuit.

Monsoon65 · 10-08-2007, 10:32

Any one of us would still be serving time after being reduced to E-1 and losing all pay and allowances.

This jerk is not only did NO TIME, he'll get his clearance back after the three years. And he's once again sucking at the government tit.

And he'll get access to more documents to destroy to protect Billary.

Gypsy · 10-08-2007, 11:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by Monsoon65

And he'll get access to more documents to destroy to protect Billary.

Very first thing I thought of...not only what he did in the past, but what he'd do in the future. This is beyond f'd up.

10-08-2007, 13:05

checking . . . OK still have both testicles. Do the federales have work release? Maybe on the stump she will talk about rehabbing a criminal.

echoes · 10-08-2007, 13:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by 8944

Is it true that all future meetings involving Sandy Berger & Hilary will be "standing only" because Sandy can't sit with all the documents shoved down his pants??????

I guess ole Hill wants him around for that purpose...so she can check down there herself!

Holly

echoes · 10-08-2007, 15:09

This is from a month ago...but still...

Is DVD Release of 'Path to 9/11' Being Buried to Protect the Clintons?
Wednesday, September 05, 2007

By John Gibson

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hey, where's the DVD version of "The Path to 9/11"? It's not out.

Remember that controversial ABC movie which had scenes in it that depicted Clinton national security adviser Sandy Berger refusing to give a go order when U.S. soldiers had bin Laden in their gunsights? Remember how the Democrats came unglued that such scenes would appear before the American public?
Madeleine Albright condemned it. Berger himself denied any such incident took place. And other high-level Democrats browbeat ABC into editing the objectionable scenes out.

Well guess what? The L.A. Times reported today that one of the film's producer-writers is certain that: "Powerful forces are out to protect Bill Clinton's presidential legacy and shield Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton from any potential collateral damage in her bid for the White House," by burying the DVD of "The Path to 9/11."

The Times quotes one of the film's producers saying that he was told by an ABC honcho: "If Hillary weren't running for president, this wouldn't be a problem." The DVD would be out.

Believe it or not, even Oliver Stone is lamenting the fact that censorship for political purposes seems to be afoot in Hollywood. Ollie, dude, where ya been? Hollywood is blue, left and far left.

It was bad enough the scenes were even shot that showed the Clintons dithered while bin Laden was within their grasp. The left was furious over the charge.

Bill Clinton told Chris Wallace, at least I tried to kill bin Laden. But don't forget that the head of the bin Laden group at the CIA, Michael Scheuer, says no he didn't.

For both Bill and Hillary, the uncomfortable question is: Is there still a cover-up in play over moments in the Clinton administration when if someone with some guts had been in charge bin Laden would have been dead years before 9/11?

Hollywood and some powerful friends don't want you watching that film again. It might make some people think, hmmm, I wonder if we had gotten bin Laden before Bush took office, how would that have changed history?

Hmm, something to mull over.

That's My Word

dmgedgoods · 10-08-2007, 18:11

#

**The Reaper** · 10-08-2007, 18:21

Is consorting with a should be felon not a violation of some rule for Presidential candidates?

TR

kgoerz · 10-08-2007, 19:20

This woman has hit every Campaign water mark that Elected Presidents have hit. Fox listed about 15 of them the other day. No one is even close to that. She is leading in the polls. I am absolutely floored at what she gets away with. People keep saying someone will bring up some dirt on her, just wait. The Campaign fiasco three weeks ago didn't touch her. "These people were acting on their own" "They are not part of my Team" POOF, GONE
This berger thing shouldn't surprise anyone. He is a life long friend of theirs. He will be on her Staff when elected. Who wouldn't want someone willing to go to Jail or break the Law for them on their Staff. She will rule with absolute power.
Unless they have video of her torturing Puppies I don't think any scandal could bring her down. This is going to be bad. The fake laughing she did two Sundays ago wasn't even an issue to anyone. To me it was lying to my face. But everyone just thought it was cute. She was blatantly deceiving us.

cb88 · 10-12-2007, 21:10

So, if Hillary Clinton gets elected and appoints Sandy Berger in charge of National Security, will she be appointing Marc Rich to the head of the IRS?