 |
President Bush's Speech... |
 |
04-13-2004, 19:29
|
#1
|
|
Asset
ChaoticVirtuoso is offline
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: East Coast
Posts: 42
|
President Bush's Speech...
Discuss...
|
|
|
|
|
04-13-2004, 19:50
|
#2
|
|
Consigliere
Roguish Lawyer is offline
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-13-2004, 20:22
|
#3
|
|
Quiet Professional
The Reaper is offline
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland
Posts: 20,451
|
I wish that they would give me permission to thump reporters asking ignorant or disrespectful questions.
The POTUS has just had his integrity questioned about six different times by these smarmy bastards.
TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910
De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2017
|
|
|
|
|
04-13-2004, 20:52
|
#4
|
|
Moderator
Airbornelawyer is offline
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,666
|
Some of his answers came across as evasive, but they were mainly the ones in response to the ones clearly designed only to get a "gotcha!" soundbite ("name your greatest mistake" and "apologize to the American people"), so fuck 'em (the "reporters", not the American people).
|
|
|
|
|
04-13-2004, 20:59
|
#5
|
|
Moderator
Airbornelawyer is offline
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,666
|
I may have a greater grasp of nitpicky details, but he handled the questions with greater aplomb and grace than I would have. After that "the coalition is only piddling" question, I probably would have noted that a hundred and fifty Albanians may be nobodies to him, but that's 150 more Albanians putting their lives on the line for freedom than smarmy White House reporters and Democratic presidential candidates.
|
|
|
|
|
04-13-2004, 21:00
|
#6
|
|
Guerrilla
DunbarFC is offline
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 372
|
I didn't see Helen Thomas there.
Have they managed to ban the troglodyte for good ?
__________________
“Its never too late to be what you might have been”.
|
|
|
|
|
04-13-2004, 21:11
|
#7
|
|
Guest
|
With respect to the media - 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-13-2004, 21:29
|
#8
|
|
Quiet Professional
The Reaper is offline
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland
Posts: 20,451
|
Quote:
Originally posted by DunbarFC
I didn't see Helen Thomas there.
Have they managed to ban the troglodyte for good ?
|
Pardon my bluntness, but there was a bitch slapping, and the troll was killed.
She was a reporter, and should have remained impartial to report, not chose to editorialize for all the Dems and against all the Repubs. No better a reporter in her later years than Josef Goebbels.
TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910
De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2017
|
|
|
|
|
04-13-2004, 21:32
|
#9
|
|
Guerrilla
DunbarFC is offline
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 372
|
Be as blunt as you like !
I like, it especially in this case
__________________
“Its never too late to be what you might have been”.
|
|
|
|
|
04-13-2004, 21:38
|
#10
|
|
Moderator
Kyobanim is offline
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,984
|
I read a line in a book once but can't remember the book. I think it applies to all reporters.
"When a dog pees on a fire hydrant, he's not breaking the law, he's just being a dog."
It's the nature of the beast.
__________________
"Are you listening or just waiting to talk?"
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
"Fate rarely calls upon us at a moment of our choosing."
Optimus Prime
|
|
|
|
|
04-21-2004, 12:37
|
#11
|
|
Area Commander
Solid is offline
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 993
|
To cut back in to the original topic,
Do you think it is important for a President to be eloquent both when reading and speaking freely? Much has been made about the difference between Bush's three-word, staccato style in comparison to Blair's fluid, almost off-the-cuff speeches.
Just wondering; not fire-starting,
Solid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-21-2004, 22:36
|
#12
|
|
Guest
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Solid
To cut back in to the original topic,
Do you think it is important for a President to be eloquent both when reading and speaking freely? Much has been made about the difference between Bush's three-word, staccato style in comparison to Blair's fluid, almost off-the-cuff speeches.
Just wondering; not fire-starting,
Solid
|
It has an impact. But it surely is not necessary.
Consider that Winston Churchill was one of the greatest speakers in the last century... and Britain tossed him as soon as the end of WWII was clear.
I would say that Bill Clinton was able to stay in office partly because he was a slick speaker... that Ronald Reagan accomplished a great deal of what he did because of his ability not only to see the goal but to express it in a manner which reached the people... that John F. Kennedy is remembered as a great President primarily because of his speaking skills and Dwight Eisenhower is not primarily because of his lack of speaking skills. It didn't stop him from accomplishing a great deal.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 15:15.
|
|
|
