Go Back   Professional Soldiers ģ > Special Forces > Base Camp

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-02-2018, 07:42   #1
Intel NCO
Auxiliary
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: N/A
Posts: 60
SF Prep Course Attendance by Active Duty

Saw this posted a bit ago on S1 NET.

Key point: Active Duty will now be eligible for attendance at the SF Prep Course prior to leading into SFAS. There are three courses available so far this year (per the document).

Question: What do you guys think about this?

Text below, with the FOUO redacted.


Quote:
ALARACT 106/2017
DTG: R 282032Z NOV 17

1. REDACTED

2. REDACTED

3. (U) THE SFPC IS A THREE-WEEK PROGRAM THAT UTILIZES A HOLISTIC APPROACH TO PHYSICAL CONDITIONING THAT INCLUDES NUTRITION, HYDRATION, INJURY PREVENTION AND REHABILITATION, AND EXERCISE DEVELOPMENT. ADDITIONAL AREAS OF EMPHASIS INCLUDE THE PROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SKILLS NECESSARY FOR LAND NAVIGATION AND LEADERSHIP IN DYNAMIC AND COMPLEX ENVIRONMENTS. SFPC IS CONDUCTED IN A FIELD ENVIRONMENT.

4. (U) THE OPPORTUNITY TO ATTEND THE PRECEDING SFPC IS AVAILABLE TO ADE SOLDIERS WHO HAVE A VALID ATRRS RESERVATION CLASS QUOTA FOR THE SFAS (CLASSES 05-018, 06-018, AND 08-018). IF A SOLDIER HAS A WAIVER BEING PROCESSED FOR SFAS ATTENDANCE, THE WAIVER MUST BE CLEARED PRIOR TO SCHEDULING FOR SFPC. ALL CANDIDATES MUST MEET SPECIAL FORCES RECRUITMENT PREREQUISITES AND VOLUNTEERS MUST CONTACT THEIR SORB POINT OF CONTACT TO REQUEST ATTENDANCE.

5. REDACTED

6. (U) A TRAP ACTION IS REQUIRED TO SUPPORT TRAINING SEAT REQUIREMENTS AND CLASS SEAT RESERVATIONS FOR CLASSES BY COMMANDER, U.S. ARMY RECRUITING COMMAND, SPECIAL OPERATIONS RECRUITING BATTALION. FUNDING TO SUPPORT ALL ACTIVE DUTY ENLISTED SOLDIERS, EXCEPT THOSE STATIONED AT FORT BRAGG, VOLUNTEERING TO ATTEND SFPC PRIOR TO SFAS WILL UTILIZE MTSA FUNDING. SERVICE MEMBERS WILL ATTEND TRAINING IN A FIELD DUTY STATUS WITH LODGING PROVIDED AT NO COST TO THE SERVICE MEMBER. ALL IN-SERVICE ACTIVE DUTY ENLISTED APPROVED TO ATTEND WILL TRAVEL ON A SINGLE ORDER ISSUED TO COVER THE DURATION OF SFPC AND SFAS, APPROXIMATELY 51 DAYS.

7. (U) THE FOLLOWING DEPICTS THE REPORT DATES FOR SFPC WITH FOLLOW-ON SFAS:

*Edited for Readability; Dates in ATRRS*
SFPC CLASS 04-18; 05-18; 07-18
SFAS CLASS 05-18; 06-18; 08-18

8. (U) ALL IN-SERVICE ACTIVE DUTY ENLISTED STUDENTS ARRIVING FOR SFPC TRAINING, AT THE SPECIAL WARFARE CENTER AND SCHOOL, WILL REPORT TO THE SPECIAL WARFARE CENTER AND SCHOOL PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER (SWCSPAC), LOCATED ON THE 6THFLOOR, WING B, OF THE FORT BRAGG SOLDIER SUPPORT CENTER, BUILDING 4-2843 NORMANDY DRIVE. FOR ARRIVALS DURING NORMAL DUTY HOURS, REPORT TO THE SWCSPAC RECEPTION DESK, LOCATED ON THE 6TH FLOOR, WING B. FOR AFTER DUTY HOURS ARRIVALS, REPORT TO THE STAFF DUTY DESK LOCATED NEAR THE MAIN ENTRANCE ON THE 1ST FLOOR AND INDICATE THAT YOU ARE REPORTING FOR SFPC TRAINING.

9. REDACTED

10. (U) THIS ALARACT MESSAGE EXPIRES ON 30 SEPTEMBER 2018.
__________________
Very Respectfully,
Intel NCO
Intel NCO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2018, 09:42   #2
SF_BHT
Quiet Professional
 
SF_BHT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sneaking back and forth across the Border
Posts: 6,628
Get out and exercise, ruck and be mentally prepared. You do not need a prep course to succeed if you have the mentality, drive and are what they are looking for.

This give me the answers to the test need to stop.
SF_BHT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2018, 12:06   #3
CDRODA396
Quiet Professional
 
CDRODA396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 459
IMO we are not looking for the guy who needs a helping hand to get prepared for Selection or the Q. If he is not a self-starter, motivated to do the research to know what to expect (used to be hard, now a days there are books, the internet, etc.), and prepare for it, then they should stay in Big Army where someone can hold their hand and tell them everything they need to know.

Unfortunately this is the by-product of several other discussions, growth of the force, recruiting shortcomings, etc. Right now the enlisted MOS's are not recruiting enough to make mission even if every one starting Selection made it, so what to do..? I guess this is one COA.
__________________
"Excellence is its own punishment..."
CDRODA396 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2018, 12:38   #4
sinjefe
Quiet Professional
 
sinjefe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,987
The whole idea of a "prep" course for an assessment is disgusting.
__________________
"Were you born a fat, slimy, scumbag, puke, piece 'o shit, Private Pyle, or did you have to work at it?" - GySgt Hartman
sinjefe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2018, 20:51   #5
abc_123
Quiet Professional
 
abc_123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 2,292
Disgusting? You guys must be real old.

I received a sample training program booklet(?) from SWCS along with my acceptance letter for Selection. So I had it easy after all. Ha! Just joking QPs who commented. I'm with you. I know and agree where you are coming from. Funny, I spent a lot of time thinking about that training program that I received and whether it was actually "the best" or perhaps it was, in reality, not adequate, and rather part of the selection process. Trying to see if I would underachieve...

I decided that it was probably bullshit, and anyway not what I personally needed to be successful. I determined that failure was me hurting myself or being too burnt out before selection to succeed, and short of that I was good. Grip strength, rope climbing technique, pullups, foot toughness, leg strength and ruck marching endurance, running endurance , and swimming, was what I figured I needed and what I worked on. I knew I knew land nav so I figured I was good there... I figured I would do the best that I could short of hurting myself and made up my own program and single mindedly pursued that at the detriment to everything else... to include a long term relationship that I was in. (e.g. I know it's your birthday, honey, but today is my long ruck day so I need to take a raincheck on dinner until tomorrow.). Funny, I never really felt the need for a butt buddy to hold my hand during my training. Looking back, I guess I believed that it was an individual journey that I needed to walk alone. That I would succeed or fail at...on my own. I DID NOT WANT TO TIE MY SUCCESS OR FAILURE TO ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL. Sure, I looked for G2, but the best that I got was some foot care info and standard Ranger School prep BS. So I went with that.

And in this one post is more information and confirmation on how to pass SF selection than I EVER received. Maybe that's bad?
__________________
The Main Thing is to keep the Main Thing the Main Thing
abc_123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2018, 06:18   #6
miclo18d
Quiet Professional
 
miclo18d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Occupied Northlandia
Posts: 1,697
Quote:
Originally Posted by abc_123 View Post
Disgusting? You guys must be real old.

I received a sample training program booklet(?) from SWCS along with my acceptance letter for Selection. So I had it easy after all. Ha! Just joking QPs who commented. I'm with you. I know and agree where you are coming from. Funny, I spent a lot of time thinking about that training program that I received and whether it was actually "the best" or perhaps it was, in reality, not adequate, and rather part of the selection process. Trying to see if I would underachieve...

I decided that it was probably bullshit, and anyway not what I personally needed to be successful. I determined that failure was me hurting myself or being too burnt out before selection to succeed, and short of that I was good. Grip strength, rope climbing technique, pullups, foot toughness, leg strength and ruck marching endurance, running endurance , and swimming, was what I figured I needed and what I worked on. I knew I knew land nav so I figured I was good there... I figured I would do the best that I could short of hurting myself and made up my own program and single mindedly pursued that at the detriment to everything else... to include a long term relationship that I was in. (e.g. I know it's your birthday, honey, but today is my long ruck day so I need to take a raincheck on dinner until tomorrow.). Funny, I never really felt the need for a butt buddy to hold my hand during my training. Looking back, I guess I believed that it was an individual journey that I needed to walk alone. That I would succeed or fail at...on my own. I DID NOT WANT TO TIE MY SUCCESS OR FAILURE TO ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL. Sure, I looked for G2, but the best that I got was some foot care info and standard Ranger School prep BS. So I went with that.

And in this one post is more information and confirmation on how to pass SF selection than I EVER received. Maybe that's bad?
Same here. Went to the recruiter and got a blue covered booklet. I read through it and threw it in the trash. I felt it was meant for someone that was coming from an MI posting in Washington DC. My LRS 12 mile standard was already 3hrs with a 50 lb ruck and we frequently did 65 lb rucks for PT. Land nav skills have always been excellent and we taught Lat/Long at the detachment because you never knew what maps you would get. My train up was a 6 miler and a 12 miler before I went on block leave and the came back and went straight to Bragg. SFAS was like a 21 day LRS PT/Landnav course!

5th group was probably 1/10th made up of guys from my detachment that wanted to stay at Ft Campbell. We were definitely an SF feeder unit.

I was 30 when I went and started at the back of the pack because all of the young guys would sprint out. I really thought I was doing horrible. But the young guys would peter out quickly and I always finished in the top 3rd for running and rucking and almost every time, 1st in land nav. All that with 2 herniated discs.

They are definitely breaking their very own SOF Truths and Iím pretty sure they know it and donít give a shit. Itís all about the numbers. And with attrition of us FOGs and an added 4th Bn. The numbers arenít there. When I got to Group there were only 5 teams per company. It wasnít until our 2nd tour to Astan before we stood up a 6th team and thatís when we started seeing some less than stellar performers creeping in.

Why donít we reduce our Group requirements? Cut out a team in every company and fill up the ranks again. Get rid of Pre-selection and send those cadre back to their groups.
__________________
"The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles." ó Jeff Cooper
miclo18d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2018, 22:12   #7
CSB
Quiet Professional
 
CSB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Clarksville, TN
Posts: 1,159
Quote:
The whole idea of a "prep" course for an assessment is disgusting.
I agree 100%.

And the same applies to "Ranger or "Pre-Ranger"

Part of the assessment is a gut check of the candidate without structured pre-training.
CSB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2018, 21:39   #8
TrapperFrank
Quiet Professional
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Newnan, Georgia
Posts: 371
Is this along the lines of the old Pre-Phase training conducted while waiting to go to Phase I?
TrapperFrank is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:26.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ģ
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies