Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > At Ease > General Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-04-2004, 17:58   #16
ghuinness
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Carl Hiaasen Opinion on FL Voting. Some parts are funny.

Posted on Sun, Jun. 27, 2004

In this election, nothing will go wrongg

BY CARL HIAASEN

Late-night comedians are already making snarky jokes insinuating that Florida will botch the upcoming presidential election.

Enough already. One little fiasco that changed the course of history and dumped democracy on its ear, and they just can't let it be.

Well, forget what happened back in 2000. This is a new day, a new year and a new era of modernized voting technology. No more butterfly ballots, no more hanging chads, no more frenetic recounts.

As Gov. Jeb Bush declared last week, ``Floridians can be confident our state is fully prepared for the upcoming election season and the ones to come.''

All Americans should share that hearty confidence.

After the 2000 mess, Florida was one of the first states to rush out and purchase touch-screen voting machines. These babies weren't cheap, either, even though we didn't spring for the top-end model that gives each voter a paper receipt.

You might have read recently about a minor problem with the new machines being used in 11 counties. Not to worry -- the bugs are being worked out.

Here's what happened. During two municipal elections in Miami-Dade, the touch-screen devices failed to provide a full electronic log of ballot activity. Simply put, the machines were unable to recreate a complete record of who voted and how they voted.

Admittedly, without such a log it would be difficult to do an accurate recount, in the event of a close election. Nor do we dispute that tests conducted on the new machines found that, on other occasions, votes simply vanished when the totals were transferred for tabulation.

The manufacturer of the machines, Electronic Systems & Software, says that it has invented a software ''patch'' that will fix the glitch, although the state has yet to install it.

In the meantime, ES&S suggests that election workers download vote totals from each touch-screen unit onto laptop computers. This will take at least five minutes per machine, and there are 7,200 machines in Miami-Dade alone.

That means a full statewide recount might not be finished until, oh, the winter of 2007. But don't worry -- should you die of old age while waiting for the recount, your vote will stand. Unless, perhaps, you're one of the convicted felons whose name may be summarily erased from the voter rolls.

`No voter left behind'

Last month, the state ordered local elections officials to begin purging 47,000 voters as possible felons who had served their sentences but hadn't yet gotten their civil rights reinstated.

Because many of the applicants were African Americans, who tend to be Democrats, critics accused Gov. Bush of trying to disenfranchise those who might vote against his brother in the November presidential election.

Bush responded by speeding up clemency requests, and recently he announced that voting rights have been restored for 20,861 Floridians with past felony convictions.

Approximately 50,000 others with more-serious criminal records must appear personally before the governor and the cabinet. However, there's absolutely no truth to the rumor that those wearing Bush-Cheney sweatshirts will be moved to the top of the list.

Here in Florida, our new motto is: No voter left behind.

To that end, the governor has signed a law abolishing the requirement that all absentee ballots must be witnessed by a third party.

You might recall that contested absentee ballots played a large role in George W. Bush's puny 537-vote margin of victory four years ago here in the Sunshine State.

Among our 67 counties seemed to exist oddly differing standards for ballots sent in by absentee voters. What was accepted and counted in one jurisdiction was sometimes rejected and discarded in another.

But by eliminating the witness requirement, our Legislature has generously made it possible for practically anyone -- living or dead, real or imaginary -- to cast an absentee vote in Florida.

No more costly investigations of ballot brokers who prey on senior citizens and immigrants. No more embarrassing revelations of deceased citizens rising up to vote.

From now on, the legitimacy of each absentee vote can be determined only by visually comparing the signature on the ballot with that on the registration roll.

More than 416,000 Floridians voted absentee in 2000, and the number will be higher this fall. Obviously, there aren't enough election workers to check the authenticity of every signature, which is the whole point.

The second best thing to a free election is a scandal-free election, and ballots that can't be investigated can't very well blow up into a scandal. So let the comics make their snide little jokes.

Touch-free voting machines that leave no paper trail, absentee ballots that need no witnesses -- who says Florida's political leaders didn't learn anything from the debacle of 2000?

Just wait and see.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2004, 17:54   #17
ghuinness
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
About Time !
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2004, 19:57   #18
Ghostrider
Tank Boy
 
Ghostrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: KCMO
Posts: 171
Quote:
Originally posted by ghuinness
About Time !
Right on....what concerns me is that there isn't greater outrage. The more I think about it the more angry I become.
__________________
To do nothing makes failure inevitable.
Ghostrider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2004, 20:24   #19
Gypsy
Area Commander
 
Gypsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Midwest
Posts: 7,107
Quote:
Originally posted by Ghostrider
Right on....what concerns me is that there isn't greater outrage. The more I think about it the more angry I become.
The media is too busy with...you know....Michael Moore and all the doom and gloom in Iraq...

I'm drafting a letter to the Speaker of the House....perhaps more people could do the same.

Congressman J. Dennis Hastert
235 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515

Phone: 202-225-2976
Fax: 202-225-0697
__________________
My Heroes wear camouflage.
Gypsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2004, 20:41   #20
Airbornelawyer
Moderator
 
Airbornelawyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,938
Quote:
Originally posted by The Reaper
I would wager a small sum that more military votes were invalidated in the 2000 election than minority votes.

Can the UN monitor that as well?

They could just go to Iraq and collect the 140,000 votes there in person.

TR
The question of absentee ballots by military members is just one of many issues the media didn't care about too much because they inured to Bush/Cheney's benefit:

Absentee ballots

Federal overseas ballots (the ones you get at your embassy or your overseas base arranges to get at the embassy) heavily skewer toward Republicans because most are cast by servicemembers or businessmen working abroad. They went Bush/Cheney, 63.3% and Gore/Lieberman 33.6%.

But federal overseas ballots are just one category of absentee ballots. Many military personnel cast regular absentee ballots that they or a family member obtain from their county election officials. There is no separate breakdown of these military ballots from absentee ballots from other sources and, indeed, there is no breakdown in the county-by-county statistics of absentee ballots from regular election day ballots.

The real scandal in absentee ballots was not the undercounting of military ballots, which hurt Bush/Cheney, but the likely overcounting of certain other absentee ballots which helped Gore/Lieberman. These included a number of cases where people went to nursing homes and "helped" the elderly voters express their almost uniform support of the Democratic ticket.

Excuse me, but your chad is dangling

Of course, the scandal we are all familiar with is that of the chad; that is, the undervotes, where the pin failed to penetrate ("dimpled chad") or fully detach the chad ("hanging chad"), and the overvotes, where more than one hole was punched. A third category is the invalid write-in, where someone punched a chad and wrote in a candidate, or where the write-in name was illegible.

But hidden in all that media talk of disenfranchised would-be Palm Beach County Gore voters who voted for Buchanan is this fact: the rate of overvotes/undervotes/invalid write-ins as a percentage of voter turnout in Palm Beach County was 6.43%. In Dade and Broward, the other two counties the Gore team and the media focused on, the percentages were 4.37% and 2.49%, respectively. Of the ten counties with the highest percentages of invalidated ballots, eight were heavily Bush over Gore. In Duval, for example, it was 9.23% (the statewide percentage was 2.93%).

In Palm Beach County, total voter turnout was 462,588, and 433,186 presidential votes were cast. Bush/Cheney took 152,951 (35.3%) and Gore/Lieberman took 269,732 (62.3%). Based on that percentage above, about 29,700 votes weren't counted. If we assume the breakdown of these would have been the same as those counted, and some voter intent could have been discerned from all of these invalidated ballots, Gore might have added about 18,500 votes in my home county and Bush might have added 10,500 or so.

But in Duval County, that 9.23% rate means that with a voter turnout of 291,626, some 26,900 votes weren't counted. Presidential votes totaled 264,636, with Bush/Cheney taking 57.5% and Gore/Lieberman taking 40.8%. Applying the same assumptions as above, Bush might have netted an additional 4,500 or so votes, erasing much of Gore's gains down south. In Collier County (the Naples area), the difference was starker - Gore might have gained 1,030 votes, but Bush would have gained almost 2,090.

Naturally, Gore's people weren't pushing for recounts in Duval or Collier Counties, or in any of the other heavily Bush/Cheney counties. Gore didn't want the hoped-for gains in Dade, Broward and Palm Beach erased by Bush/Cheney gains in places like Duval and Escambia counties.

There is no empirical reason to believe that a statewide recount of all those invalidated votes would have resulted in a breakdown between Bush and Gore greater than that from votes that were counted. I suppose the operating theory is that there were more incompetent Democratic voters than Republican voters, so a higher percentage of the overvotes and undervotes should have been Gore votes than Bush votes. That was certainly what was claimed in Palm Beach, where the stories were all of Gore voters who accidentally voted for Buchanan because of that infernal butterfly ballot. And of course, the Duval counterargument is that nefarious Republicans were invalidating Democratic votes to deliver the county to Bush (but the same argument could be made with regard to Palm Beach's Democrat-controlled election commission).

What time you got, mister?

There is one other scandal. of course - the Western Counties Time Zone Controversy. Ten of Florida's 67 counties are located in the Central Time Zone, one hour behind the rest of the state. The major networks began calling Florida for Gore before polls closed in these counties. All of these counties - Bay, Calhoun, Escambia, Gulf, Holmes, Jackson, Okaloosa, Santa Rosa, Walton and Washington - were overwhelmingly Bush/Cheney counties. Bush outpolled Gore 237,769 to 111,580 in these 10 counties.

It can never be known how many people on their way to a polling place at the last minute, or how many standing in line at a polling place at closing time, failed to vote once they heard the networks call the state. It may be that there weren't all that many, but even if it were one half of one percent of Bush voters in those counties, that would have added some 1,200 votes to Bush's total. Given the 537-vote difference between Bush and Gore, that would have been significant.

I haven't even addressed the 2,000 or so illegal votes in Florida in 2000 (people voting twice, felons voting, etc.), most of which seemed to be in the Democrats' favor.

In sum, the mythology of Florida 2000 is of disenfranchised Democrats and Bush "stealing" the election, when it may very well be that what really happened is that despite all their best efforts, the Democrats merely failed to steal the election themselves (unlike Wisconsin, where theft appears to have worked - Connie Milstein, a New York Democratic activist, was caught on camera bribing the homeless with cigarettes to vote for Al Gore, while some 361 felons were found to have illegally voted in Milwaukee County alone).
Airbornelawyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2004, 20:43   #21
tache18x
Asset
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: charlotte, nc
Posts: 21
The liberal media slants everything!!! fuck 'em.
__________________
Alpha Phi Alpha Fraterinty, 1906, Brahahahi, Brahahahi, damn that sh@t is cold!!!!! From Martin Luther King to Jesse Owens to W.E.B DuBois!!!!! We got that!!!
tache18x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2004, 05:00   #22
lrd
Area Commander
 
lrd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: MD
Posts: 1,012
Quote:
Originally posted by Gypsy
The media is too busy with...you know....Michael Moore and all the doom and gloom in Iraq...

I'm drafting a letter to the Speaker of the House....perhaps more people could do the same.

Congressman J. Dennis Hastert
235 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515

Phone: 202-225-2976
Fax: 202-225-0697
Will do. Thanks for the contact info.
lrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2004, 14:07   #23
ghuinness
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Just heard FOX News is covering this at 8:00pm tonight on the "Heartland" show.
(Sat July 10).

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,71246,00.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2004, 20:16   #24
ghuinness
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
THIS is beyond belief.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2004, 23:17   #25
Gypsy
Area Commander
 
Gypsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Midwest
Posts: 7,107
If this is true I am thoroughly shocked and beyond disappointed in this decision.
__________________
My Heroes wear camouflage.
Gypsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Are we at war with Islam? NousDefionsDoc Terrorism 1381 10-16-2013 23:02
Madrid NousDefionsDoc Terrorism 79 11-29-2004 05:09
US Election Monitors NousDefionsDoc The Soapbox 28 11-02-2004 23:08
Venezuela lrd Insurgencies & Guerrilla Warfare 22 09-09-2004 09:29
june to september pulque Terrorism 0 04-25-2004 22:34



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:32.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies