Medical units are deployed as part of a force package, based on the number and type of other forces deployed. They are not usually deployed in excess to handle to treat anticipated civilian casualties. Furthermore the Iraqi civilian hospital system, while dilapidated, was intact. Obviously, any sane person would rather be treated by US doctors and our medical systemn than their own. This tends to overload our care system regardless of casualties.
Once these civilians are in US care, they get treated the same as US personnel.
Frankly, I do not want to be the one to write SSG Schmidlap's wife and kids and tell them that their husband died because we had a bunch of enemy civilians with malnutrition in the beds, and no room for their husband/father/son.
The Geneva and Hague Conventions prescribe health care responsibilities for non-combatants, we are responsible for them.
Once combat is over, an assessment of the indig hospital and health care system is made, and the effort directed at getting the civilian care facilities back on line ASAP.
HTH.
TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910
De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
|