Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > At Ease > General Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-26-2004, 14:41   #1
rubberneck
Area Commander
 
rubberneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Buckingham, Pa.
Posts: 1,746
Unhappy Medical help for Iraqi's

I was watching a documentary on Nova last night that followed the deployment of Army medical teams at the outset of OIF and I was disturbed at what I saw.

According to the Doctors interviewed said that they could provide treatments to Iraqi's only under the following conditions. They had to face the immediate risk of dying, losing a limb or their eyesight or their wounds had to be directly caused by our troops.

While it makes sense to restrict aid to only the most seriously wounded so that our medical staff has the rseources to focus on wounded US troops it's real world application seemed stupid in my humble unimformed opinion.

The problem is that our Doctors were turning away injuried Iraqi civilians because they weren't critical or because their wounds were the direct result of US actions but we were providing care to Iraqi insurgents/soldiers who were directly involved with trying to kill our troops because we caused their injuries. Wouldn't make more sense to force combatants back into the decimated Iraqi healthcare system while releaving that system of non-combatant injuries?

This makes no sense to me. Turn away potential allies while rendering aid to those who openly oppose our forces. Wouldn't it make more sense to send the message that if you get hurt fighting us don't expect any help while at the same time saying that we want to help all non-combatants.

I don't know if things have changed since the story was filled but it just seemed to be ass backwards.
rubberneck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2004, 15:00   #2
The Reaper
Quiet Professional
 
The Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland
Posts: 24,780
Medical units are deployed as part of a force package, based on the number and type of other forces deployed. They are not usually deployed in excess to handle to treat anticipated civilian casualties. Furthermore the Iraqi civilian hospital system, while dilapidated, was intact. Obviously, any sane person would rather be treated by US doctors and our medical systemn than their own. This tends to overload our care system regardless of casualties.

Once these civilians are in US care, they get treated the same as US personnel.

Frankly, I do not want to be the one to write SSG Schmidlap's wife and kids and tell them that their husband died because we had a bunch of enemy civilians with malnutrition in the beds, and no room for their husband/father/son.

The Geneva and Hague Conventions prescribe health care responsibilities for non-combatants, we are responsible for them.

Once combat is over, an assessment of the indig hospital and health care system is made, and the effort directed at getting the civilian care facilities back on line ASAP.

HTH.

TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910

De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
The Reaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2004, 15:29   #3
rubberneck
Area Commander
 
rubberneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Buckingham, Pa.
Posts: 1,746
Thanks for the reply. I guess what got me so pissed off is that an insurgent who was wounded while in combat with US Troops was entitled to treatment while an Iraqi citizen who was wounded by the actions of insurgents wasn't. I by no means would ever advocate that the health and the welfare of our troops be placed behind any Iraqi combatant or not.
rubberneck is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
18D Medical Training Skill set Eagle5US 18D 35 05-31-2010 17:30
18D job description Eagle5US 18D 8 05-01-2010 21:40
Review: TSSI M-4 Special Operations Medical Pack Maple Flag The Aid Bag 12 10-06-2004 14:37
Basic Medical info 18C/GS 0602 Medical Pearls Of Wisdom 5 06-22-2004 13:17
Hearts and Minds NousDefionsDoc Medical Pearls Of Wisdom 6 05-24-2004 09:11



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 00:51.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies