03-26-2009, 17:38
|
#1
|
SF Candidate
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 30
|
Trust and SF Values?
Hello SF Community,
First of all, thank you for viewing my post. I have looked for answers to my question, but could not find them, so I decided to post it here.
Over the past few months, I have started to try and reach some of my longer term goals to lead kind of life I would like to lead. The first of which to to become a member of the Army Special Forces.
This has been a goal of mine over the past few years and has increasing become more and more important to me, moving from idea to action and obtainable. I've worked hard to get where I am today to reach that goal and started the next part of the process. I am focusing on the 25m target and I am taking each part one step at a time.
The last step I have been working on and nearly completed was simply joining the army.
While waiting at MEPS to sign my contract and receive a ship date, they gave me a ship date for the end of June. I repeatedly told my recruiter and the head Sergeant at the recruiting station that I am not available to ship until mid-August for other commitments that I have made that I cannot get out of. I even told the counselor this when he was finding my job.
There was much deliberation and trying to get me to sign this contract at this date because they said that they couldn't get any dates in the future that I requested. They repeatedly told me this, going as far to get a second recruiter from the request of my current recruiter to take me to a back room urging me to sign the contract on the premise that if two recruiters say it, it must be true.
He said that I can always "reno" my contract to push it out further over and over until mid-August, which I didn't want to accept. He tried many tactics in the back room to get me to sign the contract, ranging from guilt that they put so much time into me to lying and saying that it's my only chance ever to join like this and finally, the real kicker, that if I don't sign this now, I am not SF material because I have trust issues because I don't trust his or my recruiter's word that they can renegotiate my signed written contract that I "certainly" won't ship until August, regardless of what my contract actually says. I then mentioned something to him about what I thought some SF values were in loyalty to the commitments that I have and that were made clear for months when I first stepped into the recruiter's office and also the value of being certain of what you want and standing by that.
Once a civilian worker heard that the recruiter told me this, from his mouth, she immediately said "I never want to hear the word 'reno' out of your mouth Sargent", to which the story started changing. I stood tall in that I would not sign a contract that did not say an August ship date, leading to the ultimate question of this post comes about.
Ultimately, I talked to the 1st Sargent of the entire region and he said that he called the office and other people around the country and it was true that there weren't any jobs to ship out in August, but that is because the openings do not populate more than 90 days out, hence the latest date possible today at a June shipment. This 1st Sargent finally seemed to be the telling me the truth. This further makes sense that this be the case because they said they couldn't even pull a later ship date on an 11x or any other contract.
With the background information in place, the real question that I wanted to ask the SF Community is, was I wrong in not signing the contract and violating the recruiter's supposed values of Special Forces? Was he right in saying that me not trusting his word over a written contract at this stage is not SF material and I would fail right out of the "Q" course and finish as an 11b anyway?
I do believe that what both recruiters and the counselor were saying to me was wrong, especially in light of what the 1st Sargent said.
I am still now fully qualified to sign the 18x contract and I am still good and qualified for another two years. I simply can wait until June when 90 days out, the spots available for August will have populated and fully sign then.
I didn't mean for this post as a forum to vent my frustration. I am genuinely asking because I believe that trust is definitely a very large part of not only SF, but of the entire army and life in a whole and this kind of took me back and made me wonder if he is representing it truthfully.
Thank you very much for reading this.
version13
Last edited by version13; 03-26-2009 at 18:08.
|
version13 is offline
|
|
03-26-2009, 18:15
|
#2
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 933
|
Just FYI it's sergeant not sargent....
Is your recruiter SF qualified? If he is, he may have a point. If he's not, he has no authority of what SF values are or are not. There's a reason in the SF Questions section of this board, non-SF personnel do not answer SF questions.
I would only trust what you have in black and white, not a promise by a recruiter. A written contract always supercedes a verbal contract. Would he note the change in writing on your contract before you signed?
|
koz is offline
|
|
03-26-2009, 18:20
|
#3
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fayetteville
Posts: 13,080
|
Sergeant
Sergeant - It's Sergeant.
The search button is your friend.
"Hey koz - I see we cross posted"
|
Pete is offline
|
|
03-26-2009, 18:37
|
#4
|
SF Candidate
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 30
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by koz
Just FYI it's sergeant not sargent....
|
Thanks for the clarification. Being of my current generation, I rely too much on spell-checker built into FireFox
Quote:
Originally Posted by koz
Is your recruiter SF qualified? If he is, he may have a point. If he's not, he has no authority of what SF values are or are not. There's a reason in the SF Questions section of this board, non-SF personnel do not answer SF questions.
|
He is not SF qualified; I asked him. He has the "Old Ironsides" patch signifying the 1st Armor. He said that he has talked to a coupe SF guys for a little bit, but still admits that he has had minimal interaction with them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by koz
I would only trust what you have in black and white, not a promise by a recruiter. A written contract always supercedes a verbal contract. Would he note the change in writing on your contract before you signed?
|
He would not change anything in writing before I signed it, hence I would also not take full trust in what he had to say.
Thank you very much for you help.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete
Sergeant - It's Sergeant.
The search button is your friend.
"Hey koz - I see we cross posted"
|
Noted above on the spelling error; thank you, too.
The Search button and I are very intimate. I would go as to far as to say, we've passed the friendship phase and have moved on to bigger things.
|
version13 is offline
|
|
03-26-2009, 18:41
|
#5
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 933
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by version13
He is not SF qualified; I asked him. He has the "Old Ironsides" patch signifying the 1st Armor. He said that he has talked to a coupe SF guys for a little bit, but still admits that he has had minimal interaction with them.
|
I think that should answer your question.
Now go do push-ups..
|
koz is offline
|
|
03-26-2009, 18:46
|
#6
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Occupied Pineland
Posts: 4,701
|
Sounds like a recruiter is having problems meeting "mission" and wants to get you signed on the dotted line during 3QTR. The 1SG was right; however, your problem is "the truth is a moving target". Issues beyond his control may change the truth several times before you are ready to sign. Accession missions (recruitment quotas) are based on MILPERCEN messages. The closer you get to the end of the fiscal year (01 Oct) the more likely that annual goals for accessions in particular MOSs will have been met and the career field will be closed until a new quota is established next year. Budget constraints are already affecting retention (re-enlistment) quotas. Meet your current commitments but be prepared to have to compromise the timing for the rest of your goals. Good luck.
__________________
A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.
~ Marcus Tullius Cicero (42B.C)
|
Peregrino is offline
|
|
03-26-2009, 19:46
|
#7
|
SF Candidate
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 30
|
Thanks
First of all, thank you all again for your replies and clarifications.
Secondly and on a part of the topic, can someone explain a bit on the trust aspect of being a member of a team? I assume you would all trust each other with your life and it's importance, but how would you gauge this on importance and comparison to other jobs or aspects of life.
Thirdly:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mitch
Just a question V13. If you had to make a decision between this opportunity vs. your commitment? If it was a onetime deal - take it or leave it - what would you do?
|
If it was a onetime deal, I would take it. However, from everything I've read, researched, been told, jobs do not close forever and the entire situation seemed a little off and not fully accurate as relayed by my recruiter and MEPS, so I went with my instinct... nay, my knowledge and I chose to wait.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mitch
Mitch (still married after 38 years to a true SF wife)
|
Congratulations, honestly. At least from my perspective, that is true dedication.
My father spent months on end away from my mother and my 5 siblings at posts where his family couldn't necessarily go.
Last edited by version13; 03-26-2009 at 19:52.
|
version13 is offline
|
|
03-26-2009, 20:11
|
#8
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Texas, near Cow Town
Posts: 351
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by version13
First of all, thank you all again for your replies and clarifications.
Secondly and on a part of the topic, can someone explain a bit on the trust aspect of being a member of a team? I assume you would all trust each other with your life and it's importance, but how would you gauge this on importance and comparison to other jobs or aspects of life.
|
Your word is your bond - doesn't matter where you work or what you're doing.
You don't leave your coworkers high and dry - do that more than once and you won't last in the real world any longer than in the wonderful world of SF.
Keeping promises and commitments, telling the truth, keeping quiet; someone tells you something and says keep it to yourself (or even if they don’t) you don’t talk about it until they do. Why wouldn’t you practice that at a Bank or a Restaurant, or a Factory? Of course anything less on the Team would follow you around for a Career – guys that do that usually end up as the BN armorer or work S4 (supply). They don’t usually feel welcome on the Team.
(Don’t mean to generalize – I knew a lot of S4 guys I would take anywhere – although, I can’t say the same about too many of the armorers ).
__________________
Mitch
Last edited by Mitch; 03-26-2009 at 20:20.
|
Mitch is offline
|
|
03-26-2009, 20:47
|
#9
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 514
|
Kid, you're on the right track.
Don't let yourself get railroaded. Hopefully you have the common sense to know when that is. If not, you're not going to do well in our little course.
Tell a person what you can do. Be honest. And then follow through. If its not good enough for them, they won't play ball. Then, if its worth enough to you, bend.
Trust means the same thing in the Army that it means in the regular world. And I, personally, wouldn't trust anyone I didn't know. FWIW.
They'll still need you in August.
Now go run 3 miles.
__________________
El Diablo sabe mas por viejo que por diablo.
|
D9 (RIP) is offline
|
|
03-26-2009, 19:35
|
#10
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Texas, near Cow Town
Posts: 351
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by version13
While waiting at MEPS to sign my contract and receive a ship date, they gave me a ship date for the end of June. I repeatedly told my recruiter and the head Sergeant at the recruiting station that I am not available to ship until mid-August for other commitments that I have made that I cannot get out of. I even told the counselor this when he was finding my job.
version13
|
Just a question V13. If you had to make a decision between this opportunity vs. your commitment? If it was a onetime deal - take it or leave it - what would you do?
One thing I observed after a career in SF; the SF life does not lend itself to the best family life. Most guys I know - me included - tended to put SF in front of family. Also, lots of SF marriages end in divorce (more I believe than the regular Army). Opportunities come, in many cases, just once in a career - those who take them regardless of the consequences to their wives and family were the norm in the SF community in my time. But things may have changed recently.
Each team usually had a guy who would not deploy because his wife was pregnant - in spite of the fact that these guys were doing the right thing by their family, they left their team a man short. This was remembered.
Mitch (still married after 38 years to a true SF wife)
__________________
Mitch
|
Mitch is offline
|
|
03-27-2009, 06:25
|
#11
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Nashville
Posts: 956
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mitch
Just a question V13. If you had to make a decision between this opportunity vs. your commitment? If it was a onetime deal - take it or leave it - what would you do?
One thing I observed after a career in SF; the SF life does not lend itself to the best family life. Most guys I know - me included - tended to put SF in front of family. Also, lots of SF marriages end in divorce (more I believe than the regular Army). Opportunities come, in many cases, just once in a career - those who take them regardless of the consequences to their wives and family were the norm in the SF community in my time. But things may have changed recently.
Each team usually had a guy who would not deploy because his wife was pregnant - in spite of the fact that these guys were doing the right thing by their family, they left their team a man short. This was remembered.
Mitch (still married after 38 years to a true SF wife)
|
V13 I can't add to this post much else. As to the decisions of choices, there is always a consequence. The balance of career and family is tenuous, and there are many "crossroads" in life that lead to the "end". So what do you what to see when you look back down the road.
As to Trust, other than some very specially dangerous jobs, every man is accepted by his team or not. Once accepted then trust is as reliable as the air that sustains us. It is there and and necessary for life. Our missions are long and isolated and team member trust is a part of survival and mission completness.
Hope this helps.
__________________
The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.
Thomas Jefferson
To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.
Thomas Jefferson
|
Blitzzz (RIP) is offline
|
|
03-27-2009, 21:31
|
#12
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Texas, near Cow Town
Posts: 351
|
Its been so long that I had forgotten what those letters meant - in case I'm not the only one - here is what Google pulled up:
P—Physical Capacity or Stamina
U—Upper Extremities
L—Lower Extremities
H—Hearing and Ears
E—Eyes
S—Psychiatric.
Read more at: http://www.us-army-info.com/pages/mos/profile.html
__________________
Mitch
Last edited by Mitch; 03-27-2009 at 21:36.
|
Mitch is offline
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:13.
|
|
|