Will NAMBLA be finally exposed

[Old Dog New Trick]

I tried so hard to stay out of this thread but, the hook was set and now I’ve taken the bait.

I believe RichL025 is badly informed and if he doesn’t know who Evan McMullen is than he is an uninformed voter.

While I may not like or agree with POTUS Trump on many levels, I whole heartedly believe he was the only chance this country had at continuing to be a Constitutional Democratic Republic. I sleep very well at night having voted for him and not against him.

It just irritates me when people trot out the usual BS about the Constitution and BOR and hold anyone other than the Federal Government accountable for it. That really gets my BP up. Stupid is as stupid does...

Cheers

ETA: P.S. I got only two words to describe (thus far along) the commitment of DJT to the Constitution and Law - Neal Gorsuch. [Yes, I know there are scores of others already and yet to be nominated for life-long tenure at Federal Appellate, Circut, and Appeals levels of appointed judges. Maybe the only reason I voted for him. The consolation prize HRC would have had the same historic opportunity to fill those positions with people I vehemently disagree with.]

[Golf1echo]

"I for one am very glad the DNC and Hillary’s campaign manager used that material and opened Pandora’s Box on sexual deviants in Hollywood and elsewhere because I’m enjoying the hell out of watching the dominoes fall."

Sure makes me doubt they would have " governed more effectively ". While no one is perfect it's super ironic liberal/progressives charged after President Trump with that one! Now they are watching their ranks and power base (money sources) being decimated...even their icons, a massive loss of credibility. Who would of thunk it? The old proverbial shooting yourself in the foot. I'm glad they did as it's a new era for women in a positive way. I say there are many more similar issues within their creed for anyone who chooses to open their eyes.

Next- Welfare Reform and Accountability.

[WarriorDiplomat]

Originally Posted by RichL025

Then I suggest you take some anti-emetics. So sorry to upset your delicate constitution.




I have no idea who Evan McMullen is.




I already have, and I'm on the side of our Constitution. THAT'S one of the reasons I am not a Trump fanboy - he has already demonstrated that he does not believe in our Constitution.

(HINT: Before you get all hot & bothered, read about separation of church & state, and how you cannot make laws based on someone's religion)

Well educate all of us on.this apparently I am missing the deviancy and disease.....personally anyone who thinks Hillary would have been better tells me alot about your lack of fortitude to stand against a corrupt system and go through the hard work of fixing it....out of fear or foresight?

Since you mentioned the Constitution have you read the 86 essays the Federalist papers that were the supporting reasoning for it

[RichL025]

Originally Posted by WarriorDiplomat

Well educate all of us on.this apparently I am missing the deviancy and disease.....personally anyone who thinks Hillary would have been better tells me alot about your lack of fortitude to stand against a corrupt system and go through the hard work of fixing it....out of fear or foresight?

Please go back through my posts and find where I said Hillary would have been a better president.

Your reading comprehension skills are.... lacking.

[RichL025]

Originally Posted by Old Dog New Trick

Yes but, Rich implies that the president and his (perceived) immoral views are trying to subvert the Constitution in regards to laws that the congress are responsible for.

n
First of all, I don't think I IMPLIED it, I came right out and said it.

And to be fair, I dont think I ever used the word "immoral" to describe DJT or jhis views. That's irrelevant. The only thing that's relevant is whether his actions are legal and constitutional.

"Moral" is a religious judgement. I dont know if he is a moral man or not. I have my doubts, but in my weaker moments, I have to remind myself that I am not the judge. It is not my place to judge anothers' "morals" in most circumstances (notice I made an exception - if someone wants to date one of my daughters, for example, damn sure I will pay attention to their "morals")

Originally Posted by Old Dog New Trick

As for NAMBLA - sick bunch of faggots destroying young lives.

I rather agree with you here. Dont like to use the term "faggot" since even mainstream homosexual groups have disavowed NAMBLA... you may be surprised to learn that most homosexuals find them disgusting and abhorrent as well.

[WarriorDiplomat]

Originally Posted by RichL025

Please go back through my posts and find where I said Hillary would have been a better president.

Your reading comprehension skills are.... lacking.

Well Rich I am on an iPhone and cannot cut and paste but you did say Hillary would do better job at leading but caveated with we didn't like the direction she was taking the country....perhaps it is your lack of comprehension here given the context was in regards to the President.

Leading is the job of the President in which you did state she would be better.

You can use rhetorical spin on what you said because you did not say the word President...but anyone can read the preamble and know the contextual meaning.

[WarriorDiplomat]

Originally Posted by RichL025

n
First of all, I don't think I IMPLIED it, I came right out and said it.

And to be fair, I dont think I ever used the word "immoral" to describe DJT or jhis views. That's irrelevant. The only thing that's relevant is whether his actions are legal and constitutional.

"Moral" is a religious judgement. I dont know if he is a moral man or not. I have my doubts, but in my weaker moments, I have to remind myself that I am not the judge. It is not my place to judge anothers' "morals" in most circumstances (notice I made an exception - if someone wants to date one of my daughters, for example, damn sure I will pay attention to their "morals")



I rather agree with you here. Dont like to use the term "faggot" since even mainstream homosexual groups have disavowed NAMBLA... you may be surprised to learn that most homosexuals find them disgusting and abhorrent as well.

Rich you are killing me with your superficial examinations of connecting behaviors. They only deny the organization due to it's bad publicity however many pedophiles have been openly supported by prominent LGBT activist until.....someones deviancy is outed....they have a public outcry THEN they condemn but ironically enough not until that point.

[Team Sergeant]

Originally Posted by RichL025

n
First of all, I don't think I IMPLIED it, I came right out and said it.

And to be fair, I dont think I ever used the word "immoral" to describe DJT or jhis views. That's irrelevant. The only thing that's relevant is whether his actions are legal and constitutional.

"Moral" is a religious judgement. I dont know if he is a moral man or not. I have my doubts, but in my weaker moments, I have to remind myself that I am not the judge. It is not my place to judge anothers' "morals" in most circumstances (notice I made an exception - if someone wants to date one of my daughters, for example, damn sure I will pay attention to their "morals")



I rather agree with you here. Dont like to use the term "faggot" since even mainstream homosexual groups have disavowed NAMBLA... you may be surprised to learn that most homosexuals find them disgusting and abhorrent as well.

Really, and you got this information from? CNN?



https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/moral

Definition of moral
1
a : of or relating to principles of right and wrong in behavior : ethical moral judgments
b : expressing or teaching a conception of right behavior a moral poem
c : conforming to a standard of right behavior took a moral position on the issue though it cost him the nomination
d : sanctioned by or operative on one's conscience or ethical judgment a moral obligation
e : capable of right and wrong action a moral agent
2
: probable though not proved : virtual a moral certainty
3
: perceptual or psychological rather than tangible or practical in nature or effect a moral victory moral support