If you look long and hard enough

[Richard]

Talk about a textbook case of trying to make the evidence fit the notion instead of the other way around.

Atsounding.

Richard

[Sdiver]

Originally Posted by Richard

Talk about a textbook case of trying to make the evidence fit the notion instead of the other way around.

Astounding.

Richard

Shouldn't be that big of a surprise now-a-days.

Fits right in with the media's agenda of .... "One is Guilty until proven Innocent."

[Dusty]

Originally Posted by Richard

Talk about a textbook case of trying to make the evidence fit the notion instead of the other way around.

Atsounding.

Richard

I started to pink it up, but it's too close to the truth.

BTW, is "atsounding" a word, or did you spell one wrong?

[Pete]

Originally Posted by Dusty

I started to pink it up, but it's too close to the truth.

BTW, is "atsounding" a word, or did you spell one wrong?

Richard has been making a number of typo's the last week or so. I think CA is catching up on him.

[The Reaper]

Originally Posted by Sigaba

The Tsarnaev brothers are no longer white because...?

Because they came from Central Asia?

So given the Mongol influence, they could be geographically and ethnically Asian, at least partially.

But the area of Dagestan is also part of the Caucasus, so they might be Caucasian.

http://www.infoplease.com/encycloped...#ixzz2SeSqeA5i

"An ancient area of human settlement, Dagestan belonged to Caucasian Albania in the 1st millennium B.C. It was later invaded by Huns, Persian Sassanids, and, in the 7th cent. A.D., by Arabs, who introduced Islam. Taken by the Turks in the 11th cent. and the Mongols in the 13th cent., the region became the center of a struggle between Turkey and Persia in the 15th cent. It was a Persian province when Russia annexed it by the Treaty of Gulistan in 1813. Muslim mountain dwellers resisted Russian domination until 1859, and a new revolt erupted in 1877, during the Russo-Turkish war of that year. Dagestan came under Soviet rule in 1920 and in 1921 was made an autonomous republic."

Maybe we shouldn't be putting ourselves into these neat little boxes, since most of us have a wide variety of ancestry.

Why does it really matter?

TR

[Dusty]

http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/lets...hite_american/

"However, white male privilege means white men are not collectively denigrated/targeted for those shootings — even though most come at the hands of white dudes."

[Sigaba]

Originally Posted by Dusty

http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/lets...hite_american/

"However, white male privilege means white men are not collectively denigrated/targeted for those shootings — even though most come at the hands of white dudes."

If one is going to use history to profile this cohort or to demonize that one, then how surprised should one be when others make profiles all their own?

[Gypsy]

Originally Posted by Team Sergeant

W

I'd vote impeachment but it's a no win situation with the idiot sitting in the co-pilot seat.....

True, but it would give me great satisfaction to see this arrogant joker ousted.

[Richard]

Originally Posted by Sdiver

Shouldn't be that big of a surprise now-a-days.

Fits right in with the media's agenda of .... "One is Guilty until proven Innocent."

I was referring to the tone of this thread and what it implies based upon the media's straight-forward reporting of an FBI investigation into the potential terroristic activities of a 25YO Minnesota man with possible ties to the BSM.

Astounding.

Richard

[Dusty]

Originally Posted by Sigaba

If one is going to use history to profile this cohort or to demonize that one, then how surprised should one be when others make profiles all their own?

Regardless, I'll never stop demonizing asshole cohorts.