06-22-2009, 05:38
|
#31
|
|
Asset
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: France
Posts: 16
|
I read in a French newspaper this morning that there were more votes than peoples registered on the voting lists in about 50 districts (Iran has 170 districts total)
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/23/wo...n.html?_r=1&hp
|
|
Matt B is offline
|
|
06-22-2009, 21:32
|
#32
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: OCONUS...again
Posts: 4,702
|
If it was only that simple/easy...
Quote:
Originally Posted by OcdtADF
They are not going to live under the rule of the +55 theocrats forever. This crisis will resolve itself one way or another.
If it happens now, or later it doesn’t really mater. Those people will inevitably decide Iran’s future. All they need is issues like this one to rally around.
|
1. The Iraqi government/people is NOT in place and/or stable enough too support/sustain itself.
2. The Afghan war has spread into Pakistan.
3. God only knows what "crazy-ass" N. Korea is up to.
4. The US economy is NOT at its best.
It always amazes me how people jump on the MSM bandwagon of "Democracy & Freedom" only too participate from the sidelines....
Stay safe.
__________________
“It is better to have sheep led by a lion than lions led by a sheep.”
-DE OPPRESSO LIBER-
|
|
Guy is offline
|
|
06-22-2009, 21:59
|
#33
|
|
BANNED USER
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 22
|
Guy your quote says it all
“Leaders can be removed - but you cannot "give" someone democracy - they have to create it”
What is going on inside Iran is an internal matter. It has to do with demographics as much as it does with ideology. For the sake of argument its worth simply saying that the Iranian revolution of ’79 has really yet to go through its Thermidorian Reaction phase. This issue must be settled internally. Therefore what is happening in North Korea has really got nothing to do with it.
Also there is very little we can do about it either. In fact western nations cannot be seen to be actively interfering. That would give the regime a propaganda coup that would probably be decisive in the protests.
Therefore we are all on the sidelines together
|
|
OcdtADF is offline
|
|
06-23-2009, 01:32
|
#34
|
|
Area Commander
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 4,482
|
Even Before Dispute, Iranians Split on Honesty of Elections
Quote:
Originally Posted by OcdtADF
This is essentially a generational conflict[.]
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OcdtADF
It has to do with demographics as much as it does with ideology.
|
Polling data indicate that there may be additional factors at work (story below) as does the assassination of Neda Soltan << LINK>>.
Source is here.
Related graphics are available here, here, there, and here. MOO, the last image is very interesting.
Quote:
June 16, 2009
Even Before Dispute, Iranians Split on Honesty of Elections
Urban Iranians far less likely than rural Iranians to express trust
by Julie Ray
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- A Gallup Poll conducted in Iran in 2008 found citizens divided on the honesty of their country's elections before last week's controversial presidential election: 50% of Iranians surveyed in May 2008, shortly after last year's parliamentary elections, said they were confident in their elections, while 40% said they were not.
Gallup's survey reveals striking differences in the faith that urban Iranians and rural Iranians placed in elections. Following the election in 2008, rural Iranians (66%) were nearly twice as likely as urban residents (36%) to express confidence in their elections.
Young Iranians -- who make up the lion's share of Iran's population and of those protesting the outcome of the recent election -- are less likely than older Iranians to express confidence in their elections. Forty-three percent of Iranians aged 15 to 29 said in 2008 that they had confidence, versus 56% of Iranians aged 30 and older who said the same.
Confidence in Elections Across the Globe
While just 50% of Iranians surveyed last year said they were confident in their country's elections, Iranians' confidence compared favorably with results from other countries in many parts of the world. In fact, Americans surveyed as part of the World Poll before the November 2008 U.S. presidential election were essentially as likely as Iranians to say they were confident in their country's elections (47% vs. 50%). Further, the percentage of Iranians who expressed confidence was actually higher than the 41% median confidence across more than 140 countries where this question was asked between 2006 and 2009.
Iranians' confidence compared positively with other views in the Middle East and North Africa, where the regional median for confidence in elections is 45%. Within the region, Iranians were more likely than Moroccans (20%), Iraqis (25%), Egyptians (28%), Israelis (32%), Algerians (35%), Lebanese (39%), and Yemenis (43%) to say they are confident. Iranians' confidence was more similar to that of Saudis' (49%), Palestinians' (47%), and Turks' (47%).
Compared with populations outside the Middle East and North Africa, Iranians expressed more confidence than did residents in many countries in sub-Saharan Africa, the former Soviet Union, and the Americas. However, Iranians were less likely than residents in many European and Asian countries to express confidence in their respective countries' elections.
Bottom Line
Gallup Polls reveal that Iranians were divided on the honesty of their elections before the country's current crisis. That said, Iranians turned out in record number to cast their votes on Election Day. For some urban and young Iranians who were already disillusioned, the country's recent elections may have been the last straw. After the protests end, Iran may still have the same leadership, but that leadership will likely have to work even harder to build trust and engagement within the electorate.
Survey Methods
Results are based on face-to-face interviews with approximately 1,040 adults, aged 15 and older, conducted April 30 to May 31, 2008, in Iran. For results based on the total sample of national adults, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±3.5 percentage points. The margin of error reflects the influence of data weighting. In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls.
|
Quote:
|
For the sake of argument its worth simply saying that the Iranian revolution of ’79 has really yet to go through its Thermidorian Reaction phase.
|
Does a Eurocentric perspective really help understand events in the east in their own terms?
|
|
Sigaba is offline
|
|
06-23-2009, 01:55
|
#35
|
|
BANNED USER
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 22
|
Sigaba
Everything you have argued here is totally 100% valid. I agree that there is a systemic lack of confidence in the Iranian electoral process. It seems that the Iranian’s have more confidence in their polling than we do. It’s probably impossible to know whose opinion is right. The Urban/Rural divide is also a good point to make.
What you have said about a Eurocentric position is to an extent right. It could also be argued that my statement is incorrect because all revolutions are different. It could further be said that it’s wrong because this may not be a revolution. It was a simplistic statement. I could make an articulated essay style response it wouldn’t be very interesting. Suffice to say, comparing any one situation to another is never correct but it is useful. Therefore a thermidor comparison is simplistic but useful.
Where are Iran’s Liberals?
http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009...protestors.php
Last edited by OcdtADF; 06-23-2009 at 01:58.
|
|
OcdtADF is offline
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:48.
|
|
|