White House perspective

[Team Sergeant]

Originally Posted by Billy L-bach

...the thought of another Clinton having oral sex with female interns in the oval office is down right awesome.

Look for the silver lining in the cloud:
HRC as president will make for some great late night TV show monologue material

That's some funny stuff right there.....

I'm still waiting for the secret service to release the first sex tapes of the Impeached President WJ Clinton with his cigar....... You know someone was watching.............

[cbtengr]

Originally Posted by Broadsword2004

Conservatives and the GOP cannot be seen as bullying Hillary.

So we had to dance around the current potus because of his race lest we seem to be racists, now we do not want to appear to be bullying Hillary because............... she is a girl? The hell with what the other side looks like or what gender they are, conservatives need to go after these people for what they are and what they believe in and embrace. We cannot afford another 4-8 years of the democrats leading us further into the abyss.

[ddoering]

Originally Posted by Broadsword2004

IMO, the whole "What difference does it make" bit could backfire on conservatives against Hillary come 2016. They will have to be careful. Conservatives and the GOP cannot be seen as bullying Hillary. Also Reverand Wright didn't do Obama in, Benghazi probably won't do Clinton in either. One good thing is Hillary will likely have to run to the right of Obama, and we need a conservative candidate who can eloquently, without coming across in any bullying manner, explain the flaws in all of her policies. I think she would be better than Obama though, as she is not as far-left as he is, and America won't have any appetite for more attempts at fundamentally changing America after the Ocare fiasco, provided it continues to bomb.

One thing about Hillary though is that she doesn't strike me as Presidential material. She cried in the 2008 election and complained about the Democratic party being too much of a boy's club, then at the Benghazi hearings, she blew up at the questioning; how is she going to handle the stresses of the Presidency?

Or we can just hire Tonya Harding.......

[Paslode]

Originally Posted by Broadsword2004

IMO, the whole "What difference does it make" bit could backfire on conservatives against Hillary come 2016. They will have to be careful. Conservatives and the GOP cannot be seen as bullying Hillary. Also Reverand Wright didn't do Obama in, Benghazi probably won't do Clinton in either. One good thing is Hillary will likely have to run to the right of Obama, and we need a conservative candidate who can eloquently, without coming across in any bullying manner, explain the flaws in all of her policies. I think she would be better than Obama though, as she is not as far-left as he is, and America won't have any appetite for more attempts at fundamentally changing America after the Ocare fiasco, provided it continues to bomb.

One thing about Hillary though is that she doesn't strike me as Presidential material. She cried in the 2008 election and complained about the Democratic party being too much of a boy's club, then at the Benghazi hearings, she blew up at the questioning; how is she going to handle the stresses of the Presidency?

When you put up with bad behavior you are giving confirmation that it is acceptable and you are encouraging it continue.

Better to change the game by putting up a good fight and taking some lumps than to put up with their crap.

[Paslode]

Originally Posted by Broadsword2004

It isn't fair, but running against a woman is always tougher. Women did not like all the negative things being done to Sarah Palin when she initially came on the scene in 2008 either. Conservatives can very much criticize Hillary and put up a good fight without being seen as bullies I think. It just requires some slickness.

I think being accused of being racist is a bit different, as there is no way to go about campaigning against a black Democrat where you really cannot be accused of such as a GOPer. But with a woman, I think there are ways where it can come off as blatantly sexist to women in particular if not careful. Remember when Tim Pawlenty in the Republican primary debate was really mean-acting towards Michelle Bachmann? That doomed his chances at the presidency because GOP women didn't like it.

The vast majority of politicking is little more than WWF Smack Down and all the participants are in on it. As long as you buy into and play along with the act it will continue to perpetuate.......unfortunately the majority of voters, like the majority of WWF fans, do appear to believe that what they are seeing is unscripted reality!

BUT it is in fact most if not all is a well rehearsed and orchestrated script of Good vs Evil, Us vs Them.


Racist and Sexist..........How many fingers am I holding up, Winston?

[Paslode]

Originally Posted by Broadsword2004

I don't buy that the political campaigns are scripted like WWF. They are both out to win. IMO, it's more like the political equivalent of Rough and Tumble, anything goes fighting.

McCain wasn't out to win, Romney didn't seem up to a fight, and if the show was truly rough and tumble it would be no holds barred and they would call a spade a spade.

IMO, the whole "What difference does it make" bit could backfire on conservatives against Hillary come 2016. They will have to be careful. Conservatives and the GOP cannot be seen as bullying Hillary. Also Reverand Wright didn't do Obama in, Benghazi probably won't do Clinton in either. One good thing is Hillary will likely have to run to the right of Obama, and we need a conservative candidate who can eloquently, without coming across in any bullying manner, explain the flaws in all of her policies.

What you described isn't anything goes fighting, it is going to a fight with a muzzle and one arm tied behind your back.....and you are playing the game by the script.