Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > At Ease > The Soapbox

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-20-2009, 08:36   #16
TrapLine
Guerrilla
 
TrapLine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: MN's Iron Range
Posts: 450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monsoon65 View Post
Obama has really helped gun ownership and ammo sales since he took office.

And people say he does nothing for the economy!
I have seen the same thing. I went to the local Cabela's last weekend to look at a handgun. The gun section was really buzzing, with long lines just to get to the counters. I have never had a handgun, other than an old .22 I carried while trapping. I guess I am one of the sheeple that are thinking it may be now or never. That said, I wish to thank everyone here for the great info on the subject. I have spent hours reading the shooting/weapons threads as I try to make the right decision while CC is still an option in this occupied state. I do not want to be of the tinfoil hat ilk, but do not want to be unprepared either.
TrapLine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2009, 00:24   #17
steel71
Guerrilla
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: florida
Posts: 192
ELENA (AP) - Montana lawmakers fired another shot in battles for states’ rights as they supported letting some Montana gun owners and dealers skip reporting their transactions to the federal government.

Under House Bill 246, firearms made in Montana and used in Montana would be exempt from federal regulation. The same would be true for firearm accessories and ammunition made and sold in the state.

“What we need here is for Montana to be able to handle Montana’s business and affairs,” Republican Rep. Joel Boniek told fellow lawmakers Saturday. The wilderness guide from Livingston defeated Republican incumbent Bruce Malcolm in last spring’s election.


Boniek’s measure aims to circumvent federal authority over interstate commerce, which is the legal basis for most gun regulation in the United States. The bill potentially could release Montanans from both federal gun registration requirements and dealership licensing rules. Since the state has no background-check laws on its own books, the legislation also could free gun purchasers from that requirement.

“Firearms are inextricably linked to the history and culture of Montana, and I’d like to support that,” Boniek said. “But I want to point out that the issue here is not about firearms. It’s about state rights.”

The House voted 64-36 for the bill on Saturday. If it clears a final vote, the measure will go to the Senate.

House Republicans were joined by 14 Democrats in passing the measure.

“I would hope that our U.S. Supreme Court would begin to retreat from what I think is an abusive interpretation of our interstate commerce clause,” said Rep. Deborah Kottel, a Democrat from Great Falls who supports the measure.

That clause in the U.S. Constitution grants Congress authority to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the states. The Supreme Court has handled cases seeking to limit the clause’s application in recent years. In 2005, the court upheld federal authority to regulate marijuana under the clause, even when its use is limited to noncommercial purposes n such as medical reasons n and it is grown and used within a state’s borders.

The Montana bill follows fears here and elsewhere that the election of Barack Obama as president will trigger more gun regulation. In the months before Obama’s inauguration, Montanans rushed to stock up on guns, pushing gun sales beyond normal benchmarks despite the recession.

Opponents of the measure worry lax regulations in the state could lead to a similar surge in both gun sales and gun manufacturing.

“Who are we bringing in and is this the kind of business we want to have in this state?” asked Rep. Sue Malek, D-Missoula. “I want our state to be recognized as a state that cares about people, and that cares about the environment.”

The bill is one of a number the Legislature is considering that may extend gun rights in Montana.

Earlier in the week, the House passed another measure, HB228, that would let Montanans carry concealed weapons in city limits without having permits.

http://www.missoulian.com/articles/2...bnews/br26.txt
steel71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2009, 07:05   #18
Knight
FTFSI
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: State of mind
Posts: 79
The news about Montana is a far cry from some of the legislation scares that are buzzing around right now. God Bless those boys and girls up there!!
A $1 million dollar insurance policy for gun owners? Are you kidding me? They are not going to take away our 2nd Amend. right; just trying to make it completely unaffordable to own a firearm. I used to reside in Montana, and am seriously thinking about going back: It's the only place that I would feel secure from all the BS right now!
__________________
"Faith sees the invisible, Believes the incredible, and Receives the impossible."
Knight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2009, 20:21   #19
The Reaper
Quiet Professional
 
The Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland
Posts: 24,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knight View Post
The news about Montana is a far cry from some of the legislation scares that are buzzing around right now. God Bless those boys and girls up there!!
A $1 million dollar insurance policy for gun owners? Are you kidding me? They are not going to take away our 2nd Amend. right; just trying to make it completely unaffordable to own a firearm. I used to reside in Montana, and am seriously thinking about going back: It's the only place that I would feel secure from all the BS right now!

Knight:

You need to read the rules and follow the instructions before posting again.

TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910

De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
The Reaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2009, 11:57   #20
Bordercop
Guerrilla
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 144
HR 45

Here's a scary one...HR 45

Here's the link so you can read it and make your own mind up...

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-45
Bordercop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2009, 16:19   #21
Razor
Quiet Professional
 
Razor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 4,533
Its scary alright, but its been referred to committee with no co-sponsors, which may indicate that no one else wants the stink of it on them. Its still probably worth a letter to your representatives, especially if they're on the Homeland Security committee.
Razor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:20.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies