Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > National Guard SF Groups > 19th Group

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-16-2008, 18:56   #16
abc_123
Quiet Professional
 
abc_123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 2,307
Quote:
Originally Posted by SPCFoster View Post
Roger that. I didnt mean to point him out, he is a really good recruiter. What I ment in that is that he just didnt know everything that he needed to tell the young soldier, not that he was doing poorly. Everyone needs help now and again. I am the only infantry recruiter on our team so I am trying to see everyones point of view on everything to make myself a better soldier, and also to learn more. I didnt mean to offend anyone and if I did I apologize. I will be sending more soldiers your way.
Are you in contact with the ARNGSF recruiting team at FT Bragg? They are just now in the process of standing up. If you need the latest info, they can help you out. PM me for more info.
__________________
The Main Thing is to keep the Main Thing the Main Thing
abc_123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2008, 09:23   #17
Defender968
SF Candidate
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SC
Posts: 811
I take it the ARNGSF recruiting team at Ft Bragg will handle recruiting across the states, as opposed to each state recruiting independently?

I'm particularly interested as I spoke to the Officer recruiter from the 20th SFG out of Alabama recently.

This leads me to a question... is it considered bad form to speak to another recruiter after I've already made contact with one from the Alabama National Guard? The Chief I spoke to answered all my questions and was very squared away and eager to help, not that I expected anything different from a QP recruiter. In any case my problem is I know that changing states later on can be difficult, and I'm about 3 hours closer to 3/20SFG(A) out of Florida or North Carolina, I contacted the 20 SFG Alabama recruiter not thinking about the way the Guard does business, with each state being independent.

If it's not a foul to do so I'll let the chief know up front, I want to make sure he doesn't think I'm trying to do anything below board, and the answers he gave me were very helpful I just want to make sure I’m making the best decision possible with as much info as possible.

Last edited by Defender968; 03-20-2008 at 09:38.
Defender968 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2008, 10:04   #18
18C4V
Quiet Professional
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by Defender968 View Post
I take it the ARNGSF recruiting team at Ft Bragg will handle recruiting across the states, as opposed to each state recruiting independently?

This leads me to a question... is it considered bad form to speak to another recruiter after I've already made contact with one from the Alabama National Guard?
It sounds like to me that the ARNGSF recruiting team is designed to recruit AD SF soldiers who are ETSing. Each NG SF Company will have thier own designated recruiter and guys who help out.

As for speaking to multiple recruiters as long as you don't make a committment or sign a contract it's allright to talk to other recruiters. Most NG SF recuiters know that it takes quite a few numbers to get one guy qualified so the recruiters don't dwell on the fact that you're talking to another recruiter.
18C4V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2008, 20:43   #19
abc_123
Quiet Professional
 
abc_123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 2,307
[QUOTE=18C4V;203385]It sounds like to me that the ARNGSF recruiting team is designed to recruit AD SF soldiers who are ETSing. Each NG SF Company will have thier own designated recruiter and guys who help out.[QUOTE]


1. Incorrect. They are to help with recruiting across the board.

2. That is what has been recommended, but dedicated recruiters at each separate unit has not been funded at this time.

The ARNGSF national recruiting team is not a formal organization. It is, at the present time, a group of hard-working "action officers/NCOs" assembled on the directive of the DCG,USASFC to work on "recruiting" issues within the ARNG SF. This is in recognition of the fact that we are not being as efficient with our recruiting efforts as we should be and to help us do better at our recruiting and retention efforts. Funding for this effort has not been programmed and is being taken out of hide at the present.

They are not intended to replace the recruiters within each state or to take sole responsibility for recruiting of REP63s or those coming off active duty. They are helping to work the bigger, longer term issues and to help with those issues that are systemic and/or that cross state borders. They are, at the present time still largely in the stage where they are defining what the issues are and recommending go-forward COAs. However, if there are issues that aren't getting addressed by recruiters within the individual states they can assist.

They do not have a fomal presence on this board as of yet, however if you have a specific issue / question for them, you can contact me via PM and i'll relay.

HTH.
__________________
The Main Thing is to keep the Main Thing the Main Thing
abc_123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 15:34.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies