Defense Secretary to Open All Combat Jobs to Women

[DIYPatriot]

Originally Posted by Brush Okie

Screw it, lets just bar males from military service. For thousands of years males have born the brunt and died in war while women sat safely at home. Its just not fair, women need to take up the slack and do all the fighting from now on. I see on TV where women are not only equal to men in fighting prowess but superior in intellect, maturity and judgement. Men can stay home, unless they identify as a woman, and women, gays transgenders and what ever other pervert freak is in voge this week can go to war and work. Fuck it, I am done. The lesbian liberals think they can do better let them have at it. In fact every female, faggot, transvestite, and dyke should do mandatory military service just like males have done in the past.

I read your post to Mrs DIY and she fully agreed. She hates what our Army is becoming. Before all this PC crap became an issue she never felt that there was a spotlight on her. Ever since it began, she and several other legit female soldiers we know have been steadily feeling the looks and hearing the comments. She has super thick skin and everyone has a limit. Guess I'm just saying that good men aren't the only ones being driven away.

[abc_123]

Originally Posted by Razor

HA-ha-ha-ha-ha-ho-ho-hee-hee-ha-ha-ha-ha!

That place is a veritable proving ground for forced gender integration. If you haven't heard, in the last year the first female CSM and Commandant (1-star) have made their place in history, and just this week RUMINT has started that the current male Dean (1-star) will retire soon and be replaced by the first female to hold the position. That means 3 of the 4 top positions will be women, and the current male Superintendent (3-star) should be retiring within the next year. I would not be surprised in the least if he is replaced by the first female Supe, making the entire command team at USMA female.

Hooray for manufactured gender integration success!

My son was going to go there to wrestle. Prospective cadets have to write essays as part of their packets. I can't remember the wording but on of the questions that they were asked to write about was full of "inclusive" PC crap. ... something like "given that the Army respects diversity ... how well do you think you could work with others more different than you..." . THat's not it exactly but I remember reading it and thinking it was bullshit. I am glad that I helped him make the right decision and not go there.

[Badger52]

Originally Posted by abc_123

I am glad that I helped him make the right decision and not go there.

That a profressional Soldier, and others who've worn the uniform in previous times, would endeavor to talk one of their children out of such a thing is one of the saddest commentaries on this completely f'd up state of affairs.

[Mills]

Originally Posted by pcfixer

Political correctness in military with women in combat or combat leader roles is very dangerous.

Fact.

So I ask, what the fuck can be done about it?

My answer, vote for Ted Cruz.

[frostfire]

Originally Posted by Brush Okie

["]Screw it, lets just bar males from military service. For thousands of years males have born the brunt and died in war while women sat safely at home. Its just not fair, women need to take up the slack and do all the fighting from now on. I see on TV where women are not only equal to men in fighting prowess but superior in intellect, maturity and judgement. Men can stay home, unless they identify as a woman, and women, gays transgenders and what ever other pervert freak is in voge this week can go to war and work. Fuck it, I am done. The lesbian liberals think they can do better let them have at it. In fact every female, faggot, transvestite, and dyke should do mandatory military service just like males have done in the past.
[/COLOR]

When I hear female in infantry, 09:17 to 10:13 comes to mind.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WK1HMpPOz28

I know, I know, we do trench warfare no more and we have gals shooting at the enemies in Afghanistan and Iraq and all over the world. Yes, firearm is the great equalizer. But guns and rifles do run out of ammo and do jam. When that happens...

I wonder if Americans are ready to see their wives, daughters, and sisters in the same scenes from Mogadishu 1993 and Fallujah 2004. Who will they point the fingers at then?

I concur with Mills

[Razor]

Originally Posted by frostfire

I know, I know, we do trench warfare no more and we have gals shooting at the enemies in Afghanistan and Iraq and all over the world.

There are more than just a few instances of guys going hand-to-hand against one or more insurgents in both Iraq and Afghanistan (e.g., Tony Pryor, Ed Byers) to save the lives of their mates, so I think your point stands on its own just fine.

[xollie316]

deleted.

[bailaviborita]

War is just for fun now. It is not deadly serious. It is in aid of social advancement, letting ourselves feel good, advancing "diversity" or whatever else you want to call it- but it isn't about killing, dying, and destruction. The "nature" of warfare has changed according to many of our generals. It is now drones, "green men", and zones of gray. You can't leave out 50% of the population if you want to win. And other slogan logic...

A guy gets through Ranger without recycling and it is considered rare- but there is no fanfare, no press stories, no greased path to a branch of his choice. Definitely not standing ovations at West Point's mess for him, panel speaking opportunities to discuss his concerns, or anything else out of the ordinary. A female who recycles multiple times- could barely get out of Benning- if she really deserved to- gets all of the aforementioned and more.

What's the message? That it doesn't matter what you do- it matters what your gender is (or any of a dozen other categories)- but definitely not the "content of your character"...

We hold up as heroes anyone who fits the pop culture image of hero- regardless of what they actually accomplished.

So- who wants in on this amazing culture? Give us a call an the US can help your country change itself into an upside down world of illogic as well.

[PSM]

John McCain Slips in Provision to Draft Women in Defense Bill

https://www.conservativereview.com/c....IV4bEkux.dpuf

OK, lets see how this plays out.

Pat

[Sohei]

Originally Posted by PSM

John McCain Slips in Provision to Draft Women in Defense Bill

https://www.conservativereview.com/c....IV4bEkux.dpuf

OK, lets see how this plays out.

Pat

Very nice! It was interesting to note that according to the article, "a majority of that body (Senate) now supports drafting women."

[sg1987]

“As the U.S. military ends its long effort to consider how to more fully integrate women into combat roles, a dichotomy has emerged between the two services likely to change the most: The Marine Corps has pressed its case publicly to keep some jobs closed, while the Army has not yet disclosed its research or preferred plans.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...quiet-on-plan/

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016...-grounded.html

Question: Is there a correlation between funding levels and the amount of push back by the USMC to social engineering, or is it simply that cuts are cuts?

[cbtengr]

Originally Posted by sg1987

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...quiet-on-plan/

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016...-grounded.html

Question: Is there a correlation between funding levels and the amount of push back by the USMC to social engineering, or is it simply that cuts are cuts?

U.S. military spending has dropped from $691 billion in 2010 to $560 billion in 2015.
That is a cut of 131 Billion, I wonder where that money went, most likely not towards paying down the deficit but more than likely towards government giveaway programs.
The gutting of our military is certainly one thing the dems excel at. And meanwhile the folks that control the purse strings sit idly by watching it happen.

[PedOncoDoc]

Originally Posted by cbtengr

U.S. military spending has dropped from $691 billion in 2010 to $560 billion in 2015.
That is a cut of 131 Billion, I wonder where that money went, most likely not towards paying down the deficit but more than likely towards government giveaway programs.
The gutting of our military is certainly one thing the dems excel at. And meanwhile the folks that control the purse strings sit idly by watching it happen.

How can they justify paying for the extra time and training needed for female candidates to compete with males?

[GratefulCitizen]

Why don't they just put the women on high doses of gear?
Have to level the playing field.

Testosterone matters.
http://ajpendo.physiology.org/content/281/6/E1172#sec-9

[abc_123]

Originally Posted by PedOncoDoc

How can they justify paying for the extra time and training needed for female candidates to compete with males?

The ends justify the means. Besides it's not their money. It's the taxpayers.


Thank you, by the way.