So Much To Do About Nothing - Politic NOT-As Usual.

[Old Dog New Trick]

Why so much to do about nothing?

The latest sanctimonious buzz is the Jarred K., set up a secure line of communication with Russsia.

I was under the impression that the POTUS has a "RED" phone with a direct secure line to the Kremlin since before Kennedy. If not to avert nuclear war to wish someone a happy birthday. I'm sure technology has changed a bit and the STU3 is no longer "RED" but come on. A super secret and a secret phone line to the Kremlin is something new?

Then there is all the hoopla over FLOTUS wearing a jacket that costs more than the average aMErican salary. Fur Christ sake her toilet is made from gold and the bathroom is worth more than most people will make in a lifetime. In fact we voted in the wealthiest business man in the history of the world to be president - he's donating his mandatory salary to charity. His shoes probably cost me a monthly wage. Media let it go she's a fashion model turned First Lady not a First Lady turned fashion model for free by liberal designers trying to earn their pedigree.

While we take a moment to memorialize and celebrate the life of President Jimmy Carter's National Security Adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski, one should not forget he was born in Warsaw (Polish-Russia) and learned Russian from a Canadian 'farmer' as a young boy while living in Canada. (No, nothing to see there. Just that we used to allow "Russians" close and personal relations to POTUS)


What major news scandal did you hear or see today that shows the hypocrisy of the Left?

Oh other than Hitlery giving a commencement speech saying people need to hear the "TRUTH!"


ETA: It's political because it's a federal judge using federal guidelines from a SCOTUS ruling afterwards, that a known murderous criminal (Lee Boyd Malvo) found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt at age 17 and sentenced to two life terms without parole for the cold blooded murder of innocents. Violates his Constitutional rights post ad hoc. While at the same the non-appropriated "Constitutional Rights" (not enumerated in the Constitution for foreigners) has been upheld by the 4th Circuit Court challenging President Trumps legal (and correct interpretation) of the Immigration and Nationality Act established by Congress and signed into law in 1952 and updated several times since then that gives the POTUS broad authority to restrict any persons or persons from a specific region from entering the United States of America for a pre-determined time or reason. Good job Courts you have your priorities ass-backwards!