There Are No "Good" or "Moderate" Supremacists

[Warrior-Mentor]

There Are No "Good" or "Moderate" Supremacists
By Jeffrey Immon
February 27, 2009

There are no "good" or "moderate" supremacists. Supremacists may employ more or less destructive tactics, but their adherence to a supremacist ideology itself is never "good" or "moderate." History has shown that supremacists consistently reject the idea that humanity has an inalienable right to equality and liberty. By definition and as shown by history, every identity-based supremacist group rejects such human rights -- including such supremacists as white supremacists, Aryan Nazi supremacists, and Islamic supremacists. Therefore, American government leaders who are responsible for equality and liberty should categorically reject such supremacist groups, nations, and adherents, right?

Yet, in the case of Islamic supremacism, our governmental leaders continue to fail in this responsibility. Moreover, it is not only just American government leaders in denial about such supremacism, but also American mainstream media, foreign policy groups, and other aspects of society have joined an army of appeasement on Islamic supremacism which threatens the very foundation of equality and liberty on which our nation exists.

In the past several weeks, we have seen American government officials calling for "reconciliation" with Islamic supremacists in Afghanistan, and listening to the counsel of those who state that America must negotiate with "reconcilable" aspects of the Islamic supremacist Taliban. We have seen American government officials alternately ignore and defend Pakistan's surrender to the Islamic supremacist Taliban in the northwest portion of Pakistan, where Pakistan has agreed to the Taliban's demand to implement Islamic supremacist Sharia law. We have heard the deafening silence by such American leaders as Pakistan Islamic supremacists denounce democracy and advocate global Islamic supremacist rule, with such Pakistani "peace" negotiators echoing the very sentiments of Al-Qaeda itself -- as Osama Bin Laden seeks "the greater state of Islam from the ocean to the ocean, Allah permitting."

We have seen the calls by Senators Kerry and Lugar for Americans to provide billions of dollars to Pakistan as a reward for such a surrender on human rights and Pakistan's recent release of an individual who sought to spread nuclear weapons technology to other Islamic supremacist nations. Moreover, we have seen American government leaders invite those who seek such surrender on Islamic supremacism to America's national capital for discussions and for entertainment of congressional leaders who support engagement with the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamic supremacist groups.

We have seen a growing pattern of new individuals added to American government foreign policy with a history of appeasement on such issues. We have seen American media spin reports on polls of global Muslims who support the Islamic supremacist objectives of Al-Qaeda promoted as Muslims opposing Al-Qaeda's "terrorist methods." We have seen America media repeatedly refer to the idea of a "good Taliban," while such media ignore the growing global crisis of Islamic supremacism in threatening human rights and lives around the world.

But the larger crisis point that continues to build is the growing gap between American government leaders and mainstream media leaders who are willing to appease supremacism and surrender on equality and liberty -- versus a growing number in the American public that are willing to defy supremacism and be responsible for equality and liberty.

With every new embarrassment, with every new outrage by such appeaser government leaders and mainstream media, those responsible for equality and liberty are becoming more determined to prove that the appeaser crowd will not represent America.

Apologist speakers are outraged that "Americans do not know the difference between Islamists, who have a clear goal of creating a national Islamic state, and terrorists who call themselves jihadists." They are outraged that we recognize that Islamic supremacists are Islamic supremacists, no matter what their tactics are. Such apologists seek those supporting freedom to surrender, saying: "the only way to win a cosmic war is to refuse to fight in one." They fail to understand that being responsible for equality and liberty is a human responsibility that doesn't end - and as we have fought supremacism before, we will continue to fight supremacism in the future. We are responsible for equality and liberty - yesterday, today, and tomorrow.
(cont)