SF troops offered monster bonuses to stay

[brewmonkey]

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...ial_operations

Looks like someone finally pulled their head out of their fourth point of contact and has come up with at least someplace to start.

I think the bonuses are a nice plus but I would like to see more in the monthly pay structure. $375 harldy seems like much and I can still some soldiers making the choice to leave. Of course these are just my thoughts so that and $4.75 will get you a cup of coffee.

[Bill Harsey]

Well earned, well deserved.

[QRQ 30]

I think this has been discussed but IMHO the good SF troops they are looking for don't need bonuses to stay. I wouldn't turn it down but I never re-enlisted for no foogin bonus -- if there was one. If soldiers with 10 years+ service are looking to get out, the problem isn't money. I speak from personal experience. I got out after 15 years and no amount of money would have changed my mind. I went in at the beginning of the VN war and my last ETS came after a period of uselessness. I guess it could be said that I didn't adapt to the peace time army. If the war had lasted three more years I would probably have re-enlisted and retired. I was offered a lot of things but the only thing I wanted was "OUT"!!

The incentives for continued employment progress from money for the newbies to training and job satisfaction and security as one progresses. It takes money sometimes to lure new recruits, but it takes more than money to retain good personnel. This is a perpetual problem in civilian life as well as military.

[QRQ 30]

Sorry to belabor the point but let me give an example. My first ETS occured in Germany and I re-enlisted to go from Signal Company to a "Line" company.
My second ETS occured in Panama and I was a SCUBA/SAR instructor and I re-enlisted.
My final ETS occured at Ft. Bragg during the post-war doldrums and I hung it up.

Ironically, since I was LA qualified and a member of the 7th I just missed the involvement in LA that may have caused me to re-enlist.

Notice I enlisted for assignments and not $$$.

[CRad]

Originally Posted by QRQ 30

IMHO the good SF troops they are looking for don't need bonuses to stay. .

In that respect you are right. For most SF guys it's not the money; it's the job. If i've read the directive right this new incentive is being offered to guys who have 19 or more years in Grp. At that point the job becomes less to them than it once was. Therefore, an incentive is a good thing.

[EX-Gold Falcon]

While somewhat off topic (though it is about special pay) How about making some changes with who actually needs to be on jump status (and thus receive jump pay) and using a portion of those funds to increase the jump pay for others?

I'm sure I'm not the first to bring up this subject. The 82nd has around 17,000 troopers (if I'm off feel free to correct this error) and from personal experience for at least 30-40% of personal, there is neither a tactical nor strategic need for them to be on jump status. While jumping is part & parcel of being in the 82nd, at the end of the day parachute drops are training. ie: Training for combat.
Therefore if a soldier is not directly assigned to either a combat arms unit or direct combat support (Riggers would be an exception), there does not exist a tactical need for them to train in a skill-set that will never be employed.
Within 5-7 years, the cost-savings from jump pay, jump school, aircraft maintenance/fuel, parachutes, reduced injuries, etc would be considerable. All forms of jump pay (static & freefall) could easily be doubled, while still spending less overall.

That is my thought, and may the debate begin!


Travis

[QRQ 30]

Travis: You have some points. OTOH it has been demonstrated that regardless of MOS, airborne troops have a certain Esperit de Corps. I remember when they had "Legs" in support of Training group (mostly spoons) we tormented the shit out of them. I think you will find that troopers will do a better job of supporting you than would Legs. Give it some serious thought and I think that youy really don't want to open that can of worms.

[EX-Gold Falcon]

Originally Posted by QRQ 30

Travis: You have some points. OTOH it has been demonstrated that regardless of MOS, airborne troops have a certain Esperit de Corps. I remember when they had "Legs" in support of Training group (mostly spoons) we tormented the shit out of them. I think you will find that troopers will do a better job of supporting you than would Legs. Give it some serious thought and I think that youy really don't want to open that can of worms.

Hmm. Yes and no. Life in a line company was pretty secular. While I came across plenty of support people on a regular basis most of the time it was not for an official reason. Combat arms tended to deal with fellow combat arms and direct combat support. It was the rare occasion when I might have to head to the "hill", the hospital, out of unit supply, etc.
While I understand your example of shooters & support esperit de corp, it still dificult to see the need for them to be on jump status when those funds could potentially be better utilized somewhere else. Kind of a expense vs return issue.

Perhaps current jump status support staff could be grandfathered in till the end of their current enlistment, and all new support soldiers would not be airborne. Help sooth the waters, so to speak.

Travis