01-24-2013, 08:30
|
#1
|
|
Area Commander
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Occupied Wokeville
Posts: 4,652
|
House Democrats propose opening gun makers to civil liability
Death by law suit..
Quote:
|
Washington, DC – Today, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) introduced legislation, The Equal Access to Justice for Victims of Gun Violence Act, to ensure that the victims of gun violence are allowed to have their day in court and that the gun industry – manufacturers, sellers and interest groups – is not shielded from liability when it acts with negligence and disregard for public safety.
|
http://schiff.house.gov/press-releas...-day-in-court/
__________________
Quote:
|
When a man dies, if nothing is written, he is soon forgotten.
|
|
|
Paslode is offline
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 08:38
|
#2
|
|
RIP Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Ozarks
Posts: 10,072
|
Can't you still sue Big Tobacco if you're stupid enough to suck smoke into your lungs long enough to die? Stands to reason.
__________________
"There you go, again." Ronald Reagan
|
|
Dusty is offline
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 08:47
|
#3
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Location, Location
Posts: 4,078
|
Maybe they should include the all politicians and anti-gun groups that enable the criminal/mentally disabled to perpetrate said violence to have Tort liability as well.
__________________
The two most powerful warriors are patience and time - Leo Tolstoy
It's Never Crowded Along the Extra Mile - Wayne Dyer
WOKE = Willfully Overlooking Known Evil
|
|
MR2 is offline
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 09:22
|
#4
|
|
Guerrilla Chief
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Near Water
Posts: 560
|
I think I hear a bit of Shakespeare "... Kill all the lawyers."
__________________
Keep a forward momentum.
|
|
Go Devil is offline
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 09:24
|
#5
|
|
Area Commander
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 4,792
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Go Devil
I think I hear a bit of Shakespeare "... Kill all the lawyers."
|
Unless you need one. 
__________________
The function of wisdom is to discriminate between good and evil.
Marcus Tullius Cicero
|
|
tonyz is offline
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 17:36
|
#6
|
|
Guerrilla Chief
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Near Water
Posts: 560
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tonyz
Unless you need one. |
I don't know why anyone would need one, if not being bothered by one.
Most matters in my lowly existence can be handled with my own actions and words.
Practicing law seems to be an industry that perpetuates it's own need by creating further laws.
__________________
Keep a forward momentum.
|
|
Go Devil is offline
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 11:31
|
#7
|
|
Area Commander
Join Date: May 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 1,644
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dusty
Can't you still sue Big Tobacco if you're stupid enough to suck smoke into your lungs long enough to die? Stands to reason.
|
I agree with the point you are getting across, in essence. Yes people know that smoking is bad for you, how can you not. From what I remember about all the lawsuits that came back and bit the cig manufacturers in the butt is that they were knowingly putting addictive components in the cigarettes so that they could, well get people addicted to them.
Maybe some of the lawyers on here can chime in on that one.
I don't think gun manufacturers (IMHO) would pass the same litmus test. How do you say a gun is an addicitive substance? But, on the other hand, anyone can sue anyone for jsut about anything these days, so who knows.
|
|
afchic is offline
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 12:36
|
#8
|
|
Bladesmith to the Quiet Professionals
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oregon, Land of the Silver Grey Sunsets
Posts: 3,886
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by afchic
I agree with the point you are getting across, in essence. Yes people know that smoking is bad for you, how can you not. From what I remember about all the lawsuits that came back and bit the cig manufacturers in the butt is that they were knowingly putting addictive components in the cigarettes so that they could, well get people addicted to them.
Maybe some of the lawyers on here can chime in on that one.
I don't think gun manufacturers (IMHO) would pass the same litmus test. How do you say a gun is an addicitive substance? But, on the other hand, anyone can sue anyone for jsut about anything these days, so who knows.
|
The cigarette companies have to sell a lot of smokes to pay off those lawsuits.
|
|
Bill Harsey is offline
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 13:14
|
#9
|
|
RIP Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Ozarks
Posts: 10,072
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by afchic
From what I remember about all the lawsuits that came back and bit the cig manufacturers in the butt
|
She who would pun would pick a pocket.
You're exactly right, though- who knows?
__________________
"There you go, again." Ronald Reagan
|
|
Dusty is offline
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 13:29
|
#10
|
|
Area Commander
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,086
|
May as well make it fair. Open every company and manufacturer to lawsuit for any misuse of their product.
Ford is now responsible for drunk driving accidents and texting while driving...
__________________
Daniel
GM1 USNR (RET)
Si vis pacem, para bellum
|
|
Streck-Fu is offline
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 14:04
|
#11
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sneaking back and forth across the Border
Posts: 6,687
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Streck-Fu
May as well make it fair. Open every company and manufacturer to lawsuit for any misuse of their product.
Ford is now responsible for drunk driving accidents and texting while driving...
|
Exactly...
If you kill someone with a knife the company gets sued, if you are convicted with vehicular homicide, etc etc etc...
|
|
SF_BHT is offline
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 14:20
|
#12
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 15,370
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Streck-Fu
Ford is now responsible for drunk driving accidents and texting while driving...
|
Not true - however under a state like Florida's strict liability standard in product liability cases they may be liable for personal injuries incurred by people using their vehicles if the vehicles have mechanical defects which contributed to those injuries even if the defect(s) were not the cause of the accident. Whether or not this holds true is yet TBD as the suit is on-going...but the local office of Dewey, Dickum, and Howe are on the case for the plaintiff. 
Richard 
__________________
“Sometimes the Bible in the hand of one man is worse than a whisky bottle in the hand of (another)… There are just some kind of men who – who’re so busy worrying about the next world they’ve never learned to live in this one, and you can look down the street and see the results.” - To Kill A Mockingbird (Atticus Finch)
“Almost any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.” - Robert Heinlein
|
|
Richard is offline
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 14:02
|
#13
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Occupied Pineland
Posts: 4,701
|
It's a logical extension of the argument.
__________________
A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.
~ Marcus Tullius Cicero (42B.C)
|
|
Peregrino is offline
|
|
|
01-25-2013, 12:41
|
#14
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 933
|
Saving a child results in potential charges for man.
When Joe Biden says "if we can save one child..." What say you now Joe?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dusty
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...-face-charges/
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...-face-charges/
D.C. police are investigating whether a man will face criminal charges for shooting a pit bull that was attacking a child in his neighborhood.
The incident unfolded Sunday afternoon, after three pit bulls attacked an 11-year-old boy as he rode his bicycle through the Brightwood neighborhood of Northwest, according to a police report.
When the man, a neighbor, saw the boy being mauled by the dogs, he went inside his home and got a gun. The man killed one of the dogs. The gunfire attracted the attention of a police officer in the area near Eighth and Sheridan streets, where the attack occurred. The officer responded and shot the other two pit bulls as they continued to attack the boy.
The police report, which did not identify any of the people involved, said the boy suffered severe lacerations. The Washington Post, which first reported the details of the shooting, quoted the boy’s uncle as saying the boy was also shot in the foot.
Metropolitan Police Department spokeswoman Gwendolyn Crump said Wednesday that the entire case, including whether the man legally owned the gun he used to kill the dog, is under investigation.
While public opinion might be supportive of the man’s actions, he could still face significant charges depending on the outcome of the investigation, criminal defense attorney Daniel Gross said.
Snip
|
Last edited by koz; 01-25-2013 at 15:29.
|
|
koz is offline
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:17.
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
