12-02-2010, 09:35
|
#1
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: 18 yrs upstate NY, 30 yrs South Florida, 20 yrs Conch Republic, now chasing G-Kids in NOVA & UK
Posts: 11,901
|
4G is a myth (and a confusing mess)
As we are in "the season", I think this article may save you a couple Sheckles..
I do understand the why's and howfor's of rolling out technology that is not ready for prime time.
It's $$$$$$$$$.
Cavity Empty... (if you can't see the bottom,, you're in over your head..)
Quote:
4G is a myth (and a confusing mess), By David Goldman, staff writer, First Published: December 1, 2010: 8:42 AM ET
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- You've seen the 4G advertisements from T-Mobile, Sprint and Verizon, bragging about a much-better wireless network with blazing fast speeds.
Here's the secret the carriers don't advertise: 4G is a myth. Like the unicorn, it hasn't been spotted anywhere in the wild just yet -- and won't be any time in the near future.
The International Telecommunication Union, the global wireless standards-setting organization, determined last month that 4G is defined as a network capable of download speeds of 100 megabits per second (Mbps). That's fast enough to download an average high-definition movie in about three minutes.
None of the new networks the carriers are rolling out meet that standard.
continued...
http://money.cnn.com/2010/12/01/tech...cnn=yes&hpt=C2
|
__________________
Go raibh tú leathuair ar Neamh sula mbeadh a fhios ag an diabhal go bhfuil tú marbh
"May you be a half hour in heaven before the devil knows you’re dead"
|
JJ_BPK is offline
|
|
12-02-2010, 09:45
|
#2
|
Auxiliary
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Mexico
Posts: 78
|
Thanks for the article, sir. Some friends of mine are going to be unhappy knowing they bought a racecar with no roads to drive on.
Not only is 4G not available, it is FAR from it. 4G is almost 10 times faster that the current expanded networks, according to that article. What they are selling is misleading: They could have called it 3.5G, 3G+, 3G++, anything....
....but instead, they opt to pretend they have technology they don't, and might even vanish the 4G term. Ouch.
|
CombatMuffin is offline
|
|
12-02-2010, 09:53
|
#3
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: 18 yrs upstate NY, 30 yrs South Florida, 20 yrs Conch Republic, now chasing G-Kids in NOVA & UK
Posts: 11,901
|
You need a lawyer,, but they are selling 4G (large) phones,, with a lot/little PR about "their" 4g (small) networks..
I am sure that if you bring out the 10X eye loop, you will see that they do not guarantee the 4G network availability,
but when they have sole a bazillion 4G phones they will be able to afford to up-grade to a 4G network..
__________________
Go raibh tú leathuair ar Neamh sula mbeadh a fhios ag an diabhal go bhfuil tú marbh
"May you be a half hour in heaven before the devil knows you’re dead"
|
JJ_BPK is offline
|
|
12-02-2010, 09:54
|
#4
|
Area Commander
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 4,478
|
Sprint and 4G
IME, Sprint is especially misleading when it comes to 4G. As early as 2004, they've been saying "Our 4G network is in testing in select cities and we intend to expand it next fall." Six years later....
Moreover, early reports that 4G devices and plans would cost less than 3G products and services have proven unfounded.
|
Sigaba is offline
|
|
12-02-2010, 10:57
|
#5
|
Guerrilla
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 356
|
It's important to add that AT&T has HSPA+ deployed to much of its coverage areas. But unlike T-Mobile, it doesn't call its HSPA+ implementation "4G".
As far as the "next generation", I think Verizon Wireless is the closest. They flip on their first LTE transceivers (mostly in major metros and airports) on 12/5. LTE is truly next generation. It's a big step towards LTE Advanced, which should formally fall under the "4G" guidelines.
|
perdurabo is offline
|
|
12-02-2010, 11:26
|
#6
|
SF Candidate
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Emerald Coast
Posts: 32
|
Another little fun factoid is Sprint mandates a extra 10$ monthly charge for 4g. No matter if you have 4g coverage in your city or not. Simply just because you have a 4g capable device. IMO the only people who will actually fulfill promises in a timely manner will be Verizon. They consistently sink the most money in there network year after year.
__________________
"Whom shall I send? And who will go for us?" And I said, "Here am I. Send me!"
|
RockSolid is offline
|
|
12-02-2010, 16:16
|
#7
|
Guerrilla
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Murrieta, Ca
Posts: 316
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by perdurabo
It's important to add that AT&T has HSPA+ deployed to much of its coverage areas. But unlike T-Mobile, it doesn't call its HSPA+ implementation "4G".
As far as the "next generation", I think Verizon Wireless is the closest. They flip on their first LTE transceivers (mostly in major metros and airports) on 12/5. LTE is truly next generation. It's a big step towards LTE Advanced, which should formally fall under the "4G" guidelines.
|
AT&T Mobility has stated that they intend to upgrade to LTE as their 4G technology in 2011, but will introduce HSUPA and HSPA+ as bridge standards.
http://web.archive.org/web/200806101...017502859.html
My money is still on AT&T. It will be interesting to see the data storm on the Verizon network when the Verizon iPhone comes out in 2011. Buy stock in Verizon?
__________________
“Try not to become a man of success but rather try to become a man of value.”
–Albert Einstein
|
spherojon is offline
|
|
12-02-2010, 17:45
|
#8
|
Guerrilla
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 356
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spherojon
It will be interesting to see the data storm on the Verizon network when the Verizon iPhone comes out in 2011. Buy stock in Verizon?
|
Agreed. I think Verizon will be getting a serious wake up call. AT&T put serious efforts into upgrading its network to handle the additional load.
|
perdurabo is offline
|
|
12-02-2010, 17:09
|
#9
|
Guerrilla Chief
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ft Benning
Posts: 707
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by perdurabo
As far as the "next generation", I think Verizon Wireless is the closest. They flip on their first LTE transceivers (mostly in major metros and airports) on 12/5. LTE is truly next generation. It's a big step towards LTE Advanced, which should formally fall under the "4G" guidelines.
|
Verizon 4G cities map that includes WDC and Baltimore. Very nice. The news just announced that the entire Verizon network will be upgraded by 2013.
__________________
"I see that you notice that I wear glasses. Well, it was to be. I've not only grown old and gray, I've become almost blind in the service of my country." - General George Washington
"There are times in your life you'll be required to perform an exceedingly difficult task to the best of your ability, regardless of your perceived capability. Mental toughness is what will carry the day during these times. In other words, you suck it up and do what you have to do." - Razor
|
lindy is offline
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 23:07.
|
|
|