Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > At Ease > The Early Bird

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-05-2008, 23:32   #1
GratefulCitizen
Area Commander
 
GratefulCitizen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Page/Lake Powell, Arizona
Posts: 3,402
National parks concealed carry

Score one for the 2nd.

http://townhall.com/news/us/2008/12/...national_parks
__________________
__________________
Waiting for the perfect moment is a fruitless endeavor.
Make a decision, and then make it the right one through your actions.
"Whoever watches the wind will not plant; whoever looks at the clouds will not reap." -Ecclesiastes 11:4 (NIV)
GratefulCitizen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2008, 02:50   #2
greenberetTFS
Quiet Professional (RIP)
 
greenberetTFS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Carriere,Ms.
Posts: 6,922
Quote:
Originally Posted by GratefulCitizen View Post
GC,

Thats great news,finally we get a break. However BHO will kill it, I'm afraid once he gets in office. We know his feelings on guns...........

GB TFS
__________________
I believe that SF is a 'calling' - not too different from the calling missionaries I know received. I knew instantly that it was for me, and that I would do all I could to achieve it. Most others I know in SF experienced something similar. If, as you say, you HAVE searched and read, and you do not KNOW if this is the path for you --- it is not....
Zonie Diver

SF is a calling and it requires commitment and dedication that the uninitiated will never understand......
Jack Moroney

SFA M-2527, Chapter XXXVII
greenberetTFS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2008, 10:17   #3
kgoerz
Quiet Professional
 
kgoerz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NC for now
Posts: 2,418
Was this an Executive Order that can be rescinded by BHO as soon as he takes office. If so you have to wonder if the Bush Administration is going to pass a few more like this. Forcing BHO to show his true Liberal colors when he takes office. Sounds like something old Carl Rove would do
__________________
Sounds like a s#*t sandwhich, but I'll fight anyone, I'm in.
kgoerz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2008, 10:56   #4
Defender968
SF Candidate
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SC
Posts: 811
Finally, it's made no sense to not allow law abiding citizens to carry in parks, it just kills me that you have idiots like Bill Wade who clearly haven't got a clue fighting it. I'm sure the only public he is speaking of are his tree hugging no bath taking pinko hippy freaks.

Quote:
"Once again, political leaders in the Bush administration have ignored the preferences of the American public by succumbing to political pressure, in this case generated by the National Rifle Association," said Bill Wade, president of the Coalition of National Park Service Retirees.

"This regulation will put visitors, employees and precious resources of the National Park System at risk. We will do everything possible to overturn it and return to a commonsense approach to guns in national parks that has been working for decades,"
I do agree that B0 will likely overturn this immediately upon being sworn in, though I do hope Pres Bush puts a few more pro 2nd amendment presidential orders out, so the rest of the country who hasn't been paying attention will have tangible proof that B0 is anti 2nd amendment.
Defender968 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2008, 11:49   #5
ksgbobo
Guerrilla
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Jacksonville Florida
Posts: 109
That is nice to know, because there are a group of people that live in the Osceola National Park here in Florida, and like to wreck havoc every once in awhile on people visting the park.
I never understood the reasoning for not allowing a person to carry in a park. You are far from help from any kind of attack, be it two legged or four legged.
__________________
Be a Leader...Not a Follower

We want great men who, when fortune frowns, will not be discouraged.
~Colonel Henry Knox
ksgbobo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2008, 12:28   #6
GratefulCitizen
Area Commander
 
GratefulCitizen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Page/Lake Powell, Arizona
Posts: 3,402
Quote:
Originally Posted by kgoerz View Post
Was this an Executive Order that can be rescinded by BHO as soon as he takes office. If so you have to wonder if the Bush Administration is going to pass a few more like this. Forcing BHO to show his true Liberal colors when he takes office. Sounds like something old Carl Rove would do
I believe it was a "rules change" by the normal method.

Several weeks ago there was an article written by a liberal that bemoaned how difficult it (and others) would be to reverse because of the method by which they were changed.

Hoping the lib was right on that point.

<edit>

Here's something that addresses the difficulty in reversing the rules change:
http://www.ombwatch.org/article/articleview/4400/
__________________
__________________
Waiting for the perfect moment is a fruitless endeavor.
Make a decision, and then make it the right one through your actions.
"Whoever watches the wind will not plant; whoever looks at the clouds will not reap." -Ecclesiastes 11:4 (NIV)

Last edited by GratefulCitizen; 12-06-2008 at 12:43. Reason: added info
GratefulCitizen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2008, 13:10   #7
Sten
Guerrilla Chief
 
Sten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 695
From http://www.doi.gov/news/08_News_Releases/120508.html

We do have some support in Washington.

Quote:
On February 22, 2008, Interior Secretary Kempthorne responded to letters from 51 Senators, both Democrats and Republicans, as well as from the Chairman and Ranking Member of the House Natural Resources Committee, urging him to update existing regulations that prohibit the carrying of firearms in national parks and wildlife refuges. In his response, the Secretary directed Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks Lyle Laverty “to develop and propose for public comment by April 30 Federal regulations that will update firearms policies on these lands to reflect existing Federal laws (such as those prohibiting weapons in Federal buildings) and the laws by which the host states govern transporting and carrying of firearms on their analogous public lands.”
Sten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2008, 10:30   #8
TOMAHAWK9521
Quiet Professional
 
TOMAHAWK9521's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,208
Carry a sidearm in the national parks out here in the Rockies can definitely mean the difference between life and death. Mountain lions have become a lot bolder around people. Off the top of my head and can think of at least 3 instances here in CO where a child was attacked and killed within eyesight (less than 50m) from the parents. The cats don't just happen along and see something easy to kill. They stalk their quarry and wait for the best chance to strike. People who come to visit Rocky Mtn Ntl Park or Mesa Verde have no idea about the very real threat from wildlife. Granted, this isn't Alaska but folks must remember that when you go out into the high country in CO, you are entering the food chain.
__________________
"It is a brave act of valor to condemn death, but where life is more terrible than death, it is then the truest valor to dare to live." -Sir Thomas Browne (1605-1682)
TOMAHAWK9521 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:57.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies