Did Barry order the deaths of Clancy and Breitbart

[Sdiver]

Tin foil hat time ..... or is it ????

When the story broke about Clancy's death, I was curious as to way the "cause" wasn't listed. He was only 66 and in fairly good health. Now I'm not saying Barry took a page from Bill and Hillary's play book, but with the many scandals Barry is facing, I have a feeling we might see more and more "mysterious" deaths.

BOMBSHELL: Ex-CIA Agent Claims Obama Killed Breitbart and Clancy

Brandon Walker- Doctor Jim Garrow, philanthropist and worker for one of the largest non-profit organizations on the planet to save female children from slaughter in China. He has been featured on several media outlets throughout the world. Last Sunday, as a guest of Now the End Begins internet radio program however, he dropped a bombshell on the world. Dr. Garrow claims that up to a week ago he was covert CIA. To top it off on the program, he states he knows that President Obama ordered the hits that killed Tom Clancy and Andrew Breitbart!

According to Garrow … Andrew Breitbart died under mysterious circumstances. The autopsy said that he died with no prescription drugs in his system and only a .04 blood alcohol content not days after taping an interview with the now also deceased “alleged” gay lover of President Barack H. Obama. So why if he died of natural causes did the FBI go after his widow for potential homicide?

Well according to Dr. Jim Garrow, Andrew Breitbart was not dead of natural causes. According to the interview, he was killed directly by the Obama Administration. Andrew Breitbart was known for his controversy against the administration and the news media. Several people believed he was killed including some of the main founders of www.breitbart.com in his memory.

Then there was Tom Clancy. Tom Clancy died last week at the age of 66. Although they say “natural causes”, the actual list of cause of death on his autopsy, cause of death unknown.

Tom Clancy once said:

I hang my hat on getting as many things right as I can. I’ve made up stuff that’s turned out to be real — that’s the spooky part.”-Tom Clancy to the New York Times

It is no secret when he wrote The Hunt for the Red October that he was met at the door by Pentagon officials and FBI agents demanding to know where he got top-secret documents. Dr. Garrow states that after the incident, the CIA “spoon fed” him classified information and scenarios to write his novels in a manner that was entertaining but contained that ever needed element of truth. Dr. Garrow says that is why he was killed because he was getting to close to a secret they don’t want the world to know. In fact Dr. Garrow attributes the statement quoted above as “a little too late”.

Dr. Garrow states President Obama had Tom Clancy killed as well and noted that it takes 5 days for plant toxins and most poisons to break down and leave no traces in the human body. Amazingly enough, or coincidentally, the doctors did not perform an autopsy on Tom Clancy’s body for 5 days.

Finally he revealed a revelation so shocking to the radio program that can be best described in their own words:

Lastly, he revealed that Obama’s administration was made up of Marxist Muslims who all take their orders from Senior Adviser to the President, Iranian-born Valerie Jarrett. Dr. Garrow said that it is well known to intelligence agencies all over the world that Obama is a foreign plant who was placed on the path to the presidency by ultra-rich Saudi nationals This is why, Garrow said, that all of Obama’s education records have been permanently sealed.- Now The End Begins

http://www.conservativeinfidel.com/u...rt-and-clancy/

[Paslode]

If O ever decides to leave the WH we may find out there was substance in the conspiracies.

[Richard]

YGBSM.

Richard

[Paslode]

Originally Posted by Richard

YGBSM.

Richard

Stranger things have happened.

[PSM]

Andrew Breitbart had dinner with Bill Ayres and friends shortly before he died.

Pat

[Leozinho]

When you guys decide to link and reprint these articles, do you ever ask yourself where the proof is?

This "Dr" Garrow makes shocking claims and offers zero proof. How does he know? If he knows it, why doesn't he provide the proof that would make people take notice?

If you think that senior officials decided to leak this bombshell to him to expose it, do you ask why him and not the NY Times, or WashPo, or Drudge, or at least someone without a fake doctorate?

[Knight]

With everything that is transpiring out there, who knows what to believe. The brainwashing by the administration and the MSM has everyone who gives a damn corkscrewing on what the truth is. I lean on the side that people are definitely being disposed of because they know too much, or they are gaining a strong following on what they report, and a lot of it has evidence of not being conspiracy. All I really know is that the government has always proven, that killing many is a small, impersonal feat for them-even their own. So what is the big deal with one? And there are plenty of ways to cover it up-especially when you have control of the media. There are a lot more professional organizations and businesses, who are not directly tied to the government, that are starting to question just WTH is going on, and that is nice to see. In the midst of all of this, I'm betting a lot more "heart attacks", "suicides", and "natural causes" are on the horizon. And be prepared, just in case.

[Leozinho]

You missed my point. I'm not asking if you or anyone else thinks the government does nefarious things.

I'm asking why post articles ]in which a phony 'doctor' with a history of making outrageous claims and providing zero evidence (google "Garrow Litmus test") makes another outrageous claim and provides zero evidence.

Just because some believe the government does nefarious things doesn't mean you should post complete shite that a 12 year old can easily dismiss with some simple critical thinking and a google search.

[Sdiver]

Okay, I guess from now on I will only post stories of the "nefarious goings on" by our government from reputable sources ... ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CBS, CNN, FOX, NYT, LA Times, etc.

Looks like it's back to the Comedy Threads for me.

[Dusty]

Originally Posted by Sdiver

Okay, I guess from now on I will only post stories of the "nefarious goings on" by our government from reputable sources ... ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CBS, CNN, FOX, NYT, LA Times, etc.

Looks like it's back to the Comedy Threads for me.

lol Don't go away mad, Sdiver!

In fact, don't go anywhere at all. IMO, you're a valuable contributor to this forum, and I enjoy your posts.

Surely you know they're going to be screened and scrutinized; this thread just happens to be a tad outerlimitsesque.

Maybe more than a tad.

[Paslode]

Originally Posted by Dusty

lol Don't go away mad, Sdiver!

In fact, don't go anywhere at all. IMO, you're a valuable contributor to this forum, and I enjoy your posts.

Surely you know they're going to be screened and scrutinized; this thread just happens to be a tad outerlimitsesque.

Maybe more than a tad.

Yes and no. There is some evidence, in print, that leads some to believe Garrows claim of a Muslim/Jarrett connection that put the O in office.

http://patdollard.com/2012/09/obama-...-s-presidency/

[Leozinho]

I'm not a moderator and I'm not telling you where to post. You can do what you want unless a moderator tells you differently.

But if you want to apply a little critical thinking yourself and do a little research before linking to something, I won't mind.

I'm assuming you didn't do that this time since you got butthurt and didn't answer my questions.

[Sdiver]

Oh hell, I'm not mad, nor am I pissed. Takes a lot to piss me off (case in point Barry's administration) and I understand exactly where Leozinho is coming from.

It is difficult to initially separate credible reporting/fact from the "tin foil hat" style we're seeing more and more today, without researching it even just a bit. But the thing that's got me is that these "credible news sources" are just as guilty of putting out false/crazy stories as the tin foil hat crowd does. In fact, I would hold them liable for the mess we're in today with Barry and his administration. If one, just one credible news source would dig into Barry's past as they have done so before in the past with other President's (both D and R) I'm sure that people would shit their pants.

BuuuuuuuUUUUUuuuuuT NooooOOOOOooooo ....... you dig into Barry's past, or bring up something sensational such as the above posted link and you're labeled a kook and deserve a room at the laughing academy. If that be the case, I hope I get a room with a window.


Ahhhhhhhh .... Juicy Fruit.

[Dusty]

Ninety-Nine Point Nine Percent Dead

Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh this afternoon was rushed to Ceasar Memorial Hospital by his bodyguards in a black General Motors Cadillac Escalade complaining of stomach pains, headache and a general malaise. Speaking with difficulty, he whispered “Bad Choom…” to his wife while being transported to the ER on a huge gurney.

Rake Armstrong, Limbaugh’s Chief of Security, reported to detectives that a slender, metro sexual, light-skinned African-American was seen fleeing Limbaugh’s prostrate body on a bicycle. The suspect was wearing a girl’s helmet, and was last spotted leaving the golf course just east of the seventh putting green.

The Surgeon on duty at the hospital told this reporter that the prognosis was “good” for Mr. Limbaugh, but that his abdomen had to be perforated to release an abnormal quantity of gas.

www.limbaughsatirelottalaughs.com

[Leozinho]

Originally Posted by Paslode

Yes and no. There is some evidence, in print, that leads some to believe Garrows claim of a Muslim/Jarrett connection that put the O in office.

http://patdollard.com/2012/09/obama-...-s-presidency/

In that case, Garrows wouldn't even be breaking the story, but instead just repeating what others have already alleged? (There's no mention of Garrows in the article above.) Relevant, since one of my points is that if someone was sitting on information that Obama had Breitbart and Clancy murdered that person wouldn't use Garrows to break the news to the public.

What about this claim by Garrow?

I have just been informed by a former senior military leader that Obama is using a new "litmus test" in determining who will stay and who must go in his military leaders. Get ready to explode folks. "The new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they will fire on US citizens or not". Those who will not are being removed.
- Dr. Jim Garrow - January 21, 2013

https://www.facebook.com/jim.garrow....51209214442015

'Cause when Lt. Gen (ret) Boykin wants to anonymously drop this bombshell on the world, he chooses to tell it to a fake doctor from Canada and have him announce it on facebook.

There are plenty of officers here. Maybe one that was purged can confirm this. <rolls eyes> Oh wait, it's utter BS too.