08-06-2010, 12:11
|
#1
|
SF Candidate
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New Orleans, La
Posts: 7
|
ICL surgery
Good morning gents. I recently found out that I am not a viable candidate for PRK eye surgery because of corneal thickness. However, I did get the go ahead to get another type of corrective eye surgery. This one involves inserting an implantable lens behind the iris. While not an absolute necessity, getting my vision fixed has been a personal goal of mine for quite some time now. And now that Uncle Sam is willing to foot the bill, you could say I'm chomping at the bit.
The problem here is attending selection. I chose PRK because I know that it is an approved procedure through SOCOM. The doctor that told me about ICL could not give a solid yes or no on the approval of this surgery. I have not yet had a chance to speak with anyone with 10th grp (SOCOM training holiday), but plan to on Monday. I was checking here in hopes that someone would have some experience or knowledge of this procedure and its "legalities" amongst SOCOM. Thank you for your time gentlemen.
Chris
|
chilpyl is offline
|
|
08-07-2010, 05:30
|
#2
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: West of Bragg...a few months out of the year
Posts: 264
|
I am pretty sure current literature is still PRK or LASEK, not LASIK. I would not think ICL' would be on the list. Anything implantable is subject to become explanted. But check with the SF recruiter closest to you, I assume on Carson
|
11Ber is offline
|
|
08-07-2010, 12:01
|
#3
|
SF Candidate
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New Orleans, La
Posts: 7
|
Thank you, I called the recruiters office yesterday and the recruiters weren't in the office, but their SPC was. He was the one that recommended that I speak with someone at group.
|
chilpyl is offline
|
|
08-07-2010, 12:12
|
#4
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland
Posts: 24,804
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chilpyl
Thank you, I called the recruiters office yesterday and the recruiters weren't in the office, but their SPC was. He was the one that recommended that I speak with someone at group.
|
I would stop collecting opinions from anonymous people on the internet and focus on getting a definitive answer from a military physician who knows the current policies.
What difference does an additional day or week make?
TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910
De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
|
The Reaper is offline
|
|
01-31-2012, 09:31
|
#5
|
Asset
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ft. Hood
Posts: 0
|
As far as ICl, you can attend SFAS and the Q. I went to selection with a soldier who had recently gone through the surgery. He had no hitches getting into selection or slotting a class date for the Q.
Last edited by medic41; 01-31-2012 at 09:34.
|
medic41 is offline
|
|
02-03-2012, 09:39
|
#6
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tampa
Posts: 2,519
|
THE ANSWER
Quote:
Originally Posted by medic41
As far as ICl, you can attend SFAS and the Q. I went to selection with a soldier who had recently gone through the surgery. He had no hitches getting into selection or slotting a class date for the Q.
|
This is from the medical authority who makes the decisions...
Quote:
MAJ K,
ICL's require a waiver. Must have demonstrated stable visual acuity 6 months post-op. No short-cuts on time frame. The issue I see with ICL's is many have pre-operative refractions that are greater than +/- 8.0 diopters, and regardless of the surgery, and how good they see now, they won't get a waiver. Waiver request must include pre-op refraction.
The reason is high diopter refraction leads to substantially increased risk of retinal detachment - which for an SF Soldier, far from the flagpole and western medical standard of care (access to an opthalmolgist who can quickly intervene and prevent blindness in that eye) is problematic.
Thanks,
RL
|
__________________
Primum non Nocere
"I have hung out in dangerous places a lot over the years, from combat zones to biker bars, and it is the weak, the unaware, or those looking for it, that usually find trouble.
Ain't no one getting out of this world alive. All you can do is try to have some choice in the way you go. Prepare yourself (and your affairs), and when your number is up, die on your feet fighting rather than on your knees. And make the SOBs pay dearly."
The Reaper-3 Sep 04
|
Eagle5US is offline
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 19:00.
|
|
|