Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > Technical FAQ Forum > Technology News and Reviews

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-07-2010, 10:04   #1
Richard
Quiet Professional
 
Richard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 15,370
Next Generation Fighter Aircraft Concept?

Something to consider for the next generation of fighter aircraft?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_mhE1_dnq8&NR=1

Richard
__________________
“Sometimes the Bible in the hand of one man is worse than a whisky bottle in the hand of (another)… There are just some kind of men who – who’re so busy worrying about the next world they’ve never learned to live in this one, and you can look down the street and see the results.” - To Kill A Mockingbird (Atticus Finch)

“Almost any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.” - Robert Heinlein
Richard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2010, 18:44   #2
Richard
Quiet Professional
 
Richard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 15,370
Quote:
I don't get it
Producing a full-scale aircraft with that level of maneuverability...

Richard
__________________
“Sometimes the Bible in the hand of one man is worse than a whisky bottle in the hand of (another)… There are just some kind of men who – who’re so busy worrying about the next world they’ve never learned to live in this one, and you can look down the street and see the results.” - To Kill A Mockingbird (Atticus Finch)

“Almost any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.” - Robert Heinlein
Richard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2010, 19:13   #3
PSM
Area Commander
 
PSM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cochise Co., AZ
Posts: 6,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard View Post
Producing a full-scale aircraft with that level of maneuverability...

Richard
Thrust-to-weight=ain't going to happen.

Pat
__________________
"Hector Lives!"

"The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress." -- Frederick Douglass

"The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen." -- Dennis Prager

"The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false-face for the urge to rule it." --H.L. Mencken
PSM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2010, 19:22   #4
dr. mabuse
Guerrilla Chief
 
dr. mabuse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: DFW area
Posts: 861
Super light, lots of flap angle ( 90 deg? ), hangs off the prop nicely. I thought he was going to hover like a helicopter when going straight up.

Not quite a UV-20A but....
__________________
"The difference is that back then, we had the intestinal fortitude to do what we needed to in order to preserve our territorial sovereignty and to protect the citizens of this great country, and today, we do not." TR

"I attribute the little I know to my not having been ashamed to ask for information, and to my rule of conversing with all descriptions of men on those topics that form their own peculiar professions and pursuits." John Locke
dr. mabuse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2010, 19:32   #5
PSM
Area Commander
 
PSM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cochise Co., AZ
Posts: 6,204
Also, modern fighters fight BVR; no more dogfights. Only 3rd World countries would need this maneuverability and who could train the pilots? Sean?

Pat
__________________
"Hector Lives!"

"The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress." -- Frederick Douglass

"The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen." -- Dennis Prager

"The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false-face for the urge to rule it." --H.L. Mencken

Last edited by PSM; 10-08-2010 at 09:14.
PSM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2010, 20:23   #6
Richard
Quiet Professional
 
Richard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 15,370
Quote:
Also, modern fighters fight BVR; no more dogfights. Only 3rd Wold countries would need this maneuverability...
If that's the case, why are we developing the F-35?

Richard
__________________
“Sometimes the Bible in the hand of one man is worse than a whisky bottle in the hand of (another)… There are just some kind of men who – who’re so busy worrying about the next world they’ve never learned to live in this one, and you can look down the street and see the results.” - To Kill A Mockingbird (Atticus Finch)

“Almost any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.” - Robert Heinlein
Richard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2010, 20:25   #7
PSM
Area Commander
 
PSM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cochise Co., AZ
Posts: 6,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard View Post
If that's the case, why are we developing the F-35?

Richard
Exactamente!

Pat

ETA: On further reflection, are you suggesting that we are developing the F-35 solely for our allied/client states that rotate within visual range of the enemy?
__________________
"Hector Lives!"

"The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress." -- Frederick Douglass

"The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen." -- Dennis Prager

"The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false-face for the urge to rule it." --H.L. Mencken

Last edited by PSM; 10-07-2010 at 21:18. Reason: as stated.
PSM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2010, 07:53   #8
The Reaper
Quiet Professional
 
The Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland
Posts: 24,820
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard View Post
If that's the case, why are we developing the F-35?

Richard
Stealthy CAS platform, in a fighter-led service, IMHO.

TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910

De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
The Reaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2010, 15:42   #9
SouthernDZ
Quiet Professional
 
SouthernDZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 656
Quote:
They thought the same thing during I think Vietnam when they took the machine guns off the fighter planes because modern fighters supposedly only fought with missiles. Broadsword2004

I was going to say the same thing. During the 1970s There was a mad scramble to outfit the F-4 Phantom with guns; a removable machine gun pod under the fuselage was what they finally came up with. I was reminded of this when I attended a SWCS instructor offsite with GEN Boykin chairing. They were looking for an alternative to Robin Sage because, "We're never going to conduct UW - we might need to design a FID exercise." less than 20 months later we were operating with the Northern Alliance.
SouthernDZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2010, 16:23   #10
akv
Area Commander
 
akv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA-Germany
Posts: 1,574
Murphy Lives

Technology is great, but this reminded me of some of the late Col. Boyd's writing on guns and fighters, the general gist IIRC,

ROE and logistics possibly factor in as well, In Gulf of Sidra type confrontations long range air to air missile capability doesn't matter much if US pilots aren't allowed to fire first, and the enemy with guns but less technology waits inside missile range, or if a month into a large conventional air war both sides have used up the available supply of air to air missiles, it falls back to guns until replenished.
__________________
"Men Wanted: for Hazardous Journey. Small wages, bitter cold, long months of complete darkness, constant danger, safe return doubtful. Honour and recognition in case of success.” -Sir Ernest Shackleton

“A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in.” –Greek proverb
akv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2010, 17:16   #11
Green Light
Quiet Professional
 
Green Light's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Eastern Panhandle, WV
Posts: 719
Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthernDZ View Post
I was going to say the same thing. During the 1970s There was a mad scramble to outfit the F-4 Phantom with guns; a removable machine gun pod under the fuselage was what they finally came up with. I was reminded of this when I attended a SWCS instructor offsite with GEN Boykin chairing. They were looking for an alternative to Robin Sage because, "We're never going to conduct UW - we might need to design a FID exercise." less than 20 months later we were operating with the Northern Alliance.
You're right, Mike. The F-4 didn't have guns at first. The Sparrow missiles for long range intercepts had about a 50%+ failure rate so they'd fire two at once to cover their bets. Still, more times than not, the missile would end up in some rice paddy. The sidewinders were good up close, but they couldn't be used against ground clutter and into the sun. There was nothing else when those were gone.

The no-gun design had its roots in the 1950s. The F-102 had only missiles and the F-106 (originally F-102B) had a Genie missile in the center bay. It was unguided: The pilot would point the aircraft into the general area of the formation of bombers, launch, and beat feet in the opposite direction. The warhead was a nuke. This bowling ball tactic was centered on the thinking at the time that large enemy bomber formations could be engaged from a distance and there would be no more dogfights. The NV Air Force, aided by Soviet pilots proved that wrong.

The F-4E had a nose-mounted Gatling gun. It was heralded as a huge step forward, except for the pilots who knew from the beginning that the doctrine from which the F-4 was originally designed.

Gen Boykin, not exactly a visionary, had the same line of thinking when he was looking for a removal of UW from the SF quiver. That's what happens when non-SF types command SF units and schools. The short-sighted are usually proven wrong, usually sooner than later.

(Richard - thanks for the cool video.)
__________________
"If we lose freedom here, there's no place to escape to. This is the last stand on earth."
RWR

"If it neither breaks my leg nor picks my pocket, what difference does it make to me?"
TJ
Green Light is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2010, 19:33   #12
PSM
Area Commander
 
PSM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cochise Co., AZ
Posts: 6,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by Broadsword2004 View Post
I think for a UAV this could be good.



They thought the same thing during I think Vietnam when they took the machine guns off the fighter planes because modern fighters supposedly only fought with missiles.
I wouldn't remove guns because they are rarely needed anymore than I'd remove ejection seats for the same reason. I'm just saying that the technology and training for such a maneuverable a/c is not needed.

BTW, don't give the AF any new useless and expensive ideas.

Pat
__________________
"Hector Lives!"

"The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress." -- Frederick Douglass

"The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen." -- Dennis Prager

"The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false-face for the urge to rule it." --H.L. Mencken
PSM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2010, 20:22   #13
wet dog
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Wow!

Some day in the not too distant future, flying a RC aircraft will be a Soldier Level I Basic Combat Task.

I'm going back to reading old threads.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2010, 21:19   #14
219seminole
Guerrilla
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Just west of the beltway.
Posts: 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by PSM View Post
Also, modern fighters fight BVR; no more dogfights. Only 3rd World countries would need this maneuverability and who could train the pilots? Sean?

Pat
This sort of thinking led USAF generals to omit guns from the F4. MiGs with guns over North Vietnam changed that thinking.
219seminole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2010, 22:09   #15
PSM
Area Commander
 
PSM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cochise Co., AZ
Posts: 6,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by 219seminole View Post
This sort of thinking led USAF generals to omit guns from the F4. MiGs with guns over North Vietnam changed that thinking.
Oh, you Air Force guys! You really should read the whole thread first.

Also, how many years ago was that? I was 18 at the time.

Pat
__________________
"Hector Lives!"

"The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress." -- Frederick Douglass

"The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen." -- Dennis Prager

"The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false-face for the urge to rule it." --H.L. Mencken
PSM is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 15:31.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies