White House Loses Bid to Exclude Fox News From Pay Czar Interview

[Team Sergeant]

IT HAS BEGUN, STRIKE ONE.



White House Loses Bid to Exclude Fox News From Pay Czar Interview

The Obama administration on Thursday tried to make "pay czar" Kenneth Feinberg available for interviews to every member of the White House pool except Fox News. But the Washington bureau chiefs of the five TV networks decided that none of their reporters would interview Feinberg unless Fox News was included.

FOXNews.com

Friday, October 23, 2009

The Obama administration on Thursday failed in its attempt to manipulate other news networks into isolating and excluding Fox News, as Republicans on Capitol Hill stepped up their criticism of the hardball tactics employed by the White House.

The Obama administration on Thursday tried to make "pay czar" Kenneth Feinberg available for interviews to every member of the White House pool except Fox News. The pool is the five-network rotation that for decades has shared the costs and duties of daily coverage of the presidency.

But the Washington bureau chiefs of the five TV networks consulted and decided that none of their reporters would interview Feinberg unless Fox News was included.

The administration relented, making Feinberg available for all five pool members and Bloomberg TV.

The pushback came after White House senior adviser David Axelrod told ABC News' "This Week" on Sunday that Fox News is not a real news organization and other news networks "ought not to treat them that way."

Media analysts cheered the decision to boycott the Feinberg interview unless Fox News was included, saying the administration's gambit was taking its feud with Fox News too far. President Obama has already declined to go on "Fox News Sunday," even while appearing on the other Sunday shows.

"I'm really cheered by the other members saying "No, if Fox can't be part of it, we won't be part of it,'" said Baltimore Sun TV critic David Zurawik, calling the move to limit Feinberg's availability "outrageous."

"What it's really about to me is the Executive Branch of the government trying to tell the press how it should behave. I mean, this democracy -- we know this -- only works with a free and unfettered press to provide information," he said.

Fox News legal analyst Peter Johnson Jr. said the administration was potentially in violation of the Constitution with its attempt to restrict access to the "eyes and ears" of the country.

"What was averted was a very serious constitutional violation by the White House," Johnson said. "There cannot be selective and arbitrary access to the White House based on some subjective determination."

Several top White House advisers have appeared on other news channels to criticize Fox News' coverage of the administration, dismiss the network as the mouthpiece of the Republican Party and urge other news organizations not to treat Fox News as a legitimate news network.

On Wednesday, Obama, speaking publicly for the first time about his administration's portrayal of Fox News as illegitimate, said he's not "losing sleep" over the controversy.

"I think that what our advisers simply said is, is that we are going to take media as it comes," Obama said when asked about his advisers targeting the network openly. "And if media is operating, basically, as a talk radio format, then that's one thing. And if it's operating as a news outlet, then that's another. But it's not something I'm losing a lot of sleep over."

Obama's comments also came after he met Monday with political commentators Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow of MSNBC; Eugene Robinson and E.J. Dionne of the Washington Post; Ron Brownstein of the National Journal; John Dickerson of Slate; Frank Rich, Maureen Dowd and Bob Herbert of the New York Times; Jerry Seib of the Wall Street Journal, Gloria Borger of CNN and U.S. News and World Report, and Gwen Ifill of PBS.

House Republican leaders rushed to the defense of conservative commentators Thursday after the president's comments.

Rep. Mike Pence, chairman of the House Republican Conference, said conservative commentators speak more for Americans than the national media outlets that have targeted them for criticism.

"Goaded on by a White House increasingly intolerant of criticism, lately the national media has taken aim at conservative commentators in radio and television," the Indiana Republican said on the House floor. "Suggesting that they only speak for a small group of activists and even suggesting in one report today that Republicans in Washington are 'worried about their electoral effect.' Well, that's hogwash."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...zar-interview/

[Team Sergeant]

"No socialist government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently worded expressions of public discontent. They would have to fall back on some form of Gestapo, no doubt very humanely directed in the first instance. And this would nip opinion in the bud; it would stop criticism as it reared its head, and it would gather all the power to the supreme party and the party leaders, rising like stately pinnacles above their vast bureaucracies of civil servants, no longer servants and no longer civil. And where would the ordinary simple folk – the common people, as they like to call them in America – where would they be, once this mighty organism had got them in its grip?"
-Winston Churchill

[greenberetTFS]

Good post TS,let's hope enough of us get the picture...... I know I did.....

Big Teddy

[Bracholi]

It was only a matter of time before they tried this. Mayhaps BHO overestimated his media powerhouse support. This is only a minor victory in what I assume is only the beginning of such underhand tactics.

[Defender968]

Another blatant violation of the constitution, and an attack on the 1st amendment, not surprising by this crowd, glad to see the other media outlets at least had the guts to stand up and say no.

I just hope the general populace is paying attention.

[nmap]

The very existence of a pay czar speaks to a transition toward government ownership of the means of production - which is, as I understand it, communism. Not socialism, but actual communism.

Now if some form of health care passes....and given the Federal intrusion into home mortgage lending...and also given the ever-more pervasive actions of the federal reserve...I cannot help wondering where we are with respect to a transition into communism.

A black hole has an event horizon. Beyond that horizon, there is no escape - all possible futures lead deeper into the hole. In the case of a large black hole, such as is thought to be at the center of our galaxy, one might cross the event horizon and not know it.

So...rhetorical questions...have we crossed the economic event horizon? Or are we just flirting with it? Interesting times.

[frostfire]

Originally Posted by Defender968

I just hope the general populace is paying attention.

goodness gracious, this and the thesis on the other thread....how more obvious can you be?
Why aren't folks jumping up and down at this point?

Had I not taken the oath to defend the consitution (should this ship sinks, I'll sink along), I would have contemplated moving to New Zealand and be a sheep herder

[Gypsy]

The Chicago Mob got a taste of their own medicine...I'm guessing they didn't much care for the taste. Get used to it.


Glad to see the press corps handled themselves appropriately.