Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > At Ease > The Soapbox

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-07-2014, 16:55   #1
BMT (RIP)
Quiet Professional
 
BMT (RIP)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Red State
Posts: 3,774
Robert Gates Thinks Joe Biden Hasn't Stopped Being Wrong for 40 Years

http://news.yahoo.com/robert-gates-t...212615128.html


BMT
__________________
Don't mess with old farts...age and treachery will always overcome youth and skill! Bullshit and brilliance only come with age and experience.
BMT (RIP) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2014, 18:26   #2
mark46th
Quiet Professional
 
mark46th's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orange, Ca.
Posts: 4,950
"Robert Gates Thinks Joe Biden Hasn't Stopped Being Wrong for 40 Years"

That is code for, "He's an effing moron."
mark46th is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2014, 18:46   #3
Golf1echo
Area Commander
 
Golf1echo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Western Carolina in the rainforest,4000' along the Eastern Cont. Div.
Posts: 1,427
Inconvenient Truth

defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic;

http://www.history.army.mil/html/faq/oaths.html

Is it just me or does anyone else see the inconvenient truth for those in the Executive Branch that want do do things differently than the Constitution dictates? I think the current Executive Branch gets it. Why would those sworn to uphold both the Constitution and the President be such a threat? Why be murky with communication? It is unfortunate that the current Commander in Chief never served...
__________________
"It is because they have so much to give and give it so lavishly...that men love the mountains and go back to them again and again." Sir Francis Younghusband

Essayons

By Dand

"In the school of the wilds,there is no graduation day"Horace Kephart

Last edited by Golf1echo; 01-07-2014 at 21:25.
Golf1echo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2014, 21:32   #4
Team Sergeant
Quiet Professional
 
Team Sergeant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 20,929
Quote:
Originally Posted by Golf1echo View Post
defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic;

http://www.history.army.mil/html/faq/oaths.html

Is it just me or does anyone else see the inconvenient truth for those in the Executive Branch that want do do things differently than the Constitution dictates? I think the current Executive Branch gets it. Why would those sworn to uphold both the Constitution and the President be such a threat? Why be murky with communication? It is unfortunate that the current Commander in Chief never served...
I'm not tracking your term "uphold".

No one has sworn to defend the president, except maybe the secret service. That said all members of the United States military have sworn to defend the Constitution. If and when it comes down to the idiot vacationing in the WH or defending the Constitution I'll defend the Constitution.
Team Sergeant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2014, 21:52   #5
The Reaper
Quiet Professional
 
The Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland
Posts: 24,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by Golf1echo View Post
defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic;

http://www.history.army.mil/html/faq/oaths.html

Is it just me or does anyone else see the inconvenient truth for those in the Executive Branch that want do do things differently than the Constitution dictates? I think the current Executive Branch gets it. Why would those sworn to uphold both the Constitution and the President be such a threat? Why be murky with communication? It is unfortunate that the current Commander in Chief never served...
Honestly, I don't think he could have gotten into the military. He certainly could not have qualified for a security clearance without being elected into office and being given one.

TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910

De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
The Reaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2014, 22:11   #6
Golf1echo
Area Commander
 
Golf1echo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Western Carolina in the rainforest,4000' along the Eastern Cont. Div.
Posts: 1,427
Quote:
Originally Posted by Team Sergeant View Post
I'm not tracking your term "uphold".

No one has sworn to defend the president, except maybe the secret service. That said all members of the United States military have sworn to defend the Constitution. If and when it comes down to the idiot vacationing in the WH or defending the Constitution I'll defend the Constitution.
It is my mistake and appreciate the chance to explain, after a long day the last thing I want to see is reference to or images of J Biden, my blood pressure spiked a little bit there.

The wordings of the current oath of enlistment and oath for commissioned officers are as follows:

"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President * of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).

*That is quite different than what I said and I do stand corrected. I edited my sarcasm out to reflect what I was trying to say for clarity as well. Orders of the President ( Commander in Chief ) I take to be chain of command, I believe no person trumps the Constitution it is our founding document...
__________________
"It is because they have so much to give and give it so lavishly...that men love the mountains and go back to them again and again." Sir Francis Younghusband

Essayons

By Dand

"In the school of the wilds,there is no graduation day"Horace Kephart
Golf1echo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2014, 23:33   #7
Golf1echo
Area Commander
 
Golf1echo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Western Carolina in the rainforest,4000' along the Eastern Cont. Div.
Posts: 1,427
.
__________________
"It is because they have so much to give and give it so lavishly...that men love the mountains and go back to them again and again." Sir Francis Younghusband

Essayons

By Dand

"In the school of the wilds,there is no graduation day"Horace Kephart

Last edited by Golf1echo; 01-07-2014 at 23:41.
Golf1echo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2014, 23:40   #8
Golf1echo
Area Commander
 
Golf1echo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Western Carolina in the rainforest,4000' along the Eastern Cont. Div.
Posts: 1,427
Quote:
Originally Posted by mark46th View Post
"Robert Gates Thinks Joe Biden Hasn't Stopped Being Wrong for 40 Years"

That is code for, "He's an effing moron."
Much more to the point.
__________________
"It is because they have so much to give and give it so lavishly...that men love the mountains and go back to them again and again." Sir Francis Younghusband

Essayons

By Dand

"In the school of the wilds,there is no graduation day"Horace Kephart
Golf1echo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2014, 04:12   #9
BrokenSwitch
Guerrilla
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Israel
Posts: 277
Quote:
Originally Posted by Golf1echo View Post
It is my mistake and appreciate the chance to explain, after a long day the last thing I want to see is reference to or images of J Biden, my blood pressure spiked a little bit there.

The wordings of the current oath of enlistment and oath for commissioned officers are as follows:

"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President * of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).

*That is quite different than what I said and I do stand corrected. I edited my sarcasm out to reflect what I was trying to say for clarity as well. Orders of the President ( Commander in Chief ) I take to be chain of command, I believe no person trumps the Constitution it is our founding document...
There appears to be a built-in caveat intended to nullify the "just following orders" defense when POTUS and officers go off the Constitutional rail. Naturally, the job of determining whether questionable orders are legal falls to the JAG and possibly Eric Holder, and there's too many lawyers at the top already.

And thus, we have the law of unintended consequences.
__________________
"All that is thought should not be said, all that is said should not be written, all that is written should not be published, all that is published should not be read."
--The Kotzker Rebbe
BrokenSwitch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2014, 06:14   #10
Golf1echo
Area Commander
 
Golf1echo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Western Carolina in the rainforest,4000' along the Eastern Cont. Div.
Posts: 1,427
Seems I have derailed the original post, did not intend for that to be the case. To respond to your post because of the quote: The oath is the one we take within the military and has to do with chain of command.
Your quote: "There appears to be a built-in caveat intended to nullify the "just following orders" defense when POTUS and officers go off the Constitutional rail"
When I served that would have been well above my pay grade. I no longer am in that chain of command and know who I respect and don't respect based on my understanding, opinion, and observations. The question you raise is much like the original questions we once faced " Taxation without representation" and others. The Constitution is a well thought out document written by better men than myself, it has guided us very well through many different events in history and is as enduring as any. For me it is sad to see what I regard as abuse of it for personal and political agendas...Should someone disagree with (or parts of ) the Constitution they need to embark on the process of changing the document not circumventing it... The system is designed to balance those abuses out in judicial, executive, and legislative branches . Yes that can be a long and drawn out process and yes there are to many lawyers, politicians, and agendas involved but those are the built in checks and balances.

Another of your quotes: " Naturally, the job of determining whether questionable orders are legal falls to the JAG and possibly Eric Holder" In the long run the courts and history will decide. As said American Soldiers take the oath to support and defend the Constitution...

Good luck with the e h thing he is part of the problem...
__________________
"It is because they have so much to give and give it so lavishly...that men love the mountains and go back to them again and again." Sir Francis Younghusband

Essayons

By Dand

"In the school of the wilds,there is no graduation day"Horace Kephart
Golf1echo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2014, 06:20   #11
kgoerz
Quiet Professional
 
kgoerz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NC for now
Posts: 2,418
wonder how many times he wanted to smack Biden in the back of the head
__________________
Sounds like a s#*t sandwhich, but I'll fight anyone, I'm in.
kgoerz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2014, 09:19   #12
Richard
Quiet Professional
 
Richard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 15,370
Mr Gates has obviously spent time with Jill Biden discussing her husband.

Gates also praised former SecState Clinton and scathingly excoriated the more recent Congresses for their ineffectiveness as a legislative body.

And so it goes...

Richard
__________________
“Sometimes the Bible in the hand of one man is worse than a whisky bottle in the hand of (another)… There are just some kind of men who – who’re so busy worrying about the next world they’ve never learned to live in this one, and you can look down the street and see the results.” - To Kill A Mockingbird (Atticus Finch)

“Almost any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.” - Robert Heinlein
Richard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2014, 09:38   #13
Dusty
RIP Quiet Professional
 
Dusty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Ozarks
Posts: 10,072
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard View Post
Gates also praised former SecState Clinton

And so it goes...

Richard

Perfectly understandable, given all she's accomplished in her lifetime.

Her roll-up-the-sleeves-and-get-to-work accomplishment of so many important missions is reminiscent of the stellar, landmark legislation Obama pushed through prior to his coronation.


Additionally, she's a real warrior:

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...g-under-sniper
__________________
"There you go, again." Ronald Reagan
Dusty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2014, 10:11   #14
tonyz
Area Commander
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 4,792
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dusty View Post

Perfectly understandable, given all she's accomplished in her lifetime.

Her roll-up-the-sleeves-and-get-to-work accomplishment of so many important missions is reminiscent of the stellar, landmark legislation Obama pushed through prior to his coronation.


Additionally, she's a real warrior:

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...g-under-sniper
Lol, 'splains her lack of credible response to Benghazi...musta been sleep deprivation...

...or PTSD.
__________________
The function of wisdom is to discriminate between good and evil.

Marcus Tullius Cicero
tonyz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2014, 10:47   #15
PRB
Quiet Professional
 
PRB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,321
"Just get you a double barrel shotgun"
PRB is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:10.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies