Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > Special Forces Weapons > Weapons Discussion Area

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-04-2004, 01:05   #1
JGarcia
Guerrilla
 
JGarcia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Miguel, CA
Posts: 407
M34 WP Grenade

I was perusing the digital library, looking at FM 3.23-25, I noticed that the M34 WP grenade is covered under Appendix E "Obsolete Hand Grenades"

"Although these grenades are no longer common to the US inventory, the majority of them are still in use by other services or nations."

Does this mean that as an infantry soldier we won't see these anymore?

"The M34 chemical smoke grenade is the most versatile of all hand grenades (Figure E-8). The grenade can be used for signaling, screening, or incendiary missions, or for producing casualties. The use of this grenade also has a psychological impact on the enemy."

That being the case, why did they do away with it? I didnt see any other WP hand grenades in the FM, although it does briefly refer to the M34's predecessor the M15. When I looked for a WP hand grenade on CALL2.army.mil there were several references to WP grenades, but none listed in the most recent studies of weapons effects, etc.

Do we not have a WP grenade in inventory anymore?
__________________
National Guard Marksmanship Training Center
JGarcia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2004, 14:13   #2
MAB32
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
A number of years ago (George senior's watch, I believe) the U.S. signed a "chemical" treaty/ban with some other countries. I believe that the USSR(called that at the time) was also a signer. Not only did it deal with the stockpiling, manufacture of, but it also banned the use of CS, CS1 CS2, CN, and DM(we banned this one ourselves back in the 60's) in war. In other words all chemicals used for crowd control. I do believe that WP was included based upon the fact that not only does it burn but if the smoke is inhaled it can/will cause "chemical" induced pneumonia and do something with the bones of the body. The 18D's here can shed allot more light on this than me.

IMHO, if we were able to use CS in the Iraqi and Afghanistan AO's then we might not have as many problems.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2004, 17:05   #3
longrange1947
Quiet Professional
 
longrange1947's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fayetteville NC
Posts: 3,533
Thumbs down WP Grenades

They were banned from carry on all my teams. They could not be thrown past the possible bursting radius and a burning piece of that stuff would burn through you unless you could keep oxygen away form it. Since blood contained oxygen it would have a field day. Say a guy burned to death by one of his own. They were best fired form the grenade launcher mod for the M14. Problem was if a round hit the blasted things they were a mess.

My opinion, let the games begin.
__________________
Hold Hard guys

Rick B.

Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit.
Wisdom is knowing it is great on a hamburger but not so great sticking one up your ass.

Author - Richard.

Experience is what you get right after you need it.

Author unknown.
longrange1947 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2004, 17:09   #4
The Reaper
Quiet Professional
 
The Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland
Posts: 24,813
I'll be the odd man out.

Smoke and casualties from one munition. I love them.

Got to be a strong thrower, or use them from cover though.

Great for boobytraps, too. AFAIK, they are still in the inventory.

Army probably decided that they were too dangerous to issue to the troops.

Too bad, I bet Darwin would have loved them too.

TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910

De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
The Reaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2004, 20:41   #5
MAB32
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
SOG guys know everything there is to know about this device!
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2004, 22:41   #6
JGarcia
Guerrilla
 
JGarcia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Miguel, CA
Posts: 407
Wp

As MAB32 said, it must have something to do with a treaty, I can understand the Army doing away with them because Joe snuffy couldnt throw them far enough, but if that was the sole reason for getting rid of them I would imagine that the Army would field a lighter WP Grenade. From what I have read at center for army lessons learned it doesnt look like such a replacement is in the works.

Too bad.

Even when I checked for a WP round for the M203, the latest FM 3-22.31 lists no WP round in the ammunition section. A damned shame.
__________________
National Guard Marksmanship Training Center

Last edited by JGarcia; 09-04-2004 at 22:52.
JGarcia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2004, 22:52   #7
MAB32
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
When I became state certified as an instructor in "Chemical & Specialty Munitions" we were told that DM had been eliminated from the military's inventory. I later found out that this may not be completely true. The military(from what I am told; especially some NG units) does have DM/CN stockpiled as a "last resort" less-lethal option. However, anybody that knows anything about this stuff knows for a fact that DM in moderate doses will kill. So it wouldn't suprise me if we still have WP in one form or another locked up somewhere.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2004, 23:23   #8
Huey14
Kia ora, bro
 
Huey14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 931
I understand the British still have them, I'm not sure about us, but I can find out if anyone's interested.
__________________
"You destroyed half a city block!"

"That block was already messed up."
Huey14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2004, 11:35   #9
longrange1947
Quiet Professional
 
longrange1947's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fayetteville NC
Posts: 3,533
Thumbs down WP Grenade

Sorry TR - Still don't like them and my post should have read SAW a guy burn to death from one. That will definately color your view on carrying the dam things.

Heavy is an understatement for the weight of them. I was not the only team sgt to ban carring the things and a number of 10s also refused to carry them.

In basic, we had a demo of one WP grenade thrown, the guy was behind a wall and we could not see him after the explosion AND some of hte pieces landed by us. Nope do not like the dam things. Great for a launcher but not hand thrown.

Again my 2 cents.
__________________
Hold Hard guys

Rick B.

Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit.
Wisdom is knowing it is great on a hamburger but not so great sticking one up your ass.

Author - Richard.

Experience is what you get right after you need it.

Author unknown.
longrange1947 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 19:18.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies